Jake":x7ud1pue said:
alexfarms":x7ud1pue said:
It's called common sense and yes, I do read others posts before I respond. A CEO doesn't fire 15 employees and then complain about having created "challenging times". Cow numbers are down across the country. AHA raised its fees last fall, they'll probably do it again. Most CEOs are overpaid and most of the low men on the totum pole are underpaid.
Go read about what actually happened and the reasons it was carried out instead of applying your "common sense" I don't read the statement issues as complaining it is informing of membership of a change in who is going to be dealing with them on a daily basis and to expect some challenges as they replace the staff. You're are trying to talk about something that has no place in the discussion of these events.
As a business owner and former longtime corporate ladder climber within a fine, HUGE corporation, I can safely say there are a LOT of reasons other than money these employees could have been fired. Yes, it could have been money, or it could have been an uprising within the ranks, or it could have been about technology, or it could have been about performance, or it could have been a new direction the CEO wanted to take the corporation. It could have any and/or all of the above. Too many possibilities for a peon like me to know about and discuss with any authority, for sure. It's sad when anyone loses their job. I'm a small Simmy and commercial guy, but I see the AAA letter as a customer service tool to inform current and prospective members of a change in the company structure. As far as tough times, I don't see those comments as having to do with anything other than the direct challenge of rebuilding key positions within the business. If we're not living in difficult times in our country, then we're not living...
David