colleen
Well-known member
Why didn't I think of that Dun!! Helps make things easier.
Gee they missed listing calving on steep hills as being a cause!colleen":121w62c9 said:Just a little info from Merck on Uterine prolapses. (Of which I know nothing about)
"Uterine Prolapses"
A uterine prolapse is typically seen immediately following or within a few hours of calving. Compared to the vaginal prolapse, the uterine prolapse is larger, longer (usually hanging down to the hocks when standing), more deep red in color and covered with the "buttons" where the placenta was attached. A uterine prolapse is considered a medical emergency; therefore, this condition is life threatening. If the affected cow is not treated quickly, she could go into shock or die from blood loss. Contact your veterinarian for assistance with this procedure. If the uterus is pushed back improperly, it could result in internal bleeding and death of the cow.
With uterine prolapses, if a good, clean job is done replacing the uterus, it may not be necessary to cull the cow from the herd. These cows have the potential to return to the herd and maintain a normal reproductive existence. However, if an infection occurred when the uterus was replaced, the cow may be slow to rebreed or may not breed back at all. Although there is no genetic predisposition to uterine prolapses, be aware that cows that have experienced a prolapsed uterus have a higher risk of prolapsing again compared to cows that have never experienced this condition.
Potential factors that can predispose a cow to a uterine prolapse include a difficult calving (dystocia) that causes injury or irritation of the external birth canal, severe straining during labor or excessive pressure applied when pulling a calf. Other factors may include nutrition-related problems such as low blood calcium levels (more common in dairy cows) or overly thin cows that calve in poor body condition. To avoid problems with uterine prolapses, try to decrease the potential for the cow being affected by a predisposing factor listed above.
The Merck Veterinary Manual 9th Edition. Merck and Co., Inc., Rahway, New Jersey 07065. http://www.merckvetmanual.com/
dun":1adj1zam said:We will put them in the chute to get a halter on her, then tie it to the ouside of the chute and have her walk out. Then we start the pulling or wahtever is needed.colleen":1adj1zam said:We have lost one calf out of 5 for February. It's never easy. Especially not for Mom! Maybe the rest of the season will be better for you. Isn't it risky to put a cow in a chute to pull a calf? You should tie them using a halter, never a rope around the neck. And I've always heard never put into a chute, in case they lay or fall down. Isn't that right?
Colleen
No, just somewhere around the chute that akllows a lot of working room. The chute is about the easiest thing to tie her to that isn;t going to move if she goes nuts.inyati13":1d0j8ji6 said:dun, follow-up question. Where does the cow stand in relationship to the chute or do you move her to a location away for the chute to do the pulling?
That's the reson we turn them out and tie them off to the chute. They can go down but it isn;t any kind of emergency or worry type of deal.Fire Sweep Ranch":16nrfoq9 said:My only concern would be a cow laying down and choking...
Good to know. My vet gave me the impression that you do the work in the chute but I see now he may have meant we would use the chute for the prep work.dun":l6uzp2bw said:If uou've ever tried using a calf jack on a cowin a chute you would see the wisdom in having her out of the chute.
Ifthe cow is a real lunatic we'll put the chains on the calf in the chute also then turn her out to actaully pull it
That's a perfect reason to always do pelvic measurements on heifers before breeding.robertwhite":3ox6f7fr said:The other cows didn't have a problem delivering their long legged calves, so maybe it was a combination of the cow having smaller hips
dun":1f67ma6s said:That's a perfect reason to always do pelvic measurements on heifers before breeding.robertwhite":1f67ma6s said:The other cows didn't have a problem delivering their long legged calves, so maybe it was a combination of the cow having smaller hips
You can really significantly decrease calving issues by doing the pelvic on all heifers. It's not fool proof but it helps.This year we are culling a retained heifer because she failed her pelvic measurement, her mother had a large measurement as a heifer and this one is so small she wouldn;t be able to pass anything much bigger then a puppy. It is heritable but every once in a while you get one of those throwback/anomaly kind of deals. Some friends did pelvics on a bunch of heifers all sired by one particualr bull. They all had way more then minimum size, when they started calving they had to do Csections on most of them. The pelvic as 2 year olds was only a hair larger then it had been as yearlings. That's the anomalyrobertwhite":3cdnroew said:dun":3cdnroew said:That's a perfect reason to always do pelvic measurements on heifers before breeding.robertwhite":3cdnroew said:The other cows didn't have a problem delivering their long legged calves, so maybe it was a combination of the cow having smaller hips
It may be stupid, but I didn't really give it any thought as the heifer is the same size as the mother. In this case, the heifer survived and the 5 calf mother died. No way to predict that. :frowns: But rest assured that I will no longer breed any somewhat small cows and I had previously told myself (long before any of this even happened) that after my last held back heifer calves, I will not deal with any more heifers. Once the final one calves in April, I am done with heifers.
dun":1dog7lnh said:You do know that there is a value you can use to calculate (roughly) what the yearling size would be based on days of age. The magic number is .27square cm per day (but remember the anomaly). The heifer of ours that failed wouldn;t even by 137 at a year based on that number and her orginal measurement. The measuring device is a pelvimeter. Since it's something that is used so seldom I prefer to let the vet carry the cost of it.
Missouri has the same kind of program it's called the "Sho Me Select"