Could this possibly be True?

[3waycross]

How to get $75k in benefits for you and your girlfriend!!

Follow these easy, proven, 13 steps financial well-being.
1. Don't get married to her.
2. Use your mom's address to get mail sent to.
3. Guy, (YOU) buys a house.
4. Guy rents out house to his girl girlfriend who has 2 of his kids.
5. Section 8 will pay $900 a month for a 3 bedroom home.
6. Girlfriend signs up for Obamacare so guy doesn't have to pay out the butt for family insurance.
7. Girlfriend gets to go to college free for being a single mother
8. Girlfriend gets $600 a month for food stamps
9. Girlfriend gets free cell phone
10. Girlfriend get free utilities.
11. Guy moves into home but uses moms house to get mail sent to.
12. Girlfriend claims one kid and guy claims one kid on taxes. Now you both get to claim head of house hold at $1800 credit.
13. Girlfriend gets disability for being "crazy" or having a "bad back" at $1800 a month and never has to work again.
This plan is perfectly legal and is being executed now by millions of people.
A married couple with a stay at home mom yields $0.00 dollars.
An unmarried couple with stay at home mom nets:
$21600 disability +
$10800 free housing +
$6000 free Obamacare +
$6000 free food +
$4800 free utilities +
$6000 Pell grant money to spend +
$12000 a year in college tuition free from Pell grant +
$8800 tax benefit for being a single mother
=$75,000 a year in benefits

Is there any doubt why our country is 18 + trillion in debt ?

 

[Bigfoot]

Not only true, but practiced by many.

 

[cowboy43]

Yes it is true!

 

[HDRider]

I had a friend who's daughter fell into a bad crowd, got pregnant and then the support group educated her on how to get all that. My friend, the father, sadly, has basically disowned her. He is a hard working guy, and that is not how she was raised. She saw the easy way, and took it.

If we put these programs in place, we can't blame people for taking advantage of them. We should blame ourselves for electing people that put this socialist program in place. Almost every person we elect gets re-elected time after time. Oops, I hope that is not political. I had to say it.

 

[hurleyjd]

Like to have Governor Abbott's income tax bill of $104.

 

[3waycross]

Like to have Governor Abbott's income tax bill of $104.

At least he tried to earn some of that money he failed to pay taxes on.......

Frankly I was expecting a far better response than that from you, you old socialist. :lol2: :lol2: :lol2: :lol2:

 

[fenceman]

Very true pos people do this for a living. Get rid of all forms of welfare food stamps, unemployment etc. Get to work or starve it's up to you

 

[wacocowboy]

When people find they can vote themselves money, that will herald the end of the republic. People sure have found that out. I have been saying for years we need to go to system if you don't pay taxes you don't vote. I want the people who vote to at least have skin in the game. Wouldn't hurt my feelings if we went to only property owners can vote. This whole idea everyone has a right to vote is bs the founding fathers said only male property owners could vote. I won't be as harsh as the founding fathers so I say any property owner can vote.

 

[TexasBred]

3Way....run those numbers again but this time be more realistic and use 4 or 5 chilluns.

 

[TexasBred]

Like to have Governor Abbott's income tax bill of $104.

You now Hurley if the system worked perfect we would ALL owe Zero taxes when we file our return. ;-) Looks like Abbott missed it about 8.70 a month and is getting a refund of over $19,000.00. Took the same deductions Buckwheat took . Just didn't make nearly as much money.

 

[Supa Dexta]

This'll stir yas up

http://www.inquisitr.com/2015388/woman- ... edium=Feed

 

[Anonymous]

Very true pos people do this for a living. Get rid of all forms of welfare food stamps, unemployment etc. Get to work or starve it's up to you

I have been saying the same for a long time. Two other things directly related to these programs;
#1 The limited workforce of today. Every business that requires real work, sweaty, dirty back breaking labor, cant find people to do the job. It's easier to use the system. Why work hard when a person doesn't have to.
#2 Charity has went by the wayside. I'm very guilty of this. With all the programs available, why give or help someone when the government has created all these giveaways that are available. Charity is a moral obligation, not a right.
So I agree, hunger is a pretty good motivator. Not everyone has a lot of ambition and drive but everyone gets hungry.

 

[fenceman]

When people find they can vote themselves money, that will herald the end of the republic. People sure have found that out. I have been saying for years we need to go to system if you don't pay taxes you don't vote. I want the people who vote to at least have skin in the game. Wouldn't hurt my feelings if we went to only property owners can vote. This whole idea everyone has a right to vote is bs the founding fathers said only male property owners could vote. I won't be as harsh as the founding fathers so I say any property owner can vote.

I like that idea pretty good Waco. Here's mine.(I'm sure some more educated members will point out the flaws, and that's fine.) Why shouldn't everyone regardless of financial status pay exactly the same. Like a flat rate. It would be fair, and very simple. You antie up every year and be done with it. You have a child you pay , by the head.

 

[Anonymous]

"When people find they can vote themselves money, that will herald the end of the republic."


The Republic has been over for a while now!

 

[greybeard]

When people find they can vote themselves money, that will herald the end of the republic. People sure have found that out. I have been saying for years we need to go to system if you don't pay taxes you don't vote. I want the people who vote to at least have skin in the game. Wouldn't hurt my feelings if we went to only property owners can vote. This whole idea everyone has a right to vote is bs the founding fathers said only male property owners could vote. I won't be as harsh as the founding fathers so I say any property owner can vote.

I like that idea pretty good Waco. Here's mine.(I'm sure some more educated members will point out the flaws, and that's fine.) Why shouldn't everyone regardless of financial status pay exactly the same. Like a flat rate. It would be fair, and very simple. You antie up every year and be done with it. You have a child you pay , by the head.

They could do that, but the same people who presently and loudly complain that the Jonses down the street make more and therefore should pay more tax, would still complain mightily.
Thou shall not covet.

 

[fenceman]

When people find they can vote themselves money, that will herald the end of the republic. People sure have found that out. I have been saying for years we need to go to system if you don't pay taxes you don't vote. I want the people who vote to at least have skin in the game. Wouldn't hurt my feelings if we went to only property owners can vote. This whole idea everyone has a right to vote is bs the founding fathers said only male property owners could vote. I won't be as harsh as the founding fathers so I say any property owner can vote.

I like that idea pretty good Waco. Here's mine.(I'm sure some more educated members will point out the flaws, and that's fine.) Why shouldn't everyone regardless of financial status pay exactly the same. Like a flat rate. It would be fair, and very simple. You antie up every year and be done with it. You have a child you pay , by the head.

They could do that, but the same people who presently and loudly complain that the Jonses down the street make more and therefore should pay more tax, would still complain mightily.
Thou shall not covet.

Understood, but should you be fined for being successful?.......or for being unsuccessful?

 

[Jogeephus]

Why shouldn't everyone regardless of financial status pay exactly the same. Like a flat rate. It would be fair, and very simple. You antie up every year and be done with it.

I like that idea but I think it makes too much sense. Politicians cannot manipulate the voters by promising either free stuff or that you can keep more of your money if you vote for them. Its a game and it keeps the career politicians and bureaucrats in job because there are only so many beer cans on the side of the road to pick up and that's about all most are qualified to do.

 

[Bigfoot]

I have hesitated to post this, but I guess I will. I personally know someone who's wife is on disability. Ofcourse she's not actually disabled. There is no way in the world, that could beat her in a foot race to the mailbox. She just stuck with, and applied a bunch of times, and now she's on it. He has refused a raise, for about 7 years now. The reason being that his family would no longer qualify for big long list of benefits if crosses over the threshold of some majic number. That majic number is somewhere around $55,000. He would lose thousands in freebies. It's kind sickening to watch him do this. Not sure what his total package is worth, but it's a bunch.

 

[bball]

The real problem here is accountability for all these social welfare programs. By that I mean there virtually is none...welfare is supposed to be temporary and you should have to meet strict criteria very frequently to continue to qualify. I see it every single night at my 'real' job. The sense of entitlement is mind boggling. The abuse is disgusting and these people tend to be more fertile than any other percentage of our population. The working class is dying off and being bred out of existence.

 

[Kathie in Thorp]

This kinda slaps me right in my gut, because I do work w/ child support enforcement and paternity work. Every day. 9 hrs. a day. And so much is wrong with out it works.