Many purebred breeders have begun raising a composite breed on the side. I agree that many generations need to be established before the composites will be able to match their "proven" purebred counterparts; but I also believe enough people are willing to invest that time.
Here is a quote from the same article
...the bulk of the U.S. commercial
cow herd is Angus...lost their ability to calve a calf weighing
seven percent of their own body weight.
Many of these newly developed composite breeds are created to chase after a short term market imo.
What are we setting ourselves up for? Are many of these composite breeds the set up for less profitable cattle? I've read many articles that cattlemen are getting "smarter" and making more informed decisions about their cattle breeding selections. Yet this doesn't seem very smart at all.
I realize that I too have a composite breed with the Durham Reds, so I am adding to the problem by creating a demand; however, the D.R.'s are mainly used to cross with my Santa bulls to form sets commercial Star5 heifers. So in a way, I am also utilizing a breeding up program to combat the growth of composite breeds. :lol2:
here is a link if anyone wants to read the breed promotion article in its entirity.
http://www.shorthorn.org/_Shorthorn/Documents/Durham Red.pdf
oh yeah,
I would like to think that Breeds such Gerts, Brangus, and Murray Grey have been in existence too long to be considered a composite breed anymore. They also have set requirements for the amount of blood from each parenting breed. In many composites you can have anything more or nothing less than 25% of each of the parenting breeds.