USDA Opens CRP to Haying

Oldtimer

Well-known member
Joined
Jan 19, 2004
Messages
3,922
City & State/Province
Northeast Montana
This may help the high costs of hay in some areas...I'm not sure yet what all areas of the country this will be...

Sometimes (especially in the drought years) by the time they let you hay it, its a little dried out and course--but still makes a turd...Lots of cows have been wintered on CRP hay in years past when they let it be cut.....


USDA opens 24 million acres to livestock feed use

By Janie Gabbett on 5/28/2008 for Meatingplace.com


USDA announced it has authorized 24 million acres currently under the Conservation Reserve Program (CRP) to be available for hay and forage to feed livestock this summer to help producers cope with high feed prices and possible grain shortages.

Agriculture Secretary Ed Schafer estimated this program will make up to 18 million tons of forage, worth $1.2 billion, available.

Quick to address environmental concerns, Schafer said eligible land may not be hayed or grazed until after the end of the primary wildlife nesting season, which varies across the country but generally ends in late July or early August. All forage use must be completed by Nov. 10.

He also said about 25 percent of the eligible land or forage from that land must be reserved for wildlife. In addition, any land that is used under this authority must have a conservation plan. Finally, the most environmentally sensitive land enrolled in the CRP — such as wetlands — will not be eligible.

Prices for most field crops have advanced to record or near record levels in recent months, reflecting strong demand, tight supplies and competition for acres. The higher prices have impacted the livestock industry in particular, Schafer noted.

Farmers and ranchers with CRP acreage can begin sign-up for the program June 2. They will be charged $75 for processing but will not be assessed any rental payment reduction for haying or grazing the land.

The program does not, however, allow growers an early out from their CRP contracts to grow grain on that land. Schafer repeated on a conference call with reporters that growers are not allowed to take acres out of the CRP before their existing contracts expire without penalty during the 2008 crop year. CRP contracts are typically 10 to 15 years long.
 
In places where there is a lot of CRP, like Eastern MT and the Dakotas. Will be a huge help on the hay supply. Minnesota will benefit, good bit of CRP in the Northwest part of the state.
 
I think they opened it everywhere except for places that can't be baled like wetlands. They opened them in iowa and if you own it you have to get permission or go to your local office or call or something to ok it or filll out something but then you are free to bale it. Thats the way i understood it.
 
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases. Product prices and availability are accurate as of the date/time indicated and are subject to change.
ga. prime":371l0aav said:
Betcha they won't make the rental payment if you cut hay off CRP land.
Opening of the crp for critical use will not effect the rental payments in any fashion, A $75 dollar fee will be charged for contract modification. Signup begins June 2 harvesting of hay can begin after nesting season in your area ends. It actually is a very good deal for farmers and ranchers but not maybe the best for the hunters.
 
I agree it is a good idea. I just would have thought more of Mr. Schafer had he left the part about wetlands out. I guess he had to be politically correct. I don't know what ya'lls wetlands look like but only a drunken imbicile who wanted to trash his equipment would even consider cutting hay in our wetlands. Besides, I think it would be awefully hard to bale cypress and gum trees.
 
Jo here in Minnesota we have declared wetlands that are row cropped every year. Put that same parcel into crp and then you have a entirely new set of rules to follow. I've never understood how seeding something to grass makes it anymore of a wetland than when row crops were planted there but it does. Water never stands there during either crop and it is never wetter than any other part of the farm but long ago it was declared a wetland but some well meaning fool so now a person has to follow stupid rules set forth by more well meaning fools.
 
somn":h4uqblfm said:
Jo here in Minnesota we have declared wetlands that are row cropped every year. Put that same parcel into crp and then you have a entirely new set of rules to follow. I've never understood how seeding something to grass makes it anymore of a wetland than when row crops were planted there but it does. Water never stands there during either crop and it is never wetter than any other part of the farm but long ago it was declared a wetland but some well meaning fool so now a person has to follow stupid rules set forth by more well meaning fools.

That's a good explanation and I know exactly what you mean. Here we have what are called indicator species which can be used to identify wetlands. Our federal soil folks are good people and have common sense and what they call wetlands is, for the most part, wet land that is not good for anything other than holding the world together. What worries me is the list of indicator species and the age of some of the federal soil conservationists. When these older guys retire, I'm afraid they might be replaced by some environmentally brain-washed overzealous half-wit who blindly uses this as his guide. If so, I live in a wetland even though my house is on a hill. Go figure. :idea:
 

Latest posts

Back
Top