R-CALF in Iowa

Oldtimer

Well-known member
Joined
Jan 19, 2004
Messages
3,922
City & State/Province
Northeast Montana
Bullard takes shots at packers in Iowa appearance

Tuesday, January 17, 2006



By Jean Caspers-Simmet

Agri News staff writer

WAVERLY, Iowa -- Bill Bullard, R-CALF USA CEO, told Iowa State Dairy Association delegates last week that while he doesn't pretend to understand the dairy industry, he does understand the beef industry and they are a part of it.

Dairy accounts for 21 percent of the adult cattle herd in the United States.

R-CALF USA was formed seven years ago to represent the interests of live cattle producers, Bullard said.

While the industry has tried to convince cattle producers that what's good for the packer is also good for the producer, history has shown otherwise. Bullard said that in order to determine what live cattle producers need to do to advance their interests, they need to understand the goals of major meatpackers.

One of their goals is to minimize the financial risk associated with the cyclical nature of the U.S. cattle industry. When U.S. supplies tighten, cattle prices increase, which increases meatpackers' risk and reduces profits.

"To reduce this risk meatpackers expand their supplies of cattle by melding together the herds of Canada, the United States and Mexico into one seamless North American herd," Bullard said.

Packers want to harmonize U.S. animal health and food safety standards to match the lower standards in other countries, Bullard said.

"Meatpackers don't want consumers to perceive any difference in beef, no matter what country the cattle come from,'' he said.

Meatpackers label their products with house brands, but they don't want country-of-origin labels, Bullard said. They want consumers to seek out their label, regardless of where the cattle originated.

Packers also lobby Congress to restrict producer access to trade-remedy laws because packers don't want independent cattle producers to restrict their access to inventories that are less costly than U.S. cattle, Bullard said.

"The guiding light has been that we're all in this together and that if we increase demand it will increase profitability for everyone, but these strategies do not increase profitability for cattle producers,'' Bullard said.

The past three years, producers have received historically high cattle prices, triggered not only by tight supplies, but also increased demand, a reduction in imports, and the packers' reduced access to captive-supply cattle held in Canada, Bullard said.

"The dramatic increase in prices revealed that packers were not keeping their promise to pass profits back to U.S. producers when beef demand increased,'' Bullard said. "Beef demand had actually been on the rise for a full six years before live cattle prices were finally able to respond without the interference from Canadian captive supplies and Canadian imports."

Bullard said the goal of R-CALF USA is to insure that independent cattle producers can continue to set the terms of their production, the terms for their marketing, and receive their competitive share of the consumers' beef dollar from the competitive marketplace.

"Only live cattle producers share the desire to maximize the profitability of the live-cattle segment of our industry," Bullard said. "If producers won't step up to compete to maximize their profitability, no one else in the industry will either."

R-CALF USA, which is based in Montana, has 442 members in Minnesota and 718 in Iowa. Nationwide, there are 18,192 members in 47 states. The organization is the fastest growing cattle organization in the country, Bullard said.
 
Oldtimer":4e97g7iu said:
Packers want to harmonize U.S. animal health and food safety standards to match the lower standards in other countries, Bullard said. .

What lower standards?




Oldtimer":4e97g7iu said:
Packers also lobby Congress to restrict producer access to trade-remedy laws because packers don't want independent cattle producers to restrict their access to inventories that are less costly than U.S. cattle, Bullard said. .

protectnism lives on :lol:



Oldtimer":4e97g7iu said:
The past three years, producers have received historically high cattle prices, triggered not only by tight supplies, but also increased demand, a reduction in imports, and the packers' reduced access to captive-supply cattle held in Canada, Bullard said.

"The dramatic increase in prices revealed that packers were not keeping their promise to pass profits back to U.S. producers when beef demand increased,'' Bullard said. "Beef demand had actually been on the rise for a full six years before live cattle prices were finally able to respond without the interference from Canadian captive supplies and Canadian imports." .

This whole theory has been proven wrong, U.S cattle prices have not crashed.. in fact after some research it appears that 700-800 Cdn and U.S steer calves were recently within pennies per lb after the exchange was figured in.
 
frenchie":uqno3lx1 said:
This whole theory has been proven wrong, U.S cattle prices have not crashed.. in fact after some research it appears that 700-800 Cdn and U.S steer calves were recently within pennies per lb after the exchange was figured in.

"This week a 632 pound calf in Nebraska sells for $225 more than the same calf sold in Alberta. Why should we be happy with that? We have been hit over the head with a baseball bat for so long that it feels good now that we are only being hit over the head with a 2X4. A cow sold in Alberta brings as much as $550 less than if that same cow was sold in Omaha."
--------

So frenchie you're saying this Canadian producer is lying-Eh? Are all the others that posted the same thing lying? You better go over to Agriville and straighten your countrymen out ;-) :lol: :lol: Same with the Canadians on ranchers that said they got $ 27cwt for live fats and $.70 on the rail....What are cull cows bringing? $ 20 cwt...

I'll believe them over your already admitted hate blinded bias......

The border is still effectively closed- so that the multinational packer corporations have not been able to use the Canadian cattle to manipulate the US market price down.....

But I will agree they are raping you-but Canadians won't do anything about it-Just sit and hope the border opens so you can again ride on the shirttails of the US producer- and blame all your problems on R-CALF....
 
Oldtimer":blfzecgh said:
frenchie":blfzecgh said:
This whole theory has been proven wrong, U.S cattle prices have not crashed.. in fact after some research it appears that 700-800 Cdn and U.S steer calves were recently within pennies per lb after the exchange was figured in.

"This week a 632 pound calf in Nebraska sells for $225 more than the same calf sold in Alberta. Why should we be happy with that? We have been hit over the head with a baseball bat for so long that it feels good now that we are only being hit over the head with a 2X4. A cow sold in Alberta brings as much as $550 less than if that same cow was sold in Omaha."
--------

So frenchie you're saying this Canadian producer is lying-Eh? Are all the others that posted the same thing lying? You better go over to Agriville and straighten your countrymen out ;-) :lol: :lol: Same with the Canadians on ranchers that said they got $ 27cwt for live fats and $.70 on the rail....What are cull cows bringing? $ 20 cwt....

.Oldtimer I don,t deny that some of them have seen those prices but when .?and for what... cull cows..

the market report i hold in my hand shows railgrade prices for steers in the 159.00 to178.00 range
depending on location

live prices between 93.00 -107.00 again dependent on location

My report here shows cows at 18-45 depending on quality.




Oldtimer":blfzecgh said:
I'll believe them over your already admitted hate blinded bias..........

. Oldtimer i don,t give a damm what you believe. First of all I was not talking cows i was talking feeder cattle..either get your eyesight checked or pay attention.





the market report i currently have in my hand show cdn 700 -8oo lb feeder steers selling up to 130cwt Cdn in manitoba and Sask to 134cwt Cdn in Alberta



Wheras billings montana 700-799lbs selling for 105 u.s change to112.50 -116 in dodge city and sioux falls115 -116

to figure the exchange

$1cdn =0.8538 U.S
$1U.S=1.1712 cdn

700lb calf at 1.34cdn=938.00cdn or 800.86 U.s.d

700lb calf at 1.16Usd==$812Usd


A whopping $11 a head difference.



Oldtimer":blfzecgh said:
The border is still effectively closed- so that the multinational packer corporations have not been able to use the Canadian cattle to manipulate the US market price down.........

.what did you say when you shot the bull Ot./

Oldtimer":blfzecgh said:
But I will agree they are raping you-but Canadians won't do anything about it-Just sit and hope the border opens so you can again ride on the shirttails of the US producer- and blame all your problems on R-CALF....

.I am not currently complaining about prices OT,and yes I have in the past.

I,m quite happy with a 1.10 for 8OOLB heifers


.I.M.H.O...I,m not too concerned over the O.T.M cattle not going south.
We need those cattle here ..

Except for the fact that i would like to import some bulls from Wyoming And that won,t happen with out Cdn OtMs going south.
 
houstoncutter":272adu2p said:
LOWER STANDARDS........can you say or spell Mexico........ case closed end of story........duh

Then why drag canada into it if mexico has lower standards

heres your sign :dunce:
 
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases. Product prices and availability are accurate as of the date/time indicated and are subject to change.
frenchie: "I am not currently complaining about prices OT,and yes I have in the past.

I,m quite happy with a 1.10 for 8OOLB heifers


.I.M.H.O...I,m not too concerned over the O.T.M cattle not going south.
We need those cattle here .."
_________________________________

And thats what R-CALF is doing-- fighting to keep those good prices...And if the US doesn't have good prices Canada will not have good prices...Your cattle industry is completely dependent on our beef industry to market your product (Canadian producers should demand a tax refund from their meat federation- since its the US taxpayers that fund the marketing of most of Canadas beef ;-) )...Canada also needs to have an M-COOL law so their meat is identified in the world market- they have a good product ,but right now its lumped in with all the junk Mexican, Uruguain, and any of the other 37 countries we import from :( ...

frenchie- you need to join R-CALF so you can help fight to keep happy with the prices........
 
Oldtimer":3vw9y77m said:
frenchie: "I am not currently complaining about prices OT,and yes I have in the past.

I,m quite happy with a 1.10 for 8OOLB heifers


.I.M.H.O...I,m not too concerned over the O.T.M cattle not going south.
We need those cattle here .."
_________________________________

And thats what R-CALF is doing-- fighting to keep those good prices...And if the US doesn't have good prices Canada will not have good prices...Your cattle industry is completely dependent on our beef industry to market your product ........
Not entirely OT we sell beef to others :lol:


Oldtimer":3vw9y77m said:
frenchie- you need to join R-CALF

Ok yep sure..you go down to the mail box and wait checks in the mail promise ;-) :lol:
 

Latest posts

Back
Top