Search results for query: *

Several years later, some of those mommas would have been culled. The gene pool of the older cows "should" be better genetics.

"Many of you say you have XXX years experience, but do you really? Maybe it was the same year repeated XXX times. Be honest, except for trying a different bull of a new fly spray or some such thing, was this year much different than last year or the year before that?" This question/statement...

The cow needs the best feed when she is nursing a calf - not before. The calves SHOULD be standing in good grass while they nurse. As for your last sentence - it shows lack of experience and lack of exposure to diverse operations.

You don't have to pay taxes on the calf, but neither can you depreciate out the calf on your taxes like you can with a purchased heifer.

This and all your other posts about genetic engineering show how little you know. Its not "transgenic engineering", it is genetic engineering. Transgenic organisms are the product of genetic engineering. You struggle so hard to make people think you are correct even when it's obvious how...

Your question illustrates your ignorance.

"Corn flour, wheat flour. The concept is the same. LC has provided a service by reporting on a recall of meat. Why the animosity?" Do you understand the animosity now?

Why doesn't he just let the government take care of it like you suggested. "Example: If the calf feed you buy says 16% protein and it only test as 10% protein, that is fraud. So do you want to waste $1,000s to recoup your loss, or let the government handle it and prove your case for you."

When you post half-truths, lies, contradictions, and opinions stated as facts - on a consistant basis - you are going to receive some animosity.

I plead guilty to feeding the troll. I don't know why I thought I could interject some reasonable logic. I regret the futility of trying to show some logic and reason to an obviously moronic shill. I cry your pardon.

ricebeltrancher, I hope you didn't think this post of mine was directed at you. It was directed at LCCattle. Your posts, on the other hand, are well thought out, understandable, and sane.

"Since when is it ludicrous for anyone to state there opinion or that of others? If others, including yourself, have the right to state your opinions, why are you objecting to me doing the same? " You are putting out some crazy made up or unverified ideas as facst - not as opinion. Here is...

Still the best post on this thread.

Black Canyons video tells you they are angus. No need to draw on your vast knowledge of cattle phenotypes. So, it looks like you are finally doing some research on the beef you bought with the Black Canyon label. Pretty easy to find the info on the USDA grade, wasn't it. See the post...

Muddy, I really think that he thinks when he posts something that comes from his mind or who knows where (no matter how ignorant), it has now been proven. He will probably post a link, but it will have nothing to do with the subject at hand. Or he will just throw out some other red herring.

It's hard to argue with a person of this intellect, isn't it. Good try, but the word futility comes to mind.

It's not my story. It's the simple truth of how grading works. I was just pointing out how little you know about grading.

I thought it looked pretty typical for those cuts. The carcass it came from was either select or choice. I guess I really don't know what a round steak from a prime carcass looks like.

Good post. Sounds like a good day. Thanks for putting this thread in perspective.

According to you, all domesticated food is GMO. That should make it easy to label.