Cattle Producers Urge Congress To Rein In USDA

Help Support CattleToday:

Oldtimer

Well-known member
Joined
Jan 19, 2004
Messages
3,922
Reaction score
33
Location
Northeast Montana
Cattle Producers Urge Congress To Rein In USDA



TheCattleSite News Desk

October 05, 2007



WASHINGTON – After the recent massive recalls of beef due to E. coli contamination, and after many other recent food scares, members of R-CALF USA were pleased to learn that Sen. Tom Harkin, D-Iowa, has announced he will again mandate a Presidential Commission on food safety in the Senate version of the 2007 Farm Bill. Such a mandate was included in the 2002 Farm Bill, but was never constituted or allowed to meet.



Harkin pointed out that the recent Interagency Working Group on Import Safety, established in July, will review only imported foods. This is a shortsighted goal given the increasing number of food safety recalls happening with food produced in the United States, he said in a statement.



"To examine the safety of both imported and domestically produced food, comprehensive recommendations from a Food Safety Commission are needed…to examine the entire system,"
the statement said.



"R-CALF USA would again like to emphasize our concern with the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) and its continued relaxation of import health and safety standards with regard to cattle and beef," said R-CALF USA President/Region VI Director Max Thornsberry, a Missouri veterinarian.



"Not only is R-CALF worried about the introduction of BSE (bovine spongiform encephalopathy) from Canada and Japan, we also want to know why the agency has such a nonchalant attitude when USDA's own research shows that about 75 percent of the bovine tuberculosis cases detected at U.S. slaughtering facilities originated in Mexico," he pointed out.



"USDA is mandated to protect the U.S. livestock industry, but instead, seems intent upon its idea of creating a North American cattle industry," Thornsberry asserted. "The Secretary of Agriculture should be working on behalf of independent U.S. cattle producers to make sure the whole world knows we have the safest, most wholesome beef supply on the planet, and he also should be taking the steps necessary to prevent the introduction of foreign animal diseases."



Below are just a few examples of how USDA continues to implement policy that lowers U.S. health and safety import standard for cattle and beef:



1. USDA has lowered U.S. import restrictions for beef and cattle from BSE-affected countries below international standards (the U.S. does not comply with the OIE standard to exclude high risk tissues from all animal feed and fertilizer) and below the world norm (the U.S. requires less BSE testing, weaker SRM removal requirements, and a weaker feed ban than other BSE-affected countries).

2. USDA is proposing to allow imports of older Canadian cattle into the U.S. provided they are born after March 1, 1999, the date USDA claims was when the Canadian feed ban was effectively enforced. However, five of the seven cases of BSE detected in Canada since January 2006 were born after the March 1, 1999, eligibility date.

3. USDA's risk assessment model predicts the U.S. will import 19 BSE-positive cattle into the U.S. from Canada under its proposed rule to further relax U.S. BSE protections. Allowing BSE-infected cattle into the U.S. is contrary to Congress' mandate to prevent the introduction of diseases like BSE into the United States.

4. USDA is proposing to allow fresh and chilled beef from a region within Argentina, despite an outbreak of foot-and-mouth disease (FMD) in Argentina in 2006.

5. USDA's Office of Inspector General (OIG) has informed USDA that approximately 75 percent of bovine tuberculosis cases detected at slaughter originated from Mexico, yet USDA has not taken steps to prevent the continual introduction of bovine TB from Mexico.

6. USDA's OIG found that the U.S. ignored the fact that Canadian meatpackers were not meeting the U.S. equivalency standard, and yet Canadian meat was still exported to the United States.



"R-CALF hopes that Congress will take decisive steps to rein in USDA so we can restore adequate protections for the long-term health and safety of the U.S. cattle herd and U.S. beef consumers," Thornsberry concluded.



thecattlesite.com
 
October 2007 Update on Feed Enforcement Activities to Limit the Spread of BSE

http://www.phxnews.com/fullstory.php?article=53149


Transmissible Spongiform Encephalopathy UPDATE USA OCTOBER 2007

http://www.phxnews.com/fullstory.php?article=53128


CREUTZFELDT JAKOB DISEASE MAD COW BASE, CWD, SCRAPIE UPDATE OCT 2007


http://cjdmadcowbaseoct2007.blogspot.com/



ABSTRACTS SPORADIC CJD AND H BASE MAD COW ALABAMA AND TEXAS SEPTEMBER 2007

Date: Mon, 24 Sep 2007 21:31:55 -0500



I suggest that you all read the data out about h-BASE and sporadic CJD, GSS,
blood, and some of the other abstracts from the PRION2007. ...



http://lists.ifas.ufl.edu/cgi-bin/wa.ex ... S=&P=19744




*** PLEASE READ AND UNDERSTAND THE RAMIFICATIONS OF THIS !!! THE PRICE OF
POKER INDEED GOES UP. ...TSS

USA BASE CASE, (ATYPICAL BSE), AND OR TSE (whatever they are calling it
today), please note that both the ALABAMA COW, AND THE TEXAS COW, both were
''H-TYPE'', personal communication Detwiler et al Wednesday, August 22, 2007
11:52 PM. ...TSS



http://lists.ifas.ufl.edu/cgi-bin/wa.ex ... =0&P=19779


ALL IN ALL, it's a terribly failed system of TSE surveillance and attempted
erradication of this agent in the USA,
a failed policy driven by industry greed and ignorance. ...

http://lists.ifas.ufl.edu/cgi-bin/wa.ex ... =P&P=10277



Terry S. Singeltary Sr.
P.O. Box 42
Bacliff, Texas USA 77518
 
10/15/2007 11:48:00 AM


Cattle Update: NFU To Congress - Reject Rule On Canadian Border

WASHINGTON (Oct. 15, 2007) - National Farmers Union President Tom Buis, in a letter to members of Congress today, urged support for legislation to disapprove the U.S. Department of Agriculture's (USDA) final rule to expand cattle and beef trade from minimal risk regions. Legislation to reject the rule has been introduced in the Senate by Sens. Byron Dorgan, D-N.D., and Mike Enzi, R-Wyo., and in the House by Reps. Stephanie Herseth Sandlin, D-S.D., and Denny Rehberg, R-Mont.

The rule would expand beef and cattle trade with Canada, by allowing the importation of additional live animals and beef products from any aged animal. This rule comes despite the fact that Canada has nine confirmed cases of bovine spongiform encephalopathy (BSE) and four of the nine cases were in an animal born after March 1, 1999. The final rule would allow live animals born after this date into the United States.

"At a minimum, consumers should know the origin of the meat they purchase before expanding trade with Canada. It simply does not make sense to risk American consumers' confidence in our meat supply by opening the Canadian border at a time when Canada has yet to demonstrate its BSE problem is under control," Buis said.

In the letter, Buis urged that the following measures be addressed prior to reopening the Canadian border:


Canada can prove and verify their cattle herd and beef products are BSE-free;



Canada can prove and verify 100 percent compliance with the ruminant feed ban;



U.S. international beef export markets are firmly reestablished;



Mandatory country-of-origin labeling is fully implemented;



Rapid-test technology is provided to all domestic slaughtering facilities to provide stability to the cattle market, and another layer of confidence for the American consuming public; and



A guaranteed economic safety net for American producers if the importation of cattle and beef products from BSE-positive countries negatively impacts domestic profitability.



The NFU board of directors, in a Sept. 21 letter to Congress said, "National Farmers Union believes American producers and consumers deserve better." The rule was published in the Federal Register Sept. 18, giving Congress 60 days to review.
 
Does Tom think that we should provide the same thing for our consumers? If that is the case I would be on his side. We can put a bse pos. into the food chain but still find fault with everyone else in the world :shock: does that not seem a bit strange to you OT :roll:
 
mwj":3l5a28z0 said:
Does Tom think that we should provide the same thing for our consumers? If that is the case I would be on his side. We can put a bse pos. into the food chain but still find fault with everyone else in the world :shock: does that not seem a bit strange to you OT :roll:

NFU has supported both M-COOL for all countries- and allowing Creekstone and any other packers to test and market BSE tested beef.....Its been the Packer groups like AMI/NCBA/USDA that have opposed most true transparency..
 
mwj":2a9rrr41 said:
Does Tom think that we should provide the same thing for our consumers? If that is the case I would be on his side. We can put a bse pos. into the food chain but still find fault with everyone else in the world :shock: does that not seem a bit strange to you OT :roll:


Are they in line for that ''pesky'' ruminant'' feed ban policy??? Sure do not see many headlines on that . Are we still letting a few hundred thousand tons slip thru the cracks every year? Do they back any type of changes on the use of that good old southern staple ''poultry litter'' :roll:
 
mwj":umgim8k6 said:
mwj":umgim8k6 said:
Does Tom think that we should provide the same thing for our consumers? If that is the case I would be on his side. We can put a bse pos. into the food chain but still find fault with everyone else in the world :shock: does that not seem a bit strange to you OT :roll:


Are they in line for that ''pesky'' ruminant'' feed ban policy??? Sure do not see many headlines on that . Are we still letting a few hundred thousand tons slip thru the cracks every year? Do they back any type of changes on the use of that good old southern staple ''poultry litter'' :roll:

Not sure where NFU stands on tightening the feedban-- I know R-CALF and USCA believe that if we are going to import from higher risk countries- that it should be tightened before they allow that importing...
I think all cattlemen/Ag groups- even the Packer bought NCBA- have come out against using poultry litter in any feed.....But with this administration/USDA the Corporate giants like Tyson and Cargill that also produce chickens have the say....
 

Latest posts

Top