Bigger fish to fry!

Help Support CattleToday:

S.R.R.

Well-known member
Joined
Mar 7, 2005
Messages
1,219
Reaction score
0
Location
Canada
45,000 Canadians die from smoking each year. 6000 from alcohol.

435,000 Americans die from smoking each year. 85 000 from alcohol.

Only one human death in Canada has been related to BSE.

USA has none.

Do alcohol and tobacco companies experience crashing markets? Do goverments band imports?

Humans: Who can figure them out? :roll: :roll:
 
SRR WROTE;


Only one human death in Canada has been related to BSE.

USA has none.


==================

DREAM ON THERE SRR. your wrong in more ways than one.
there is indeed one nvCJD case in the USA that was documented, but she lived in the UK too. many more atypical strains that are suspicious documented now as 'uknown', but the rest of the story is that there are more than one strain and the damn ukbsenvcjd only theory is a pipe dream. scientist around the globe are rethinking this as we speak. but dont take my word for it, time may prove me wrong, time may prove me more correct than anyone ever imagined if Alzheimers comes into the picture other than mis-diagnosed, but that science is much further down the line, or is it? hope i am wrong. my mom also drove a car all her life and died from the Heidenhain Variant of Creutzfeldt Jakob disease. they proved in mission texas long ago that US scrapie transmitted to USA cattle DID NOT look like UK BSE, so why would USA bovinecjd look like UK nvCJD, either from a direct route of oral consumption and or a secondary route via a multitude of other proven routes and sources ???


i could paste many new peer review studies that are beginning to dispute the ukbsenvcjd only theory, but i will only post this from one, cause i know most of time here i am talking to myself;



Coexistence of multiple PrPSc types in individuals with

Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease


Magdalini Polymenidou, Katharina Stoeck, Markus
Glatzel, Martin Vey, Anne Bellon, and Adriano Aguzzi


snip...


The above results set the existing CJD classifications

into debate and introduce interesting questions about

human CJD types. For example, do human prion types

exist in a dynamic equilibrium in the brains of affected

individuals? Do they coexist in most or even all CJD

cases? Is the biochemically identified PrPSc type simply

the dominant type, and not the only PrPSc species?


Published online October 31, 2005



http://neurology.thelancet.com


the current diagnostic criteria differentiating the hbTSE i.e. human bovine TSE from other haTSE i.e. human animal TSE and other hTSE i.e. iCJD/fCJD are wrong, and have been for a long time. considering the fact that BSE is not a researchable agent anymore accept for the chosen ones from the federal gov i.e. homeland security, and the fact they seem to have wanted to destroy all the human TSE samples submitted for research, and indeed they did destroy some from what the final outcome was, i dont know what to think ;

http://www.washingtontimes.com/upi-brea ... -6771r.htm


:help: :help: :help:


TSS
 
So you agree that to date Canada has had only 1 death from BSE and the US none.
 
Terry- You just brought up two of the things I don't believe most people even know or realize-- First is that they are finding many varying strains of both BSE and vCJD around the world- and have no real answers for these variations...ex. the Texas cow did not match the variation in the Canadian cow that was found in Washington....

Secondly the possiblility for years of missed diagnosis on the TSE diseases...As a retired Coroner and Medical Examiner Investigator I really wonder how many of these cases that were diagnosed by a MD as Altzheimers and never posted after death could have actually been something else-- I retired in Dec. 1999 and know that prior to that time BSE, TSE's, or CJD was not even anything that was being taught,talked about, or thought of by most in the medical examiners field.....
 
S.R.R.":1bomhya4 said:
So you agree that to date...death from BSE and the US none.

No, I don't agree. It was simply called a 'brain virus' back then. But then, BSE was unheard of then, too.
 
msscamp":23a3ijht said:
S.R.R.":23a3ijht said:
So you agree that to date...death from BSE and the US none.

No, I don't agree. It was simply called a 'brain virus' back then. But then, BSE was unheard of then, too.

I am sure you are right msscamp. But that does not take away from the fact that the world is over reacting with this!!!!!!
 
srr wrote;

So you agree that to date Canada has had only 1 death from BSE and the US none. ..........

absolutely not, i dont agree at all. the diagnostic criteria differentiating nvCJD between all the rest, is a joke at best.
don't take my word on it, read what the scientist are saying about it now;


DIAGNOSTIC CRITERIA FOR VARIANT CJD

I

A) PROGRESSIVE NEUROPSYCHIATRIC DISORDER

B) DURATION OF ILLNESS > 6 MONTHS

C) ROUTINE INVESTIGATIONS DO NOT SUGGEST AN ALTERNATIVE DIAGNOSIS

D) NO HISTORY OF POTENTIAL IATROGENIC EXPOSURE

II

A) EARLY PSYCHIATRIC SYMPTOMS *

B) PERSISTENT PAINFUL SENSORY SYMPTOMS **

C) ATAXIA

D) MYOCLONUS OR CHOREA OR DYSTONIA

E) DEMENTIA

III

A) EEG DOES NOT SHOW THE TYPICAL APPEARANCE OF SPORADIC CJD *** (OR NO EEG
PERFORMED)

B) BILATERAL PULVINAR HIGH SIGNAL ON MRI SCAN

IV

A) POSITIVE TONSIL BIOPSY

DEFINITE: IA (PROGRESSIVE NEUROPSYCHIATRIC DISORDER) and

NEUROPATHOLOGICAL CONFIRMATION OF vCJD ****

PROBABLE: I and 4/5 OF II and III A and III B

or I and IV A

* depression, anxiety, apathy, withdrawal, delusions.

** this includes both frank pain and/ or unpleasant dysaesthesia

*** generalised triphasic periodic complexes at approximately one per second

****spongiform change and extensive PrP deposition with florid plaques,
throughout

the cerebrum and cerebellum.


http://www.dh.gov.uk/PublicationsAndSta ... ReleasesNo
tices/fs/en?CONTENT_ID=4132940&chk=ao5pX7


see increase of sporadic CJD over the years ;


http://www.eurocjd.ed.ac.uk/sporadic.htm


USA


notice steady increase, but also notice in 2005, # 7 the 38 pendings cases
through Oct. and #8 includes 53 type pending, 1 type unknown.

if you look at 2003 there were 3 type unknown.

wonder if they were the same or different than the unknown in 2005?

considering the soup that has been brewing over here in the USA for years
via the rendering of BSE and atypical TSE in cattle, CWD, Scrapie, a few TME
cases (not too much due to scent gland, but there were a few rendered, but
all this, and you have one hell of a recipe for a new strains of TSE in
humans. then who knows what 'friendly fire' cases would look like from this
soup via secondary transmission via medical/surgical/dental arena. ...TSS


National Prion Disease Pathology Surveillance Center case exams...


http://www.cjdsurveillance.com/resource ... eport.html


Full Text
Diagnosis and Reporting of Creutzfeldt-Jakob Disease
Singeltary, Sr et al.
JAMA.2001; 285: 733-734


http://jama.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/fu ... S=10&hits=
10&RESULTFORMAT=&fulltext=dignosing+and+reporting+creutzfeldt+jakob+disease&
searchid=1048865596978_1528&stored_search=&FIRSTINDEX=0&journalcode=jama





Coexistence of multiple PrPSc types in individuals with

Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease


Magdalini Polymenidou, Katharina Stoeck, Markus
Glatzel, Martin Vey, Anne Bellon, and Adriano Aguzzi


Summary


Background The molecular typing of sporadic
Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease (CJD) is based on the size
and glycoform

ratio of protease-resistant prion protein (PrPSc), and
on PRNP haplotype. On digestion with proteinase K, type
1 and

type 2 PrPSc display unglycosylated core fragments of
21 kDa and 19 kDa, resulting from cleavage around amino

acids 82 and 97, respectively.

Methods We generated anti-PrP monoclonal antibodies to
epitopes immediately preceding the differential proteinase

K cleavage sites. These antibodies, which were
designated POM2 and POM12, recognise type 1, but not
type 2, PrPSc.

Findings We studied 114 brain samples from 70 patients
with sporadic CJD and three patients with variant CJD.

Every patient classified as CJD type 2, and all variant
CJD patients, showed POM2/POM12 reactivity in the

cerebellum and other PrPSc-rich brain areas, with a
typical PrPSc type 1 migration pattern.

Interpretation The regular coexistence of multiple
PrPSc types in patients with CJD casts doubts on the
validity of

electrophoretic PrPSc mobilities as surrogates for
prion strains, and questions the rational basis of
current CJD

classifications.


snip...


The above results set the existing CJD classifications

into debate and introduce interesting questions about

human CJD types. For example, do human prion types

exist in a dynamic equilibrium in the brains of affected

individuals? Do they coexist in most or even all CJD

cases? Is the biochemically identified PrPSc type simply

the dominant type, and not the only PrPSc species?


Published online October 31, 2005


http://neurology.thelancet.com



Detection of Type 1 Prion Protein in Variant

Creutzfeldt-Jakob Disease

Helen M. Yull,* Diane L. Ritchie,*

Jan P.M. Langeveld,? Fred G. van Zijderveld,?

Moira E. Bruce,? James W. Ironside,* and

Mark W. Head*

From the National CJD Surveillance Unit,* School of
Molecular

and Clinical Medicine, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh,

United Kingdom; Central Institute for Animal Disease
Control

(CIDC)-Lelystad, ? Lelystad, The Netherlands; Institute
for Animal

Health, Neuropathogenesis Unit, ? Edinburgh, United Kingdom

Molecular typing of the abnormal form of the prion

protein (PrPSc) has come to be regarded as a powerful

tool in the investigation of the prion diseases. All
evidence

thus far presented indicates a single PrPSc molecular

type in variant Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease (termed

type 2B), presumably resulting from infection with a

single strain of the agent (bovine spongiform
encephalopathy).

Here we show for the first time that the PrPSc

that accumulates in the brain in variant Creutzfeldt-

Jakob disease also contains a minority type 1 component.

This minority type 1 PrPSc was found in all 21

cases of variant Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease tested,
irrespective

of brain region examined, and was also

present in the variant Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease tonsil.

The quantitative balance between PrPSc types was maintained

when variant Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease was

transmitted to wild-type mice and was also found in

bovine spongiform encephalopathy cattle brain, indicating

that the agent rather than the host specifies their

relative representation. These results indicate that PrPSc

molecular typing is based on quantitative rather than

qualitative phenomena and point to a complex relationship

between prion protein biochemistry, disease phenotype

and agent strain. (Am J Pathol 2006, 168:151-157;

DOI: 10.2353/ajpath.2006.050766)


snip...


Discussion

In the apparent absence of a foreign nucleic acid genome

associated with the agents responsible for transmissible

spongiform encephalopathies or prion diseases,

efforts to provide a molecular definition of agent strain

have focused on biochemical differences in the abnormal,

disease-associated form of the prion protein, termed

PrPSc. Differences in PrPSc conformation and glycosylation

have been proposed to underlie disease phenotype

and form the biochemical basis of agent strain. This

proposal has found support in the observation that the

major phenotypic subtypes of sCJD appear to correlate

with the presence of either type 1 or type 2 PrPSc in

combination with the presence of either methionine or

valine at codon 129 of the prion protein gene.2 Similarly,

the PrPSc type associated with vCJD correlates with the

presence of type 2 PrPSc and is distinct from that found in

sCJD because of a characteristically high occupancy of

both N-linked glycosylation sites (type 2B).6,11 The

means by which such conformational difference is detected

is somewhat indirect; relying on the action of proteases,

primarily proteinase K, to degrade the normal

Figure 6. Type 1 PrPSc is a stable minority component
of PrPSc from the vCJD

brain. Western blot analysis of PrP in a sample of
cerebral cortex from a
case

of vCJD during digestion with proteinase K is shown.
Time points assayed

are indicated in minutes (T0, 5, 10, 30, 60, 120, 180).
Duplicate blots were

probed with 3F4, which detects both type 1 and type 2
PrPSc, and with 12B2,

which detects type 1. The insert shows a shorter
exposure of the same time

course study from a separate experiment also probed
with 3F4. Both blots

included samples of cerebral cortex from a case of
sporadic CJD MM1 (Type

1) and molecular weight markers (Markers) indicate
weights in kd.

Figure 7. A minority type 1-like PrPSc is found in vCJD
tonsil, vCJD
transmitted

to mice and in BSE. Western blot analysis of PrPSc in a
concentrated

sample of tonsil from a case of vCJD (Tonsil), in a
concentrated brain
sample

of a wild-type mouse (C57BL) infected with vCJD and in
a sample of cattle

BSE brain (BSE) is shown. Tissue extracts were digested
with proteinase K.

Duplicate blots were probed with either 3F4 or 6H4,
both of which detect

type 1 and type 2 PrPSc, and with 12B2, which detects
type 1. The blots

included samples of cerebral cortex from a case of
sporadic CJD MM1 (Type

1) and molecular weight markers (Markers) indicate
weights in kd.

Type 1 PrPSc in Variant Creutzfeldt-Jakob Disease 155

AJP January 2006, Vol. 168, No. 1

cellular form of PrP and produce a protease-resistant

core fragment of PrPSc that differs in the extent of its

N-terminal truncation according to the original

conformation.

A complication has recently arisen with the finding that

both type 1 and type 2 can co-exist in the brains of

patients with sCJD.2,5-8 More recently this same phenomenon

has been demonstrated in patients with iatrogenically

acquired and familial forms of human prion disease.

9,10 The existence of this phenomenon is now

beyond doubt but its prevalence and its biological
significance

remain a matter of debate.

Conventional Western blot analysis using antibodies

that detect type 1 and type 2 PrPSc has severe quantitative

limitations for the co-detection of type 1 and type 2

PrPSc in individual samples, suggesting that the prevalence

of co-occurrence of the two types might be underestimated.

We have sought to circumvent this problem by

using an antibody that is type 1-specific and applied this

to the sole remaining human prion disease where the

phenomenon of mixed PrPSc types has not yet been

shown, namely vCJD.

These results show that even in vCJD where susceptible

individuals have been infected supposedly by a

single strain of agent, both PrPSc types co-exist: a
situation

reminiscent of that seen when similarly discriminant

antibodies were used to analyze experimental BSE in

sheep.14,17 In sporadic and familial CJD, individual

brains can show a wide range of relative amounts of the

two types in samples from different regions, but where

brains have been thoroughly investigated a predominant

type is usually evident.2,6,10 This differs from this
report

on vCJD, where type 1 is present in all samples
investigated

but always as a minor component that never

reaches a level at which it is detectable without a type

1-specific antibody. It would appear that the relative
balance

between type 1 and type 2 is controlled within

certain limits in the vCJD brain. A minority type-1-like

band is also detected by 12B2 in vCJD tonsil, in BSE

brain and in the brains of mice experimentally infected

with vCJD, suggesting that this balance of types is agent,

rather than host or tissue, specific. Interestingly the
"glycoform

signature" of the type 2 PrPSc found in vCJD (type

2B) is also seen in the type 1 PrPSc components, suggesting

that it could legitimately be termed type 1B.

PrPSc isotype analysis has proven to be extremely

useful in the differential diagnosis of CJD and is
likely to

continue to have a major role in the investigation of human

prion diseases. However, it is clear, on the basis of

these findings, that molecular typing has quantitative
limitations

and that any mechanistic explanation of prion

replication and the molecular basis of agent strain
variation

must accommodate the co-existence of multiple

prion protein conformers. Whether or not the different

conformers we describe here correlate in a simple and

direct way with agent strain remains to be determined. In

principle two interpretations present themselves: either

the two conformers can be produced by a single strain of

agent or vCJD (and, therefore, presumably BSE) results

from a mixture of strains, one of which generally
predominates.

Evidence for the isolation in mice of more than one

strain from individual isolates of BSE has been presented

previously.18,19

One practical consequence of our findings is that the

correct interpretation of transmission studies will depend

on a full examination of the balance of molecular types

present in the inoculum used to transmit disease, in
addition

to a thorough analysis of the molecular types that

arise in the recipients. Another consequence relates to

the diagnostic certainty of relying on PrPSc molecular

type alone when considering the possibility of BSE
infection

or secondary transmission in humans who have a

genotype other than methionine at codon 129 of the

PRNP gene. In this context it is interesting to note
that this

minority type 1B component resembles the type 5 PrPSc

described previously to characterize vCJD transmission

into certain humanized PRNP129VV transgenic mouse

models.12,20 This apparently abrupt change in molecular

phenotype might represent a selection process imposed

by this particular transgenic mouse model. Irrespective of

whether this proves to be the case, the results shown

here point to further complexities in the relationship
between

the physico-chemical properties of the prion protein,

human disease phenotype, and prion agent strain.

Acknowledgments


snip...


Type 1 PrPSc in Variant Creutzfeldt-Jakob Disease 157

AJP January 2006, Vol. 168, No. 1 ...TSS



http://ajp.amjpathol.org/cgi/content/ab ... HITS=10&hi
ts=10&RESULTFORMAT=&fulltext=prion&searchid=1136646133963_237&FIRSTINDEX=0&v
olume=168&issue=1&journalcode=amjpathol




Neuropathology and Applied Neurobiology

(2005),

31

, 565-579 doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2990.2005.00697.x

© 2005 Blackwell Publishing Ltd

565

Blackwell Science, LtdOxford, UKNANNeuropathology and
Applied Neurobiology0305-1846Blackwell Publishing Ltd, 2005

316565579

Review article

Phenotypic variability in human prion diseases

J. W. Ironside, D. L. Ritchie and M. W. Head

National Creutzfeldt-Jakob Disease Surveillance Unit,
Division of Pathology, University of Edinburgh,
Edinburgh, UK

J. W. Ironside, D. L. Ritchie and M. W. Head (2005)

Neuropathology and Applied Neurobiology

31,

565-579

Phenotypic variability in human prion diseases

Human prion diseases are rare neurodegenerative disorders

that can occur as sporadic, familial or acquired disorders.

Within each of these categories there is a wide range

of phenotypic variation that is not encountered in other

neurodegenerative disorders. The identification of the

prion protein and its key role in the pathogenesis of this

diverse group of diseases has allowed a fuller
understanding

of factors that influence disease phenotype. In particular,

the naturally occurring polymorphism at codon 129

in the prion protein gene has a major influence on the
disease

phenotype in sporadic, familial and acquired prion

diseases, although the underlying mechanisms remain

unclear. Recent technical advances have improved our

ability to study the isoforms of the abnormal prion protein

in the brain and in other tissues. This has lead to the
concept

of molecular strain typing, in which different isoforms

of the prion protein are proposed to correspond to

individual strains of the transmissible agent, each with

specific biological properties. In sporadic
Creutzfeldt-Jakob

disease there are at least six major combinations of codon

129 genotype and prion protein isotype, which appear to

relate to distinctive clinical subgroups of this disease.

However, these relationships are proving to be more complex

than first considered, particularly in cases with more

than a single prion protein isotype in the brain. Further

work is required to clarify these relationships and to

explain the mechanism of neuropathological targeting of

specific brain regions, which accounts for the diversity of

clinical features within human prion diseases.


© 2005 Blackwell Publishing Ltd, Neuropathology and
Applied Neurobiology, 31, 565-579


BSE prions propagate as either variant CJD-like or

sporadic CJD-like prion strains in transgenic mice

expressing human prion protein


The EMBO Journal Vol. 21 No. 23 pp. 6358±6366, 2002


Emmanuel A.Asante, Jacqueline M.Linehan,

Melanie Desbruslais, Susan Joiner,

Ian Gowland, Andrew L.Wood, Julie Welch,

Andrew F.Hill, Sarah E.Lloyd,

Jonathan D.F.Wadsworth and

John Collinge1

MRC Prion Unit and Department of Neurodegenerative Disease,

Institute of Neurology, University College, Queen Square,

London WC1N 3BG, UK

1Corresponding author

e-mail: [email protected]


Variant Creutzfeldt±Jakob disease (vCJD) has been

recognized to date only in individuals homozygous for

methionine at PRNP codon 129. Here we show that

transgenic mice expressing human PrP methionine

129, inoculated with either bovine spongiform

encephalopathy (BSE) or variant CJD prions, may

develop the neuropathological and molecular phenotype

of vCJD, consistent with these diseases being

caused by the same prion strain. Surprisingly, however,

BSE transmission to these transgenic mice, in

addition to producing a vCJD-like phenotype, can also

result in a distinct molecular phenotype that is
indistinguishable

from that of sporadic CJD with PrPSc

type 2. These data suggest that more than one BSEderived

prion strain might infect humans; it is therefore

possible that some patients with a phenotype consistent

with sporadic CJD may have a disease arising

from BSE exposure.


snip...


These studies further strengthen the evidence that vCJD

is caused by a BSE-like prion strain. Also, remarkably, the

key neuropathological hallmark of vCJD, the presence of

abundant ¯orid PrP plaques, can be recapitulated on BSE

or vCJD transmission to these mice. However, the most

surprising aspect of the studies was the ®nding that an

alternate pattern of disease can be induced in 129MM

Tg35 mice from primary transmission of BSE, with a

molecular phenotype indistinguishable from that of a
subtype

of sporadic CJD. This ®nding has important potential

implications as it raises the possibility that some humans

infected with BSE prions may develop a clinical disease

indistinguishable from classical CJD associated with type 2

PrPSc. This is, in our experience, the commonest molecular

sub-type of sporadic CJD. In this regard, it is of interest

that the reported incidence of sporadic CJD has risen
in the

UK since the 1970s (Cousens et al., 1997). This has been

attributed to improved case ascertainment, particularly as

much of the rise is reported from elderly patients and

similar rises in incidence were noted in other European

countries without reported BSE (Will et al., 1998).

However, it is now clear that BSE is present in many

European countries, albeit at a much lower incidence than

was seen in the UK. While improved ascertainment is

likely to be a major factor in this rise, that some of
these

additional cases may be related to BSE exposure cannot be

ruled out. It is of interest in this regard that a 2-fold

increase in the reported incidence of sporadic CJD in 2001

has recently been reported for Switzerland, a country that

had the highest incidence of cattle BSE in continental

Europe between 1990 and 2002 (Glatzel et al., 2002). No

epidemiological case±control studies with strati®cation of

CJD cases by molecular sub-type have yet been reported.

It will be important to review the incidence of sporadic

CJD associated with PrPSc type 2 and other molecular
subtypes

in both BSE-affected and unaffected countries in the


light of these ®ndings. If human BSE prion infection can

result in propagation of type 2 PrPSc, it would be expected

that such cases would be indistinguishable on clinical,

pathological and molecular criteria from classical CJD. It

may also be expected that such prions would behave

biologically like those isolated from humans with sporadic

CJD with type 2 PrPSc. The transmission properties of

prions associated with type 2 PrPSc from BSE-inoculated

129MM Tg35 mice are being investigated by serial

passage.

We consider these data inconsistent with contamination

of some of the 129MM Tg35 mice with sporadic CJD

prions. These transmission studies were performed according

to rigorous biosafety protocols for preparation of

inocula and both the inoculation and care of mice, which

are all uniquely identi®ed by sub-cutaneous transponders.

However, crucially, the same BSE inocula have been used

on 129VV Tg152 and 129MM Tg45 mice, which are

highly sensitive to sporadic CJD but in which such

transmissions producing type 2 PrPSc were not observed.

Furthermore, in an independent experiment, separate

inbred lines of wild-type mice, which are highly resistant

to sporadic CJD prions, also propagated two distinctive

PrPSc types on challenge with either BSE or vCJD. No

evidence of spontaneous prion disease or PrPSc has been

seen in groups of uninoculated or mock-inoculated aged

129MM Tg35 mice.

While distinctive prion isolates have been derived from

BSE passage in mice previously (designated 301C and

301V), these, in contrast to the data presented here, are

propagated in mice expressing different prion proteins

(Bruce et al., 1994). It is unclear whether our ®ndings

indicate the existence of more than one prion strain in

individual cattle with BSE, with selection and preferential

replication of distinct strains by different hosts, or that

`mutation' of a unitary BSE strain occurs in some types of

host. Western blot analysis of single BSE isolates has not

shown evidence of the presence of a proportion of

monoglycosylated dominant PrPSc type in addition to the

diglycosylated dominant pattern (data not shown).

Extensive strain typing of large numbers of individual

BSE-infected cattle either by biological or molecular

methods has not been reported.

Presumably, the different genetic background of the

different inbred mouse lines is crucial in determining

which prion strain propagates on BSE inoculation. The

transgenic mice described here have a mixed genetic

background with contributions from FVB/N, C57BL/6 and

129Sv inbred lines; each mouse will therefore have a

different genetic background. This may explain the

differing response of individual 129MM Tg35 mice, and

the difference between 129MM Tg35 and 129MM Tg45

mice, which are, like all transgenic lines, populations

derived from single founders. Indeed, the consistent

distinctive strain propagation in FVB and C57BL/6 versus

SJL and RIIIS lines may allow mapping of genes relevant

to strain selection and propagation, and these studies
are in

progress.

That different prion strains can be consistently isolated

in different inbred mouse lines challenged with BSE

prions argues that other species exposed to BSE may

develop prion diseases that are not recognizable as being

caused by the BSE strain by either biological or molecular

strain typing methods. As with 129MM Tg35 mice, the

prions replicating in such transmissions may be
indistinguishable

from naturally occurring prion strains. It

remains of considerable concern whether BSE has transmitted

to, and is being maintained in, European sheep

¯ocks. Given the diversity of sheep breeds affected by

scrapie, it has to be considered that some sheep might have

become infected with BSE, but propagated a distinctive

strain type indistinguishable from those of natural sheep

scrapie. ...


The EMBO Journal Vol. 21 No. 23 pp. 6358±6366, 2002

6358 ãEuropean Molecular Biology Organization



http://embojournal.npgjournals.com/cgi/ ... 21/23/6358


J Neuropsychiatry Clin Neurosci 17:489-495, November 2005
doi: 10.1176/appi.neuropsych.17.4.489
© 2005 American Psychiatric Publishing, Inc.


Psychiatric Manifestations of Creutzfeldt-Jakob
Disease: A 25-Year Analysis
Christopher A. Wall, M.D., Teresa A. Rummans, M.D.,
Allen J. Aksamit, M.D.,
Lois E. Krahn, M.D. and V. Shane Pankratz, Ph.D.
Received April 20, 2004; revised September 9, 2004;
accepted September 13,
2004. From the Mayo Clinic, Department of Psychiatry
and Psychology,
Rochester, Minnesota; Mayo Clinic, Department of
Neurology, Rochester,
Minnesota. Address correspondence to Dr. Wall, Mayo
Clinic, Department of
Psychiatry and Psychology, Mayo Building-W11A, 200
First St., SW, Rochester,
MN 55905; [email protected] (E-mail).

This study characterizes the type and timing of
psychiatric manifestations
in sporadic Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease (sCJD).
Historically, sCJD has been
characterized by prominent neurological symptoms, while
the variant form
(vCJD) is described as primarily psychiatric in
presentation and course: A
retrospective review of 126 sCJD patients evaluated at
the Mayo Clinic from
1976-2001 was conducted. Cases were reviewed for
symptoms of depression,
anxiety, psychosis, behavior dyscontrol, sleep
disturbances, and
neurological signs during the disease course. Eighty
percent of the cases
demonstrated psychiatric symptoms within the first 100
days of illness, with
26% occurring at presentation. The most commonly
reported symptoms in this
population included sleep disturbances, psychotic
symptoms, and depression.
Psychiatric manifestations are an early and prominent
feature of sporadic
CJD, often occurring prior to formal diagnosis.


snip...


CONCLUSIONS

Historically, psychiatric manifestations have been
described as a relatively
infrequent occurrence in the sporadic form of
creutzfeldt-Jakob disease.
However, our findings suggest otherwise. In this study,
a vast majority of
the cases were noted to have at least one psychiatric
symptom during the
course of illness, with nearly one-quarter occurring in
the prodromal or
presenting phase of the illness. After comparing the
frequency of
neuropsychiatric symptoms in sporadic CJD to studies
describing the variant
form of CJD, we found that there are fewer clinical
differences than
previously reported.5-7 While the age of patients
with vCJD presentation
is significantly younger and the course of illness is
longer, the type and
timing of psychiatric manifestations appear similar
between these two
diseases. ...snip...


http://neuro.psychiatryonline.org/cgi/c ... t/17/4/489



Polish Journal of Neurology and Neurosurgery 6/2005

abstract:


CASE REPORT
Mental disorders in a female patient with probable Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease

Neurol Neurochirur Pol 2005; 39, 6: 520–523


authors: Marek Gronkowski, Bozena Spila, Alina Nowicka, Piotr Machala,
Grzegorz Przywara,


The paper presents an overview of the current knowledge about the etiology,
classification of Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease, abnormalities in the results of
the EEG, MR and laboratory examinations in patients with this disease. The
diagnostic value of the CSF examination for presence of protein 14-3-3 is
underlined. The article is based on both Polish and foreign literature,
describing mainly the diagnostics of CJD. The case of a female patient with
dementia, mental disorders and neurological symptoms in the course of
probable CJD, who was hospitalized at the Psychogeriatric Department of the
Neuropsychiatric Hospital in Lublin is described.


Polish Journal of Neurology and Neurosurgery 6/2005


full text of the article:




http://www.termedia.pl/showpdf.php?arti ... enia%20psy
ch.pdf&priority=1





First case of vCJD reported in a Japanese patient: update

Editorial team ([email protected]), Eurosurveillance
editorial office

A detailed description of the first case of variant Creutzfeldt-Jakob
disease (vCJD) in Japan, originally reported in February 2005, has just been
published [1,2]. The patient was a 51 year old man, who had spent around 24
days in the United Kingdom in 1990, during the bovine spongiform
encephalopathy (BSE) outbreak. He is known to have eaten mechanically
recovered meat during his visit, and although exposure in other European
countries he visited, including France and Japan, cannot be excluded, it is
thought that he may have been exposed to the BSE agent during his UK visit.
If exposure in the UK was the source of his infection, then the incubation
period to illness onset was 11.5 years.

It is also noted that the patient's illness duration was unusually long, at
42 months, and that periodic synchronous discharges (PSD), which have not
been reported in other vCJD cases, appeared on the patient's
electroencephalogram, 12 months before death. The working group reporting on
the case suggest that the World Health Organization vCJD case definition [3]
be revised to state that PSD does not exclude the possibility of vCJD.

This article is adapted from reference 1


References:
Yamada M, Variant CJD Working Group. The first Japanese case of variant
Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease showing periodic electroencephalogram. Lancet
2006; 367: 874.
Eurosurveillance. First case of vCJD reported in a Japanese patient.
Eurosurveillance 2005; 10(2): 050210.
(http://www.eurosurveillance.org/ew/2005/050210.asp#1)
The Revision of the Surveillance Case Definition for Variant
Creutzfeldt-Jakob Disease (vCJD). Report of a WHO consultation, Edinburgh,
United Kingdom 17 May 2001. WHO/CDS/CSR/EPH/2001.5. Geneva: World Health
Organization; 2001
(http://www.who.int/csr/resources/public ... h20015.pdf)


http://www.eurosurveillance.org/ew/2006/060316.asp#3



Personal Communication


-------- Original Message --------



Subject: re-BSE prions propagate as

either variant CJD-like or sporadic CJD Date: Thu, 28
Nov 2002 10:23:43

-0000 From: "Asante, Emmanuel A" To:
"'[email protected]'"

Dear Terry,

I have been asked by Professor Collinge to respond to
your request. I am

a Senior Scientist in the MRC Prion Unit and the lead
author on the

paper. I have attached a pdf copy of the paper for your
attention. Thank

you for your interest in the paper.

In respect of your first question, the simple answer
is, yes. As you

will find in the paper, we have managed to associate
the alternate

phenotype to type 2 PrPSc, the commonest sporadic CJD.

It is too early to be able to claim any further
sub-classification in

respect of Heidenhain variant CJD or Vicky Rimmer's
version. It will

take further studies, which are on-going, to establish
if there are

sub-types to our initial finding which we are now
reporting. The main

point of the paper is that, as well as leading to the
expected new

variant CJD phenotype, BSE transmission to the
129-methionine genotype

can lead to an alternate phenotype which is
indistinguishable from type

2 PrPSc.



I hope reading the paper will enlighten you more on the
subject. If I

can be of any further assistance please to not hesitate
to ask. Best wishes.



Emmanuel Asante

<> ____________________________________

Dr. Emmanuel A Asante MRC Prion Unit & Neurogenetics
Dept. Imperial

College School of Medicine (St. Mary's) Norfolk Place,
LONDON W2 1PG

Tel: +44 (0)20 7594 3794 Fax: +44 (0)20 7706 3272 email:

[email protected] (until 9/12/02)

New e-mail: [email protected] (active from now)

____________________________________


Human Prion Protein with

Valine 129 Prevents Expression

of Variant CJD Phenotype


Jonathan D. F. Wadsworth, Emmanuel A. Asante,

Melanie Desbruslais, Jacqueline M. Linehan, Susan Joiner,

Ian Gowland, Julie Welch, Lisa Stone, Sarah E. Lloyd,

Andrew F. Hill,* Sebastian Brandner, John Collinge.

Variant Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease (vCJD) is a unique
and highly distinctive

clinicopathological and molecular phenotype of human
prion disease

associated with infection with bovine spongiform
encephalopathy (BSE)-like

prions. Here, we found that generation of this
phenotype in transgenic mice

required expression of human prion protein (PrP) with
methionine 129.

Expression of human PrP with valine 129 resulted in a
distinct phenotype and,

remarkably, persistence of a barrier to transmission of
BSE-derived prions on

subpassage. Polymorphic residue 129 of human PrP
dictated propagation of

distinct prion strains after BSE prion infection. Thus,
primary and secondary

human infection with BSE-derived prions may result in
sporadic CJD-like or

novel phenotypes in addition to vCJD, depending on the
genotype of the prion

source and the recipient.


snip...


3 DECEMBER 2004 VOL 306 SCIENCE


http://www.sciencemag.org


Characterization of two distinct prion strains

derived from bovine spongiform encephalopathy

transmissions to inbred mice


Sarah E. Lloyd, Jacqueline M. Linehan, Melanie Desbruslais,

Susan Joiner, Jennifer Buckell, Sebastian Brandner,

Jonathan D. F. Wadsworth and John Collinge

Correspondence

John Collinge

[email protected]

MRC Prion Unit and Department of Neurodegenerative
Disease, Institute of Neurology,

University College, London WC1N 3BG, UK

Received 9 December 2003

Accepted 27 April 2004

Distinct prion strains can be distinguished by
differences in incubation period, neuropathology

and biochemical properties of disease-associated prion
protein (PrPSc) in inoculated mice.

Reliable comparisons of mouse prion strain properties
can only be achieved after passage in

genetically identical mice, as host prion protein
sequence and genetic background are known

to modulate prion disease phenotypes. While multiple
prion strains have been identified in

sheep scrapie and Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease, bovine
spongiform encephalopathy (BSE) is

thought to be caused by a single prion strain. Primary
passage of BSE prions to different lines

of inbred mice resulted in the propagation of two
distinct PrPSc types, suggesting that two

prion strains may have been isolated. To investigate
this further, these isolates were

subpassaged in a single line of inbred mice (SJL) and
it was confirmed that two distinct prion

strains had been identified. MRC1 was characterized by
a short incubation time (110±3 days),

a mono-glycosylated-dominant PrPSc type and a
generalized diffuse pattern of PrP-immunoreactive

deposits, while MRC2 displayed a much longer incubation
time (155±1 days),

a di-glycosylated-dominant PrPSc type and a distinct
pattern of PrP-immunoreactive deposits

and neuronal loss. These data indicate a crucial
involvement of the host genome in modulating

prion strain selection and propagation in mice. It is
possible that multiple disease phenotypes

may also be possible in BSE prion infection in humans
and other animals.


snip...


Journal of General Virology (2004), 85, 2471-2478 DOI
10.1099/vir.0.79889-0


http://vir.sgmjournals.org/cgi/content/ ... /85/8/2471



Medical Sciences
Identification of a second bovine amyloidotic
spongiform encephalopathy: Molecular similarities with
sporadic Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease

Cristina Casalone *, Gianluigi Zanusso , Pierluigi
Acutis *, Sergio Ferrari , Lorenzo Capucci , Fabrizio
Tagliavini ¶, Salvatore Monaco ||, and Maria Caramelli *

*Centro di Referenza Nazionale per le Encefalopatie
Animali, Istituto Zooprofilattico Sperimentale del
Piemonte, Liguria e Valle d'Aosta, Via Bologna, 148,
10195 Turin, Italy; Department of Neurological and
Visual Science, Section of Clinical Neurology,
Policlinico G.B. Rossi, Piazzale L.A. Scuro, 10, 37134
Verona, Italy; Istituto Zooprofilattico Sperimentale
della Lombardia ed Emilia Romagna, Via Bianchi, 9,
25124 Brescia, Italy; and ¶Istituto Nazionale
Neurologico "Carlo Besta," Via Celoria 11, 20133 Milan,
Italy


Edited by Stanley B. Prusiner, University of
California, San Francisco, CA, and approved December
23, 2003 (received for review September 9, 2003)

Transmissible spongiform encephalopathies (TSEs), or
prion diseases, are mammalian neurodegenerative
disorders characterized by a posttranslational
conversion and brain accumulation of an insoluble,
protease-resistant isoform (PrPSc) of the host-encoded
cellular prion protein (PrPC). Human and animal TSE
agents exist as different phenotypes that can be
biochemically differentiated on the basis of the
molecular mass of the protease-resistant PrPSc
fragments and the degree of glycosylation.
Epidemiological, molecular, and transmission studies
strongly suggest that the single strain of agent
responsible for bovine spongiform encephalopathy (BSE)
has infected humans, causing variant Creutzfeldt-Jakob
disease. The unprecedented biological properties of the
BSE agent, which circumvents the so-called "species
barrier" between cattle and humans and adapts to
different mammalian species, has raised considerable
concern for human health. To date, it is unknown
whether more than one strain might be responsible for
cattle TSE or whether the BSE agent undergoes
phenotypic variation after natural transmission. Here
we provide evidence of a second cattle TSE. The
disorder was pathologically characterized by the
presence of PrP-immunopositive amyloid plaques, as
opposed to the lack of amyloid deposition in typical
BSE cases, and by a different pattern of regional
distribution and topology of brain PrPSc accumulation.
In addition, Western blot analysis showed a PrPSc type
with predominance of the low molecular mass glycoform
and a protease-resistant fragment of lower molecular
mass than BSE-PrPSc. Strikingly, the molecular
signature of this previously undescribed bovine PrPSc
was similar to that encountered in a distinct subtype
of sporadic Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease.



----------------------------------------------------------------------------
----

C.C. and G.Z. contributed equally to this work.

||To whom correspondence should be addressed.

E-mail: [email protected] .

http://www.pnas.org/cgi/doi/10.1073/pnas.0305777101


snip...


Phenotypic Similarities Between BASE and sCJD. The
transmissibility

of CJD brains was initially demonstrated in primates
(27), and

classification of atypical cases as CJD was based on
this property

(28). To date, no systematic studies of strain typing
in sCJD have

been provided, and classification of different subtypes
is based

on clinical, neuropathological, and molecular features
(the polymorphic

PRNP codon 129 and the PrPSc glycotype) (8, 9, 15, 19).

The importance of molecular PrPSc characterization in
assessing

the identity of TSE strains is underscored by several
studies,

showing that the stability of given disease-specific
PrPSc types is

maintained upon experimental propagation of sCJD, familial

CJD, and vCJD isolates in transgenic PrP-humanized mice (8,

29). Similarly, biochemical properties of BSE- and
vCJDassociated

PrPSc molecules remain stable after passage to mice

expressing bovine PrP (30). Recently, however, it has been

reported that PrP-humanized mice inoculated with BSE
tissues

may also propagate a distinctive PrPSc type, with a
''monoglycosylated-

dominant'' pattern and electrophoretic mobility of the

unglycosylated fragment slower than that of vCJD and
BSE (31).

Strikingly, this PrPSc type shares its molecular
properties with the

a PrPSc molecule found in classical sCJD. This
observation is at

variance with the PrPSc type found in MV2 sCJD cases and in

cattle BASE, showing a monoglycosylated-dominant
pattern but

faster electrophoretic mobility of the
protease-resistant fragment

as compared with BSE. In addition to molecular properties

of PrPSc, BASE and MV2 sCJD share a distinctive pattern of

intracerebral PrP deposition, which occurs as
plaque-like and

amyloid-kuru plaques. Differences were, however,
observed in

the regional distribution of PrPSc. While inMV2 sCJD
cases the

largest amounts of PrPSc were detected in the cerebellum,

brainstem, and striatum, in cattle BASE these areas
were less

involved and the highest levels of PrPSc were recovered
from the

thalamus and olfactory regions.

In conclusion, decoding the biochemical PrPSc signature of

individual human and animal TSE strains may allow the
identification

of potential risk factors for human disorders with

unknown etiology, such as sCJD. However, although BASE and

sCJD share several characteristics, caution is dictated
in assessing

a link between conditions affecting two different mammalian

species, based on convergent biochemical properties of
diseaseassociated

PrPSc types. Strains of TSE agents may be better

characterized upon passage to transgenic mice. In the
interim

until this is accomplished, our present findings
suggest a strict

epidemiological surveillance of cattle TSE and sCJD
based on

molecular criteria.


http://www.pnas.org/cgi/reprint/0305777101v1



Published online before print March 20, 2001,
10.1073/pnas.041490898

Neurobiology
Adaptation of the bovine spongiform encephalopathy
agent to primates and comparison with Creutzfeldt-
Jakob disease: Implications for human health
Corinne Ida Lasmézas*,, Jean-Guy Fournier*, Virginie
Nouvel*, Hermann Boe*, Domíníque Marcé*, François
Lamoury*, Nicolas Kopp, Jean-Jacques Hauw§, James
Ironside¶, Moira Bruce, Dominique Dormont*, and
Jean-Philippe Deslys*

* Commissariat à l'Energie Atomique, Service de
Neurovirologie, Direction des Sciences du
Vivant/Département de Recherche Medicale, Centre de
Recherches du Service de Santé des Armées 60-68, Avenue
du Général Leclerc, BP 6, 92 265 Fontenay-aux-Roses
Cedex, France; Hôpital Neurologique Pierre Wertheimer,
59, Boulevard Pinel, 69003 Lyon, France; § Laboratoire
de Neuropathologie, Hôpital de la Salpêtrière, 83,
Boulevard de l'Hôpital, 75013 Paris, France; ¶
Creutzfeldt-Jakob Disease Surveillance Unit, Western
General Hospital, Crewe Road, Edinburgh EH4 2XU, United
Kingdom; and Institute for Animal Health,
Neuropathogenesis Unit, West Mains Road, Edinburgh EH9
3JF, United Kingdom

Edited by D. Carleton Gajdusek, Centre National de la
Recherche Scientifique, Gif-sur-Yvette, France, and
approved December 7, 2000 (received for review October
16, 2000)


Abstract


There is substantial scientific evidence to support the
notion that bovine spongiform encephalopathy (BSE) has
contaminated human beings, causing variant
Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease (vCJD). This disease has
raised concerns about the possibility of an iatrogenic
secondary transmission to humans, because the
biological properties of the primate-adapted BSE agent
are unknown. We show that (i) BSE can be transmitted
from primate to primate by intravenous route in 25
months, and (ii) an iatrogenic transmission of vCJD to
humans could be readily recognized pathologically,
whether it occurs by the central or peripheral route.
Strain typing in mice demonstrates that the BSE agent
adapts to macaques in the same way as it does to humans
and confirms that the BSE agent is responsible for vCJD
not only in the United Kingdom but also in France. The
agent responsible for French iatrogenic growth
hormone-linked CJD taken as a control is very different
from vCJD but is similar to that found in one case of
sporadic CJD and one sheep scrapie isolate. These data
will be key in identifying the origin of human cases of
prion disease, including accidental vCJD transmission,
and could provide bases for vCJD risk assessment.


snip...


Characterization of the CJD and Scrapie Strains.
Controls were set up by transmitting one French and one
U.S. scrapie isolate from ruminants as well as French
sCJD and iCJD cases from humans. None of these revealed
a lesion profile or transmission characteristics
similar or close to those of BSE or vCJD, respectively,
thus extending to the present French scrapie isolate
the previous observation that the BSE agent was
different from all known natural scrapie strains (4, 24).

The lesion profiles of sCJD and iCJD differed only
slightly in severity of the lesions, but not in shape
of the profile, revealing the identity of the causative
agents. One of us reported the absence of similarity
between sCJD (six cases) and U.K. scrapie (eight cases)
in transmission characteristics in mice (4). Herein, we
made the striking observation that the French natural
scrapie strain (but not the U.S. scrapie strain) has
the same lesion profile and transmission times in
C57BL/6 mice as do the two human TSE strains studied.
This strain "affiliation" was confirmed biochemically.
There is no epidemiological evidence for a link between
sheep scrapie and the occurrence of CJD in humans (25).
However, such a link, if it is not a general rule,
would be extremely difficult to establish because of
the very low incidence of CJD as well as the existence
of different isolates in humans and multiple strains in
scrapie. Moreover, scrapie is transmissible to nonhuman
primates (26). Thus, there is still a possibility that
in some instances TSE strains infecting humans do share
a common origin with scrapie, as pointed out by our
findings.


snip...


http://www.pnas.org/cgi/content/full/041490898v1


May 2003


A bizarre misshapen protein

The story of the mysterious, devastating prion in a new book from Springer

In the space of 12 months, Stephen Churchill lost his focus, his memory,
most of his speech, then even the ability to dress, feed, and clean
himself. He developed an excessive fear of water and sharp objects and
refused to bathe or shave. And before long, with his unsteady gait and
his tendency to fall, he spent his days slumped in a wheelchair or
confined to a bed. To the staff of the nursing home where Stephen lived,
the relentless decline was depressingly familiar-it had the earmarks of
Alzheimer's disease. But something in the picture did not fit. The
patient, when he died, was only 19 years old.

Doctors later discovered that Stephen had succumbed to a new kind of
killer, the prion, now known to be the cause of mad cow disease in
cattle, chronic wasting disease in American deer and elk,
Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease and fatal insomnia in humans, among other
exotic ailments. Doctors and researchers have been aware of some of
these diseases for a century and more, but only in the last two decades
have scientists even begun to understand just how the pathological
protein spreads to new species and kills its victims.

In The Pathological Protein: Mad Cow, Chronic Wasting, and Other Deadly
Prion Diseases, Philip Yam describes the history of the scientific
effort to track down and understand the prion, and the medical effort,
still underway, to devise treatments for those who suffer from its ravages.

Philip Yam has been writing and editing for Scientific American since
1989 and is currently the magazine's news editor. This is his first book.


Detailed information and order possibility:

Philip Yam
The Pathological Protein

Mad Cow, Chronic Wasting, and Other Deadly Prion Diseases
2003. Hardcover, 285 pp.
Euro 29.95 (net price); £21.00; $27.50; sFr 51.50
ISBN 0-387-95508-9

Contact and review copies:

Joan Robinson
Springer-Verlag Press and Public Relations
Tel.: +49- (0) 6221-487-8130,
Fax: +49- (0) 6221-487-8141,
E-mail: [email protected]


http://www.springer.de/press/newbooks/protein.html



The Pathological Protein: Mad Cow, Chronic Wasting, and Other Deadly
Prion Diseases
Philip Yam

List Price: $27.50
Our Price: $19.25
You Save: $8.25 (30%)
Availability: Usually ships within 24 hours.


http://www.target.com/gp/detail.html/sr ... 0387955089



snip...

CHAPTER 14

Laying Odds

Are prion diseases more prevalent than we thought?
Researchers and government officials badly underestimated the threat
that mad cow disease posed when it first appeared in Britain. They
didn't think bovine spongifbrm encephalopathy was a zoonosisan
animal disease that can sicken people. The 1996 news that BSE could
infect humans with a new form of Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease stunned
the world. It also got some biomedical researchers wondering whether
sporadic CJD may really be a manifestation of a zoonotic sickness.
Might it be caused by the ingestion of prions, as variant CJD is?

Revisiting Sporadic CJD

It's not hard to get Terry Singeltary going. "I have my conspiracy theo-
ries," admitted the 49-year-old Texan.1 Singeltary is probably the
nation's most relentless consumer advocate when it comes to issues in
prion diseases. He has helped families learn about the sickness and
coordinated efforts with support groups such as CJD Voice and the
CJD Foundation. He has also connected with others who are critical of
the American way of handling the threat of prion diseases. Such critics
include Consumers Union's Michael Hansen, journalist John Stauber,
and Thomas Pringle, who used to run the voluminous http://www.mad-
cow.orgWeb site. These three lend their expertise to newspaper and
magazine stories about prion diseases, and they usually argue that
223

224 CHAPTER 14

prions represent more of a threat than people realize, and that the gov-
ernment has responded poorly to the dangers because it is more con-
cerned about protecting the beef industry than people's health.
Singeltary has similar inclinations, but unlike these men, he doesn't
have the professional credentials behind him. He is an 11-grade
dropout, a machinist who retired because of a neck injury sustained at
work. But you might not know that from the vast stores of information
in his mind and on his hard drive. Over the years, he has provided unac-
knowledged help to reporters around the globe, passing on files to such
big-time players as The New Tork Times, Newsweek, and USA Today. His
networking with journalists, activists, and concerned citizens has
helped medical authorities make contact with suspected CJD victims.
He has kept scientists informed with his almost daily posting of news
items and research abstracts on electronic newsgroups, including the
bulletin board on http://www.vegsource.com and the BSE-listserv run out of
the University of Karlsruhe, Germany. His combative, blunt, opinion-
ated style sometimes borders on obsessive ranting that earns praise
from some officials and researchers but infuriates othersespecially
when he repeats his conviction that "the government has lied to us, the
feed industry has lied to usall over a buck." As evidence, Singeltary
cites the USDA's testing approach, which targets downer cows and
examined 19,900 of them in 2002. To him, the USDA should test 1 mil-
lion cattle, because the incidence of BSE may be as low as one in a mil-
lion, as it was in some European countries. That the U.S. does not, he
thinks, is a sign that the government is really not interested in finding
mad cows because of fears of an economic disaster.

Singeltary got into the field of transmissible spongiform encepha-
lopathy in 1997, just after his mother died of sporadic CJD. She had an
especially aggressive versionthe Heidenhain variantthat first
causes the patient to go blind and then to deteriorate rapidly She died
just ten weeks after her symptoms began. Singeltary, who said he had
watched his grandparents die of cancer, considered her death by CJD
to be much, much worse: "It's something you never forget." Her uncon-
trollable muscle twitching became so bad "that it took three of us to
hold her one time," Singeltary recalled. "She did everything but levitate
in bed and spin her head." Doctors originally diagnosed Alzheimer's
disease, but a postmortem neuropathological exam demanded by
Singeltary revealed the true nature other death.

Laying Odds 225

Classifying a disease as "sporadic" is another way for doctors to say
they don't know the cause. Normal prion proteins just turn rogue in the
brain for no apparent reason. The term "sporadic" is often particularly
hard for the victims' families to accept, especially when the patient was
previously in robust health. Maybe it was something in the water, they
wonder, or in the air, or something they atethe same questions CJD
researchers tried to answer decades ago. The names "sporadic CJD"
and "variant CJD" also confuse the public and raise suspicions that U.S.
authorities are hiding something when they say there have been no
native variant CJD cases in the country.

Singeltary suspected an environmental cause in his mother's
demise  a feeling reinforced a year later when a neighbor died of spo-
radic CJD. For years, the neighbor had been taking nutritional supple-
ments that contained cow brain extracts. Researchers from the
National Institutes of Health collected samples of the supplement,
Singeltary recounted, and inoculated suspensions into mice. The mice
remained healthywhich only means that those supplement samples
tested were prion-free.

Scientists have made several attempts during the past few decades to
find a connection between sporadic CJD and the environment. Often,
these studies take the form of asking family members about CJD vic-
timstheir diet, occupation, medical history, hobbies, pets, and so
forthand comparing them with non-CJD subjects. Such case-control
CJD studies have produced some intriguingand sometimes contra-
dictoryresults. In 1985, Carleton Gajdusek and his NIH colleagues
reported a correlation between CJD and eating a lot of roast pork, ham,
hot dogs, and lamb, as well as rare meats and raw oysters.2 Yet they also
recognized that the findings were preliminary and that more studies
were needed.

Following up, Robert Will of the U.K. National CJD Surveillance
Unit and others pooled this data with those from two other case-con-
trol studies on CJD (one from Japan and one from the U.K.). In particu-
lar, they figured the so-called odds ratiocalculated by dividing the fre-
quency of a possible factor in the patient group by the frequency of the
factor in the control group. An odds ratio greater than I means that the
factor may be significant. In their study, Will and his collaborators
found an increase of CJD in people who have worked as health profes-
sionals (odds ratio of 1.5) and people who have had contact with cows

226 CHAPTER 14

(1.7) and sheep (1.6). Unfortunately, those connections were not statisti-
cally significant: The numbers of pooled patients (117) and control sub-
jects (333) were so small that the researchers felt the odds ratios needed
to reach 2.5 to 8 (depending on the assumptions) before they could be
deemed statistically significant. The only statistically significant corre-
lations they found were between CJD and a family history of either
CJD (19.1) or other psychotic disease (9.9), although the latter might
simply be correlated because psychotic disease may be an early symp-
tom of undiagnosed CJD.3 In contrast with earlier findings, the team
concluded that there was no association between sporadic CJD and the
consumption of organ meats, including brains (0.6).

Although these case-control studies shed a certain amount of light
on potential risk factors for CJD, it's impossible to draw firm conclu-
sions. Obtaining data that produces statistically meaningful results can
be difficult because of the rarity of CJD and hence the shortage of sub-
jects. Human memory is quite fragile, too, so patients' families may not
accurately recall the lifestyle and dietary habits of their loved ones over
the course of a decade or more. Consequently, researchers must cope
with data that probably contain significant biases. In a review paper on
CJD, Joe Gibbs of the NIH and Richard T.Johnson of Johns Hopkins
University concluded that "the absence of geographic differences in
incidence is more convincing evidence against major dietary factors,
since large populations eschew pork and some consume no meat or
meat products."A CJD study of lifelong vegetarians, they proposed,
could produce some interesting data.4

The inconclusive results of case-control studies do not completely
rule out the environment as a possible cause of CJD. "Dr. Prusiner's
theory does fit much of the data of spontaneous generation of [mal-
formed] PrP somewhere in the brain," Will remarkedthat is, the idea
that sporadic CJD just happens by itself falls within the realm of the
prion theory. Still, "it's very odd, if you look at all the forms of human
prion diseases there are, all of them are transmissible in the laboratory
and could be due to some sort of infectious agent."5 One of the great
difficulties, he explained, is that "given that this is a disease of an
extraordinarily long incubation period, are we really confident that we
can exclude childhood exposure that is transmitted from person to
person, as people move around? It's difficult to be sure about that."
There might a "carrier state" that leaves people healthy yet still able to

Laying Odds 227

infect others. If so, "you would never be able to identify what's causing
the spread of the disease," concluded Will, who hasn't stopped looking
for a possible environmental link. He has some preliminary data based
on studies that trace CJD victims' lives well before the time symptoms
beganup to 70 years; they suggest some degree of geographic cluster-
ing, but no obvious candidates for a source of infection.

A Case for Undercounting

The difficulty in establishing causal links in sporadic prion diseasesif
there are any in the first placeunderlines the importance of thorough
surveillance. The U.K. has an active program, and when a victim of CJD
is reported, one of Robert Will's colleagues visits and questions the
victim's family. "No one has looked for CJD systematically in the U.S.,"
the NIH's Paul Brown noted. "Ever."6 The U.S., through the Centers
for Disease Control and Prevention, has generally maintained a more
passive system, collecting information from death certificates from the
National Center for Health Statistics. Because CJD is invariably fatal,
mortality data is considered to be an effective means of tabulating
cases. The CDC assessed the accuracy of such data by comparing the
numbers with figures garnered through an active search in 1996: Teams
covering five regions of the U.S. contacted the specialists involved and
reviewed medical records for CJD cases between 1991 and 1995.
Comparing the actively garnered data with the death certificate infor-
mation showed that "we miss about 14 percent," said CDC epidemiolo-
gist Lawrence Schonberger. "That's improving. Doctors are becoming
more knowledgeable," thanks to increased scientific and media atten-
tion given to prion diseases.7

The active surveillance study of 1996, however, only looked at cases
in which physicians attributed the deaths to CJD. Misdiagnosed
patients or patients who never saw a neurologist were not tabulated
thus CJD may be grossly underreported. Many neurological ailments
share symptoms, especially early on. According to various studies,
autopsies have found that CJD is misdiagnosed as other ills, such as
dementia or Alzheimer's disease, 5 to 13 percent of the time. The CDC
finds that around 50,000 Americans die from Alzheimer's each year

228 CHAPTER 14

(about 4 million have the disease, according to the Alzheimer's
Association). Therefore, one could argue that thousands of CJD cases
are being missed. (On the flip side, CJD could be mistakenly diagnosed
as Alzheimer's disease or dementia, but the number of CJD patients is
so small that they wouldn't dramatically skew the statistics for other
neurological ills.)

In part to address the issue of misdiagnosis, CJD families have asked
the CDC to place the disease on the national list of officially notifiable
illnesses, which tends to include more contagious conditions such as
AIDS, tuberculosis, hepatitis, and viral forms of encephalitis.
Currently, only some states impose this requirement. CDC officials
have discounted the utility of such an approach, arguing that it would
duplicate the mortality data, which is more accurate than early diag-
noses of CJD, anyway. Moreover, mandatory reporting of CJD cases
does not necessarily guarantee the end to missed cases.8
One clue suggests that the passive system is undercounting CJD in
the U.S.: racial difference. The number of black CJD victims is about 38
percent that of white victims. Rather than sporadic CJD being a one-
in-a-million lottery, it's more like one-in-2.5-million for African-
Americans. Access to medical care might be one reason. Schonberger
recounted that the CDC had asked other countries with substantial
black populations to submit CJD figures for comparison but found that
the surveillance in those countries was inadequate. "We haven't been
able to find any comparable literature on this issue, so it's still up
in the
air," Schonberger said. On the other hand, Alzheimer's disease is more
common among black people than whites, with an estimated higher
prevalence ranging from 14 percent to almost 100 percent, according to
a February 2002 report by the Alzheimer's Association. Are some black
CJD cases being misdiagnosed as Alzheimer's?

Answering critics like Terry Singeltary, who feels that the U.S. under-
counts CJD, Schonberger conceded that the current surveillance system
has errors but stated that most of the errors will be confined to the older
population. As Schonberger pointed out, no doctor would misdiagnose a
30-year-old CJD patient as having Alzheimer's. The average age of the
first 100 variant CJD victims was 29; should the epidemiology of vCJD
changeif older people start coming down with itthen there would
be problems. "The adequacy of our overall CJD surveillance would be

Laying Odds 229
greatly reduced should the proportion of older individuals affected by
variant CJD substantially increase," Schonberger explained.9
To date, only brain autopsies can confirm CJD. To encourage the
necessary neuropathological studies, in 1997 the CDC helped establish
the National Prion Disease Pathology Surveillance Center at Case
Western Reserve University, under the directorship of Pierluigi
Gambetti. But the number of brains examined has fallen far short of
the number of CJD cases in the U.S.: Gambetti's lab, which receives
brains based on referrals from local physicians and families, looked at
only 99 sporadic CJD cases in 2000 and 138 in 2001, when about 300
each year are expected. "I'm very unhappy with the numbers,"
Gambetti lamented. "European countries see 100 or 90 percent of all
the cases suspected. We see 30 to 40 percent."10
Most families don't think about having an autopsy done (which can
cost upward of $1,500 if the hospitals don't pick up the tab), and mem-
bers of the support group CJD Voice have said they were too distraught
to think of shipping a loved one's brain by Federal Express to
Gambetti's lab. (For accurate analyses of brain tissue, the autopsy must
be performed within 72 hours of death, assuming the body has been
kept refrigerated.) Moreover, physicians often do not suggest an
autopsy, perhaps because of liability fears should the postmortem
reveal that the original diagnosis was wrong. Gambetti has been work-
ing on establishing a network that would enable postmortems to be
done near where the deceased person lived and without cost to
 
Laying Odds 229
greatly reduced should the proportion of older individuals affected by
variant CJD substantially increase," Schonberger explained.9
To date, only brain autopsies can confirm CJD. To encourage the
necessary neuropathological studies, in 1997 the CDC helped establish
the National Prion Disease Pathology Surveillance Center at Case
Western Reserve University, under the directorship of Pierluigi
Gambetti. But the number of brains examined has fallen far short of
the number of CJD cases in the U.S.: Gambetti's lab, which receives
brains based on referrals from local physicians and families, looked at
only 99 sporadic CJD cases in 2000 and 138 in 2001, when about 300
each year are expected. "I'm very unhappy with the numbers,"
Gambetti lamented. "European countries see 100 or 90 percent of all
the cases suspected. We see 30 to 40 percent."10
Most families don't think about having an autopsy done (which can
cost upward of $1,500 if the hospitals don't pick up the tab), and mem-
bers of the support group CJD Voice have said they were too distraught
to think of shipping a loved one's brain by Federal Express to
Gambetti's lab. (For accurate analyses of brain tissue, the autopsy must
be performed within 72 hours of death, assuming the body has been
kept refrigerated.) Moreover, physicians often do not suggest an
autopsy, perhaps because of liability fears should the postmortem
reveal that the original diagnosis was wrong. Gambetti has been work-
ing on establishing a network that would enable postmortems to be
done near where the deceased person lived and without cost to the
family. He is also working on advertising the existence of his surveil-
lance center, via meetings and letters to neurologists, pathologists, and
other specialists. Gambetti is also attempting to combat what he
termed "hysteria" over the potential for infection that has pathologists
irrationally shunning CJD cases while they willingly conduct arguably
riskier AIDS autopsies. "In order to make people aware, you have to
keep informing them over and over and over," he said.
Money is the main reason why the U.S. lags behind Europe in terms
of surveillance. To adequately survey the 290 U.S. million residents,
"you need a lot of money," Robert Will explained. "There was a CJD
meeting of families in America in which poor old Larry {Schonberger]
got attacked fairly vigorously because there wasn't proper surveillance.
You could only do proper surveillance if you have adequate resources.

230 CHAPTER 14
That's the bottom line. We're very fortunate in the U.K.; we have very
generous resources for CJD surveillance."

Moreover, the U.K. makes feline spongifbrm encephalopathy an offi-
cially notifiable disease. Domestic cats proved to be good sentinel ani-
mals because they dine on the meat not fit for human consumption
the parts more likely to harbor prion infectivity. In the U.S., FSE isn't
federally notifiable. And while the USDA says it has sent educational
material to private veterinarians and works with vet schools,21 it's not
clear just how many vets can spot FSE, which has never been reported
in the U.S. Certainly, not many cat postmortems are done.

The only active portion of the U.S. CJD surveillance system are the
follow-up investigations conducted for victims of CJD under 55 years of
age. It began in 1996, when young people in the U.K. started succumb-
ing to variant CJD. Victims under 30 years of age especially arouse
interest, because such cases could indicate an infection from the envi-
ronment. Except for the variant CJD case in Florida, the CDC has clas-
sified all of these more youthful cases of CJD as having either sporadic
or familial origins.

One such age cluster involved the three venison eaters that the CDC
tried unsuccessfully to link to the deer-and-elk borne chronic wasting
disease. A second grouping occurred in 2002 in a pair of Michigan men.
The twoone 26 years old, the other 28 did not know each other but
lived in neighboring counties in Michigan and went to the same hospi-
tal for diagnosis.12 The CDC's investigation turned up nothing that
suggested a new form of CJD had emerged.

But the increased frequency of young CJD cases is disturbing. In the
18-year period between 1979 and 1996, the U.S. had 12 cases in patients
under 30, and only one of them had the sporadic form of CJD. (The
other cases resulted from heredity or from transmission via contami-
nated growth hormone or dura mater grafts.13) Between 1997 and 2001,
five people under 30 died of sporadic CJD: the three venison eaters and
the two Michigan patients. That represents a substantial blip of five
young cases in five years, as opposed to only one case in 18 years.
Physicians at the University of Michigan Health System who examined
the two Michigan men concluded:
As a result of our findings, we feel that sporadic CJD may be more
common than previously thought, that it may occur in younger indi-

Laying Odds 231

viduals than currently perceived, and that some cases may go undiag-
nosed due to insufficient testing. . . . We recommend that physicians
everywhere begin to consider CJD in rapidly progressive neurological
decline of unknown causes in people under 30 years of age, and that
brain biopsy and autopsy with genetic and prion analysis be performed
in all such cases.14

Pathologically, the recent bout of young casualties in the U.S. appears
to be no different from CJD already seen in America. Yet theoretically
it may have come from a new source of infection, based on an unex-
pected result announced in late November 2002. John Collinge of the
British Medical Research Council's Prion Unit found that not all trans-
genic mice infected with BSE prions developed the neuropathological
and molecular characteristics of variant CJD; some of the mice instead
generated the molecular features of sporadic CJD. Therefore, some
CJD cases classified as sporadic may have actually been caused by BSE
prions, Collinge hypothesized.15 So far, the epidemiology of CJD in the
U.K. does not bear out that suppositionthere has been no substantial
uptick in sporadic CJD as would be expected if BSE could paint more
than one pathological picture. But the preliminary study, taken at face
value, could be seen as evidence that something infectious is happening
in the cases of young, sporadic CJD victims in the U.S.

Another mouse study, reported in March 2002, fueled concern that
prion infections may be more common than previously thought.16
Stanley Prusiner's lab found that mice infected with mouse prions accu-
mulated PrPSc in their skeletal muscles, mostly in those in the hind
limbs. In some mice, each gram of muscle contained some 10 million
infectious doseson par with that in the brain in other experiments
involving intracerebral inoculation. To some CJD researchers, this find-
ing suggested that muscle meat from cows might not be safe, after all,
and that the measures taken in Europe to protect the food supply
banning high-risk cow partsmay not be enough.

Although this study may seem alarming, its implications are not as
sweeping as they may appear. Only a minority of results in mouse stud-
ies end up having a direct analog in humans. The skeletal muscle discov-
ery warrants further examination, but it would be premature to alter
food policies. Prions are different for each species, and accumulation of
prions varies from species to species and from disease to disease.
Furthermore, BSE cattle muscle has failed to sicken mice in bioassay

232 CHAPTER 14

work, suggesting that little or no infectious prions lurk there. What
such findings truly reveal is that prion diseases are complicated and still
mysterious, and trying to quantify the risks for human health is fraught
with uncertainties...snip...284 pages...thanks Philip...TSS

The Pathological Protein: Mad Cow, Chronic Wasting, and Other Deadly
Prion Diseases, Philip Yam

Philip Yam
News Editor
Scientific American


http://www.sciam.com
 
DR. CLIFFORD: "Basically the IHC test, besides looking at location of the brain stem you're also doing a staining technique to identify abnormal prion proteins. In this case they had some staining, but the staining did not match up with what they would typically see in a BSE case. It didn't have the normal distribution it would see within the samples. So basically that's why the request for doing additional testing, and that's why we're sending it to Weybridge as well."

DR. CLIFFORD: "There was some staining present. But it did not match a normal pattern, and we're taking through that to do additional tests in additional parts of the brain stem to try to see if we can find a normal staining pattern as well as sending that sample to Weybridge to run against their IHC."

http://www.usda.gov/wps/portal/usdahome ... 7/0280.xml


IN CONFIDENCE

PERCEPTION OF UNCONVENTENTIONAL SLOW VIRUS DISEASES OF ANIMALS IN THE USA

1985 The Stetsonville outbreak (farmer's name: Brecke). In addition to the downer cows and horses Brecke's mink recieved a cereal supplement. Hartsough's view was that this would contain bone meal and would be from a commercial source. If this were so and it was contaminated with a TME agent why were no other ranches affected?

Many mink ranches now feed a commerical pelleted diet. Brecke was equipped to process LARGE CARCASSES USING A CRUSHER/MIXER WHICH COULD ACCOMMODATE A WHOLE COW!

snip...

Dead mink go for rendering but are used only in poultry feed.


A commercial mink ranch was visited. This was Johny Werth's, Capitol Fur Farm comprising 1400 breeding females. The feed is bought in from a commercial supplier in the form of frozen packs of ''poultry'', ''fish'', ''dried egg'' or ''tripe''. A commercial mink cereal supplement is used and contains ''animal meat meal'' which was said to contain material mainly from poultry or fish origin but OCCASIONALLY FROM BEEF SOURCES. the partially thawed packs were tipped into an augur mixer which has a fully loaded capacity of 6000lb and this would be approximately 15000 mink per day.

In the fall at pelting time the skinned carcasses of the mink are placed in large barrels which are left in the open to freeze. When full, a renderer collects ''for use in poultry feeds''.

Sections from the brains of the two Brecke TME inoculated cattle were examined and Marsh provided all the blocks from the 2nd steer for study at CVL and comparison with BSE. In general the vacuolar changes were more severe than in most cases of BSE but very similar in distribution. Unfortunately material aken fro histopathology from those anials omitted representaion of most of the brain stem. ...........

Wilbur Clarke (reference the Mission, Texas scrapie transmission transmission to cattle study) is now the State Veterinarian for Montana based at Helena.

I was given confidential access to sections from the Clarke scrapie-cattle transmission experiment. Details of the experimental design were as supplied previously by Dr. Wrathall (copy of relevant information appended). Only 3 animals (2 inoculated with 2nd pass Suffolk scrapie and 1 inoculated with Angora goat passaged scrapie) showed clinical signs. Clinical signs were characterised by weakness, ''a stilted hindlimb gait'', disorientation, ataxia and, terminally, lateral recumbency. The two cattle from which I examined material were inocluated at 8 months of age and developed signs 36 months pi (goat scrapie inoculum) and 49 months pi (one of the Suffolk scrapie inoculated) respectively. This latter animal was killed at 58 months of age and so the clinical duration was only 1 month. The neuropathology was somewhat different from BSE or the Stetsonville TME in cattle. Vacuolar changes were minimal, to the extent that detection REQUIRED CAREFUL SEARCHING. Conversely astrocyte hypertrophy was a widespread and prominent feature. The material requires DETAILED NEUROPATHOLOGICAL ASSESSMENT BUT WHETHER OR NOT THIS WILL BE DONE REMAINS A QUESTION.

Transmission Studies

Mule deer transmissions of CWD were by intracerebral inoculation and compared with natural cases

{the following was written but with a single line marked through it ''first passage (by this route)}...TSS

resulted in a more rapidly progressive clinical disease with repeated episodes of synocopy ending in coma. One control animal became affected, it is believed through contamination of inoculum (?saline). Further CWD transmissions were carried out by Dick Marsh into ferret, mink and squirrel monkey. Transmission occurred in ALL of these species with the shortest
incubation period in the ferret.

snip...

Appendix 3

VISIT TO USA - DR A E WRATHALL - INFO OH BSE AND SCRAPIE

1. Dr Clark lately of the Scrapie Research Unit, Mission Texas has
successfully transmitted ovine and caprine scrapie to cattle. The
experimental results have not been published but there are plans to do
this. This work was initiated in 1978. A summary of it is:-

Expt A
6 Her x Jer calves born in 1978 were inoculated as follows with
a 2nd Suffolk scrapie passage:-


i/c 1ml; i/m, 5ml; s/c 5ml; oral 30ml.
1/6 went down after 48 months with a scrapie/BSE-like disease.

Expt B
6 Her or Jer or HxJ calves were inoculated with angora Goat
virus 2/6 went down similarly after 36 months.

Expt C
Mice inoculated from brains of calves/cattle in expts A • B
were resistant, only 1/20 going down with scrapie and this was the
reason given for not publishing.

Diagnosis in A, B, C was by histopath. No reports on SAT were given.

2. Dr Warren Foote indicated success so far in eliminating scrapie in
offspring from experimentally- (and naturally) infected sheep by ET.
He had found difficulty in obtaining embryos from naturally infected
sheep (cf SPA).

3. Prof. A Robertson gave a brief account of BSE. The US approach was to
accord it a very low profile indeed. Dr A Thiermann showed the
picture in the "Independent" with cattle being incinerated and thought
this was a fanatical incident to be avoided in the US at all costs.
BSE was not reported in USA.


4. Scrapie incidents (ie affected flocks) have shown a dramatic increase
since 1978. In 1953 when the National Control Scheme was started
there were 10-14 incidents, in 1978 - 1 and in 1988 so far 60.

5. Scrapie agent was reported to have been isolated from a solitary
fetus.

6. A western blotting diagnostic technique (? on PrP) shows some promise.

7. Results of a questionnaire sent to 33 states on the subject of the
national sheep scrapie programme survey indicated


17/33 wished to drop it

6/33 wished to develop it

8/33 had few sheep and were neutral


Information obtained from Dr Wrathall's notes of a meeting of the U.S.
Animal Health Association at Little Rock, Arkansas Nov. 1988.


33

end...TSS


>> Differences in tissue distribution could require new regulations
>> regarding specific risk material (SRM) removal.


snip...end

full text 33 PAGES ;


http://www.bseinquiry.gov.uk/files/mb/m11b/tab01.pdf

http://www.bseinquiry.gov.uk/files/yb/1 ... 001001.pdf

It was, however, performed in the USA in 1979, when it was shown that cattle inoculated with the scrapie agent endemic in the flock of Suffolk sheep at the United States Department of Agriculture in Mission, Texas, developed a TSE quite unlike BSE. 32 The findings of the initial transmission, though not of the clinical or neurohistological examination, were communicated in October 1988 to Dr Watson, Director of the CVL, following a visit by Dr Wrathall, one of the project leaders in the Pathology Department of the CVL, to the United States Department of Agriculture. 33 The results were not published at this point, since the attempted transmission to mice from the experimental cow brain had been inconclusive. The results of the clinical and histological differences between scrapie-affected sheep and cattle were published in 1995. Similar studies in which cattle were inoculated intracerebrally with scrapie inocula derived from a number of scrapie-affected sheep of different breeds and from different States, were carried out at the US National Animal Disease Centre. 34 The results, published in 1994, showed that this source of scrapie agent, though pathogenic for cattle, did not produce the same clinical signs of brain lesions characteristic of BSE.

http://www.bseinquiry.gov.uk/



1: J Infect Dis. 1994 Apr;169(4):814-20.


Intracerebral transmission of scrapie to cattle.

Cutlip RC, Miller JM, Race RE, Jenny AL, Katz JB, Lehmkuhl HD, DeBey BM, Robinson MM.

USDA, Agriculture Research Service, National Animal Disease Center, Ames, IA 50010.

To determine if sheep scrapie agent(s) in the United States would induce a disease in cattle resembling bovine spongiform encephalopathy, 18 newborn calves were inoculated intracerebrally with a pooled suspension of brain from 9 sheep with scrapie. Half of the calves were euthanatized 1 year after inoculation. All calves kept longer than 1 year became severely lethargic and demonstrated clinical signs of motor neuron dysfunction that were manifest as progressive stiffness, posterior paresis, general weakness, and permanent recumbency. The incubation period was 14-18 months, and the clinical course was 1-5 months. The brain from each calf was examined for lesions and for protease-resistant prion protein. Lesions were subtle, but a disease-specific isoform of the prion protein was present in the brain of all calves. Neither signs nor lesions were characteristic of those for bovine spongiform encephalopathy.

MeSH Terms:
Animals
Brain/microbiology*
Brain/pathology
Cattle
Cattle Diseases/etiology*
Cattle Diseases/pathology
Encephalopathy, Bovine Spongiform/etiology*
Encephalopathy, Bovine Spongiform/pathology
Immunoblotting/veterinary
Immunohistochemistry
Male
Motor Neurons/physiology
Prions/analysis
Scrapie/pathology
Scrapie/transmission*
Sheep
Sleep Stages
Time Factors

Substances:
Prions

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/quer ... t=Citation

Intracerebral transmission of scrapie to cattle FULL TEXT PDF;

SNIP...

Discussion

WE conclude that American sources of sheep scrapie are transmissible to cattle by direct intracerebral inoculation but the disease induced is NOT identical to BSE as seen in the United Kingdom. While there were similarities in clinical signs between this experimental disease and BSE, there was no evidence of aggressiveness, hyperexcitability, hyperesthesia (tactile or auditory), or hyperemetria of limbs as has been reported for BSE (9). Neither were there extensive neurologic lesions, which are primary for BSE, such as severe vacuolation of neurons and neuropil or neuronal necrosis and gliosis. Although some vacuolation of neuropil, chromotolysis in neurons, and gliosis were seen in the brains of some affected calves, these were industinguishable from those of controls. Vacuolated neurons in the red nucleus of both challenged and normal calves were considered normal for the bovines as previously described (50).

PrP-res was found in ALL CHALLENGED CALVES REGARDLESS OF CLINCIAL SIGNS, and the amount of PrP-res positively related to the length of the incubation. ...

snip...

WE also conclude from these studies that scrapie in cattle MIGHT NOT BE RECOGNIZED BY ROUTINE HISTOPATHOLOGICAL EXAMINATION OF THE BRAIN AND SUGGEST THAT DETECTION OF PrP-res by immunohistochemistry or immunoblotting is necessary to make a definitive diagnosis. THUS, undiagnosed scrapie infection could contribute to the ''DOWNER-COW'' syndrome and could be responsible for some outbreaks of transmissible mink encephalopathy proposed by Burger and Hartsough (8) and Marsh and harsough (52). ...

snip...

Multiple sources of sheep affected with scrapie and two breeds of cattle from several sources were used inthe current study in an effort to avoid a single strain of either agent or host. Preliminary results from mouse inoculations indicate multiple strains of the agent were present in the pooled inoculum (unpublished data). ...

Transmission of the sheep scrapie to cattle was attempted in 1979 by using intracerebral, intramuscular, subcutaneous, and oral routes of inoculation of 5, 8- to 11-month old cattlw with a homologous mixture of brain from 1 affected sheep (61, 62). ONE of the 5 cattle develped neurologic signs 48 months after inoculation. Signs were disorientation, incoordination, a stiff-legged stilted gait, progressive difficulty in rising, and finally in terminal recumbency. The clinical course was 2.5 months. TWO of the 5 cattle similarly inoculated with brain tissue from a goat with scrapie exhibited similar signs 27 and 36 months after incoluation. Clinical courses were 43 an 44 days. Brain lesions of mild gliosis and vacuolation and mouse inoculation data were insufficient to confirm a diagnosis of scrapie. This work remained controversial until recent examination of the brains detected PrP-res in all 3 cattle with neurologic disease but in none of the unaffected cattle (62). Results of these studies are similar to ours and underscore the necessity of methods other than histopathology to diagnose scrapie infection in cattle. We believe that immunologic techniques for detecting PrP-res currently provide the most sensitive and reliable way to make a definitive diagnosis...

http://www.bseinquiry.gov.uk/files/sc/seac17/tab03.pdf

Visit to USA ... info on BSE and Scrapie

http://www.bseinquiry.gov.uk/files/yb/1 ... 001001.pdf


http://www.ngpc.state.ne.us/cgi-bin/ult ... 2;t=000385

12/10/76
AGRICULTURAL RESEARCH COUNCIL
REPORT OF THE ADVISORY COMMITTE ON SCRAPIE
Office Note
CHAIRMAN: PROFESSOR PETER WILDY

snip...

A The Present Position with respect to Scrapie
A] The Problem

Scrapie is a natural disease of sheep and goats. It is a slow
and inexorably progressive degenerative disorder of the nervous system
and it ia fatal. It is enzootic in the United Kingdom but not in all
countries.

The field problem has been reviewed by a MAFF working group
(ARC 35/77). It is difficult to assess the incidence in Britain for
a variety of reasons but the disease causes serious financial loss;
it is estimated that it cost Swaledale breeders alone $l.7 M during
the five years 1971-1975. A further inestimable loss arises from the
closure of certain export markets, in particular those of the United
States, to British sheep.

It is clear that scrapie in sheep is important commercially and
for that reason alone effective measures to control it should be
devised as quickly as possible.

Recently the question has again been brought up as to whether
scrapie is transmissible to man. This has followed reports that the
disease has been transmitted to primates. One particularly lurid
speculation (Gajdusek 1977) conjectures that the agents of scrapie,
kuru, Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease and transmissible encephalopathy of
mink are varieties of a single "virus". The U.S. Department of
Agriculture concluded that it could "no longer justify or permit
scrapie-blood line and scrapie-exposed sheep and goats to be processed
for human or animal food at slaughter or rendering plants" (ARC 84/77)"
The problem is emphasised by the finding that some strains of scrapie
produce lesions identical to the once which characterise the human
dementias"

Whether true or not. the hypothesis that these agents might be
transmissible to man raises two considerations. First, the safety
of laboratory personnel requires prompt attention. Second, action
such as the "scorched meat" policy of USDA makes the solution of the
acrapie problem urgent if the sheep industry is not to suffer
grievously.

snip...

76/10.12/4.6

http://www.bseinquiry.gov.uk/files/yb/1 ... 004001.pdf


THE infamous USA SPORADIC CJDs, something to ponder;

IF the USA TSE in cattle does not look like UK BSE, why would the USA human TSE look like UK nvCJD???

PLUS, WHY WOULD THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT BAN SCIENTIFIC RESEARCH ON BSE IN THE USA TO ALL SCIENTIST, EXCEPT ONLY ONES WITH WRITTEN PERMISSION, but let all other TSEs be researched??? kinda makes one wonder :roll:
 
O.K. since the powers that be are lying to us about everything what do you suggest we do?
 
srr wrote;

O.K. since the powers that be are lying to us about everything what do you suggest we do?...........


srr, that's a good question. if as much time was spent on just doing what science told us long ago, we would be so much further ahead, but then you had GW and his BSE MRR policy come into play, and this set every attempt to eradicate this agent back to the stone age of BSE, i.e. about 25+ years. it's all backwards from here. YOU and every other cattleman must take a stand against those 'powers that be', that got you into this mess, and continue to bury you deeper and deeper into this nightmare through nothing more than sheer ignorance and greed. we must take the politics out of the science. we must get the industry out of the usda decision making policy, and put it back in the hands of competent TSE scientists, not so called scientist the industry uses to try and discredit any scientific report that would hurt them financially, this is the junk science the USDA has been using for the past 6 or so years. its really very simple, but somebody must take a stand based on science, and that is beyond anything the USDA has done for some time. ...TSS
 
Flounder, I might agree with you and I might not.. Truth is, I don't know.. It's not because I'm unsure of your sources or research, it's because.....

I DON'T HAVE TIME TO READ 20 PAGES OF CUT AND PASTE SNIPPETS.

I've said it before, and I'll say it again.. Make a statement, and when someone calls you on your statement, back it up with a few facts -- not 10 pages of dry ass drivel, mind you -- just enough to get your point across.

I'm not telling you this because I want to see you succeed in convincing everyone to agree with your position (whatever the hell they may be), I'm telling you this because it's really, really fricken annoying to have to scroll for three days to find AN ORIGINAL THOUGHT.
 
cmjust0 wrote;

Flounder, I might agree with you and I might not.. Truth is, I don't know.. It's not because I'm unsure of your sources or research, it's because.....

I DON'T HAVE TIME TO READ 20 PAGES OF CUT AND PASTE SNIPPETS. .......

then don't. i am not forcing you to read this. others do have time, and others are interested in where my statements/thoughts/theories etc come from, talk is just, talk, unless you can back it up. these studies are very important to some ranchers that are following it, and some have wrote to me and told me. they file them away. everyone is not trying to bury this topic or me. some are. i simply posted the data in this thread because some had mentioned that some were not aware of all the strains in humans and animals, and the new science that is coming about as far as the diagnostic criterias etc. it's complicated, but some still want the science, not just me sitting here spouting off. if the science is over your head, just don't read it. but it is important, and i did cut the studies as to just snips and then urls for folks that want them. ...tss


cmjust0 wrote;


I've said it before, and I'll say it again.. Make a statement, and when someone calls you on your statement, back it up with a few facts --


not 10 pages of dry ass drivel, mind you -- just enough to get your point across. ...



thats what i did i thought, sorry things got complicated for you. i just brought forth some studies that others thought interesting, and that was the short version. i have yet to hear directly from a moderator on this problem, only a few of you seem to be having with my post. ...tss


cmjust0 wrote;


I'm not telling you this because I want to see you succeed in convincing everyone to agree with your position (whatever the be nice they may be), ,,,,,,,,,


heaven forbid we educate a few folks here, that's not what everybody wants apparently.
i dont want to just _convince_ people with mere chit-chat, i want them to learn the science.
and you would be surprised at some that do actually want to do just that, not the junk science usda et al have put out over the years, but the rest of it, all of it, the 'sound science'. ...tss


cmjust0 wrote;

I'm telling you this because it's really, really fricken annoying to have to scroll for three days to find AN ORIGINAL THOUGHT.


i dont think you had to skroll for three days, that was a short one that was snipped, i think it was more you did not like what you read, so you wanted folks to jump on the delete TSS bandwagon again, so the science would be removed from public viewing on this forum again. ...


kind regards,
terry
 
Believe me, man, it wasn't that I didn't like what I read -- I didn't read it. It's not that I can't read it, either, but that I realized it was 938 pages long and said to hell with it..

That's what most people are doing, I can assure you.

And, BTW, if you're about posting facts and science versus having discussions, why come to a *discussion* forum to do that?? Wouldn't it be easier to create a web page and post your articles there ONCE, versus posting the same stuff 10 or 12 times here??

It sure would make my life easier if you would choose a central location from which to be ignored... :lol:
 
cmjust0 wrote;


And, BTW, if you're about posting facts and science versus having discussions, why come to a *discussion* forum to do that?? Wouldn't it be easier to create a web page and post your articles there ONCE, versus posting the same stuff 10 or 12 times here??


because the producers have been discussing it for years and still cannot get it right, so i thought i would come to the source of what we consume. ...tss


cmjust0 wrote;

It sure would make my life easier if you would choose a central location from which to be ignored...


you just proved my point, and why the USA has absolutely no idea of the true incidence of BSE?TSE in the USA in any species. ...tss

:(
 
this guy has way too much tijme on his hands making posts that are not only reduntant and self serving, but lacking real solid information! rea one you have basically read them all and who wants to read one to start with!
i agree MAKE A WEBSITE make life better for all of us that have concerns but do not wish to read page after page of garbage to discover there is nothing relevant being said!

BORING
 
cmjust0":2djckso3 said:
Believe me, man, it wasn't that I didn't like what I read -- I didn't read it. It's not that I can't read it, either, but that I realized it was 938 pages long and said to be nice with it..

That's what most people are doing, I can assure you.

Same here. I still don't understand what he's trying to say. Here's a challenge: On a new post, make your point in 100 words or less.
 

Latest posts

Top