Ebenezer
Well-known member
It was another time in so many ways.If only you had known beforehand and if male sexed semen was available you could have made something good out of a bad situation
It was another time in so many ways.If only you had known beforehand and if male sexed semen was available you could have made something good out of a bad situation
I just wish they would tell the expected gestation period of the progeny.I think folks put too much faith in EPD’s. Especially, when it comes to those curve benders and do it all numbers bulls. Logic would dictate that an outlier for high growth numbers as well as low BW/high CED numbers is going to moderate at least in one area when more of a broad swath of information is recorded.
Even with higher accuracies EPD’s are just a tool.
His offspring are some of the most correct Angus in sale catalogs so I can see the attraction to him. But those are still pictures and not taken on the run for cover!I used Quaker Hills Rampage when he first hit the scene. I used him on a LH cow, so I was hoping for some wicked growth. What I got was a bull that almost ate my dinner post foot surgery. The mistake was using the new "superstar" bull on the scene. Now I ask for CED, DOC and ACCURACY. I'll even skip the CED for accuracy.
You’re the second one to respond that got bit by the bad temperament of the Rampage bull.I used Quaker Hills Rampage when he first hit the scene.
His docility EPD is something like -2. Appears to be accurate. Never used him,but he has a good look.You’re the second one to respond that got bit by the bad temperament of the Rampage bull.
I looked up his EPD's. A long with that bad attitude, he's a -36 in $EN. That's my kind of cattle. Can survive on air and thrive in the corn belt.Quaker Hills Rampage
I may be misunderstanding your comment, but negative EN scores are not desirable.. a higher EN value reflects lower input cattle..I looked up his EPD's. A long with that bad attitude, he's a -36 in $EN. That's my kind of cattle. Can survive on air and thrive in the corn belt.
How'd you know she was left handed?I used him on a LH cow
I think SBMF 2015 is into finishing cattle, and negative EN score would in theory make for bigger frame that would finish out bigger.I may be misunderstanding your comment, but negative EN scores are not desirable.. a higher EN value reflects lower input cattle..
Star Power's dam was something of a power cow. Sire was Dream On which was fairly easy calving. Star Power was an embryo birth, so his actual (low) birth weight may or may not mean much and would not have been used in his initial BW EPD calculation. 2009 BW EPD was +2. Current EPD's on the bull show a +4.9 BW and 6.5 CE EPD with high accuracy. Obviously not a calving ease bull and certainly not a bull to use on heifers. A couple of points (that I have made before) – use low accuracy EPD's with caution (especially on fire and ice matings), but high accuracy EPD's with lots of progeny (over 500 on this bull) generally reflect reality.Star Power Simmental bull. Went to Genex meeting and they promoted him as CE bull. All my Ai customers wanted him and I used the crap out of him, for 1 year! Vets got good and C-sections!
Star Power is the reason I no longer use unproven bulls. Lesson learned. Calves that lived were pretty darn nice.Star Power's dam was something of a power cow. Sire was Dream On which was fairly easy calving. Star Power was an embryo birth, so his actual (low) birth weight may or may not mean much and would not have been used in his initial BW EPD calculation. 2009 BW EPD was +2. Current EPD's on the bull show a +4.9 BW and 6.5 CE EPD with high accuracy. Obviously not a calving ease bull and certainly not a bull to use on heifers. A couple of points (that I have made before) – use low accuracy EPD's with caution (especially on fire and ice matings), but high accuracy EPD's with lots of progeny (over 500 on this bull) generally reflect reality.
Current semen price - $5/straw.
You had me thinking for a bit there, derrrr.How'd you know she was left handed?
Your right, I hadn't read the definition for a long time.I may be misunderstanding your comment, but negative EN scores are not desirable.. a higher EN value reflects lower input cattle..