frenchie
Well-known member
Oldtimer":1y5guqfl said:frenchie":1y5guqfl said:Oldtimer":1y5guqfl said:frenchie- I get the impression you don't trust USDA's "sound science" :???:
What have you got to hide Ot :?:
Oldtimer":1y5guqfl said:I have nothing to hide- but I'm not sure about USDA...Except you and many Canucks chastised R-CALF when they questioned USDA before and took them to court to try and get them to prove their "sound science"..... ;-)
I consider this a trade issue.OT..not a health issue.. out of a 50 million U.k population about a 150 people died of vCJD..How is this possible when there were thousands of B.s.e cases.. I.M.H.O....you have a better chance of being stuck by lightning
Considering the fact you are & were trying to put me out of business.. And you were and are willing to destroy beef demand to do so....I feel no sympathy for you. You made your : bed now lay in it...like the !@#@!!@#@!you are. :x
Your goverment insists that as a requirement for trade that Canada test more cattle.. to get an accurate idea of b.s.e infection .We are doing so..
And yet your gov,t insists that even though B.S.E has been found domesticly within your own country.. they are stopping testing :roll:
Furthermore add to this that the test that you have been using is known to be flawed.... :roll:
Add to that that a former U.S.D.A vet stood up in the Canadian house of Commons and said you were hiding b.s.e cases :roll:
good luck Ot
So in other words you agree that USDA's science may be flawed- and that R-CALF was correct in filing the court action to try and get them to show evidence supporting their policy decisions that were based on that science.......
I think R-Calf and the U.S.D.A are both flawed Ot...