Terminal vs Maternal Bulls

JWBrahman

Well-known member
Joined
Apr 4, 2012
Messages
1,677
Thought this guy was a pure Charolais when he showed up here butterball fat. Probably a Charbray. He lost the fat and gained it all back in muscle on pasture while breeding. 24 months old, moderate framed, easy muscling and low maintenance. I take back everything bad I ever said about Char. hahahaha
HL_20140526070136.jpg


Comparison photo, both bulls are moderate framed.
HL_20140526064326.jpg


Profile shot from the same side as Charbray. Different phenotype for different kinds of breeding.
HL_20140526064416.jpg
 
The way I see it the Brazil beef is off the table for now so it is time to mash the scales.

Anybody ever have a skirt steak from one of the Char x Brimmer x Baldie steers? Mexican ranch hands grilled one the other day and if you ask me it was better than any Prime Rib I have ever eaten.
 
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases. Product prices and availability are accurate as of the date/time indicated and are subject to change.
Char bulls on F1 Tigerstripes are taking over this area, too. A few years ago there were only a couple of big herds that weren't 100% black hided cattle. Now I would say that it is about 50% black cattle and 50% other.

Joking about him being a Charbray because he had some loose skin when he lost all of that feed fat. :lol2:
But, with Charolais you never know because they cover up Brimmer genes better than anything else.
 
JWBrahman said:
Thought this guy was a pure Charolais when he showed up here butterball fat. Probably a Charbray. He lost the fat and gained it all back in muscle on pasture while breeding. 24 months old, moderate framed, easy muscling and low maintenance. I take back everything bad I ever said about Char. hahahaha
HL_20140526070136.jpg

He probably heard a rumor and was afraid of being replaced by a "Hooter" bull. :lol2:
 
He looks like a purebred Char to me. And I much prefer him over the Hereford. I'd rather have replacements out of the Char bull you have pictured than the Hereford pictured, too.
 
Thanks Roan. I personally wouldn't keep a female around with any Char, but they work for other people. Some Charolais are as late maturing as Brahman. But I think we can get a lot of heifers together for deep-pocketed young cattleman like yourself.
 
JWBrahman":30y4pgao said:
Thanks Roan. I personally wouldn't keep a female around with any Char, but they work for other people. Some Charolais are as late maturing as Brahman. But I think we can get a lot of heifers together for deep-pocketed young cattleman like yourself.

There are Charolais cattle at both ends of the spectrum. Don't enslave your mind to 1970's stereotypes regarding the usefulness of a particular breed. "There are Angus bulls w/ 100lb bws and 1100lb Charolais cows- throw preconceived notions, in terms of a breed as a whole, out the window!!" The Charolais bull pictured is a superior specimen to the Hereford regardless of your goals. The char is definitely not too coarse made as to be considered only a 'terminal' bull.

Id be all over a group of F1 buckskin baldies -- keep me in mind ;-)
 
If one wants maternal breeds one does not transform terminal breeds, one simply take maternal breeds. And for the sake of argument: charolais is one terminal breed.
 
You're behind the curve-- whether you want to transform them or not is irrelevant as they have ALREADY been transformed. Debruycker Charolais has some amazing maternal bulls, for example.
 
From your perspective the right side of the (bell)curve is "behind the curve"... :banana: :banana: :banana:
 
What you're ignoring is that each breed has their own bell curve.. each with relatively the same distribution too..
 

Latest posts

Back
Top