Because when MikeC was talking about how AU had changed things with their test, it was NOT OK with you since it hadn't been "published". It had been reviewed eight ways from Sunday with producer and academic involvement, just not "published" where you could read it. 40 years of testing bulls didn't teach them enough about how to look at them, but your experience over a couple years did?
Now, we see you using your opinion, and your eyeball, this time it is "stress", not "health" on an 84 day test, with no producer or academic input, but it's OK?
:stop:
Badlands
