Young bull critique

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases. Product prices and availability are accurate as of the date/time indicated and are subject to change.
can't say anything bad from the pic. he does have a nice "herd bull" look to him for being 14 months.
 
Have a question for all of you. When looking for the positive/negative in bulls, cows, calves(heifers or bulls) can you accurately
say that they are a good representation of that breed without knowing what breed they are? I understand looking for conformational
negative/positives, I realize that your first thought is "what, can't tell what breed they are" ? Should a Charolais look like a white angus?
I realize there can be a huge variation within a breed, which seems odd. Simmental's are black ? Should a Simmental be built like an
angus? The Maine-Anjou cattle (Durham x Mancelle) were a red/light red with white, no black genetics there, but after arriving in the US,
they suddenly became black ? So will the breeds eventually all look similar, or will some breeders retain the original standard for that breed ?
Perhaps the first Charolais I saw was not a good representation of the breed.

Back to the 14 month old bull, no matter what the breed, he is a fairly nice looking animal. Not sure about front legs/feet. But could be
angle of picture/soft ground
 
Need to see him walk to make any opinions beyond this pic. If his natural stance has his back legs that close together, I would assume his rear muscling isn't balanced. Just a thought.
 
There isn't enough in the picture to make a case one way or the other. I would definitely want to see him out of the pen where he could walk to check out his overall structure more thoughly especially his feet amd legs.
 

Latest posts

Back
Top