R-CALF in D.C.

Oldtimer

Well-known member
Joined
Jan 19, 2004
Messages
3,922
City & State/Province
Northeast Montana
CattleNetwork_Today 2/19/2007 2:29:00 PM


R-CALF: Members ‘Stampede’ Into Nation’s Capitol To Discuss Producer Issues



Washington, D.C. – More than five dozen R-CALF USA volunteers from 20 states traveled to the nation’s capitol for a three-day ‘Stampede’ to discuss issues important to the U.S. cattle industry with members of Congress, representatives of federal agencies, including Agriculture Secretary Mike Johanns, as well as Administration representatives, and others who have an interest in industry regulations.



“Our members braved the cold and the Valentine’s Day blizzard to make sure that the concerns of independent cattle producers were represented on Capitol Hill,” said R-CALF USA Government Relations Coordinator Abra Belke. “Even as many government offices were closing due to the inclement weather, our members ‘cowboyed up’ and trudged through the storm to make sure that our issues were discussed with members of Congress, as well as high-level Administration officials.”



R-CALF USA Checkoff Committee Chair Jim Hanna said the Stampede gave members an excellent opportunity to meet with the decision-makers in Washington, D.C., so they would understand the organization’s position on reforming the Beef Checkoff Program to promote U.S.A. beef instead of generic beef products, and the need for more oversight and more information available to producers with regard to how Beef Checkoff dollars are spent.



“We had really good reception on the Checkoff reforms, especially with Secretary Johanns, who took a lot of notes and paid really close attention when we were talking,” Hanna said. “We didn’t receive any argument or disagreement about the changes that need to be made. A lot of the issues we take to Congress, we end up trying to defend and explain our position, but with the Checkoff survey results so strongly in our favor, USDA basically can’t argue with those. I think R-CALF can look forward to accomplishing a lot regarding the Beef Checkoff during the coming year.”



Other topics of concern R-CALF USA members discussed included moving up the implementation date of Country-of-Origin Labeling (COOL), encouraging the U.S. Department of Agriculture to withdraw its proposed Rule 2 that deals with resuming imports of Canadian cattle over 30 months (OTM) of age, banning captive-supply and livestock ownership practices of meat packers, and correcting the Interstate Meat Inspection Act so smaller packers can ship their products across state lines. R-CALF USA CEO Bill Bullard said these are the core issues that affect the profitability of U.S. cattle producers, and Stampede participants did an outstanding job of elevating these issues for the new Congress.



This was the second time for Louisiana cattle producer Mike Kovac to participate in R-CALF USA’s Stampede. He said this year was even better than last February’s event.



“It seems like Congress and USDA listened more than they did last year and just had a better understanding of what U.S. cattle producers need,” Kovac said. “It seemed like everybody was more receptive. We discussed including a cattle chapter in the upcoming Farm Bill to resolve competition issues, and we also discussed moving up the implementation date for COOL, and addressing producer concerns about the Checkoff.



“The trip was well worthwhile because it’s important that Congress hear from producers,” Kovac continued. “It’s also important that they know we have to pay our own way to participate in the R-CALF Stampede, and that they know we think it’s worth spending $1,500 or more of our own money to make sure members of Congress hear our message.”

Louis Day, of Valentine, Neb., echoed that sentiment.

“I thought it was worth all the expense and the time because on the first day we got to meet with both of our Senators and all three of our Congressmen,” Day said. “My biggest deal was to stress what a stranglehold the multinational packers have on captive supplies, and to explain that for every 1 percent of supply they control, they can control their profits by 2 percent.”



R-CALF USA Wisconsin Membership Chair Kevin Kirschbaum said he was pleased to learn that his Senators and Representatives are on board with most of the organization’s issues.



“They were very appreciative to see us – their constituents – come to them with thoughts and ideas,” Kirschbaum said. “They all were very open-minded, and all understood the common-sense advantages of COOL, interstate shipment of meat, and many of our other concerns. It was great to see all the other R-CALF ranchers from across the country in our nation’s capitol supporting their industry.”



Bullard said participants again made history by demonstrating to our nation’s leaders that there are real people whose lives are affected by these issues.



“Each and every one of the visits our members made will elevate the stature of these issues, and the people they spoke with will remember these meetings for a long time to come,” Bullard said. “The annual Stampede strengthens R-CALF’s ability to establish a solid foundation that the organization will continue to build upon throughout the year to advance these important matters.



“Every Stampede participant is sincerely committed to improving the U.S. cattle industry and supporting what Congress is all about – and that’s the maintenance of a free enterprise system – a system that promotes and facilitates an open and competitive marketplace,” Bullard concluded. “R-CALF USA members are the ones delivering that message, and it is one powerful message.”
 
Wow, a person has to read carefully or you could draw thw wrong conclusions. More than 5 dozen R-CALF members in on march on washington , so less than 6 dozen but more than 5 so could be 61 people. Do you think the offices were closing due to wether or because they saw R-CALF coming ? Hanna stated didn't recieve any disagreement with changes that need to be made he was talking Johanns about only the beef checkoff, why didn't the R-CALF membership push their opinion on rule 2 , they had Johanns there ? Did your membership really need to go to washington to have an meeting and internal discussion , that could have been done in Denver? it was mentioned the goverment listened to R-Calf members more this year, Did they listen at all last year ? It is written that your members thought it was worth the expense of the trip because they got to meet both of their senators and all 3 of their congressmen - is he stating ownership of these elected officials is their vote bought and paid for by R-calf ? Another member was speaking about his representatives and talk to them about his thoughts and ideas. Could this be anymore unclear? It was great to see all other R-calf from across the country?????? I don't know what you guys consider sucess but when I went to my nations capitol to confront the goverment about concerns there was over 2000 farmers attending. Which would draw more attention 61 guys making noise or 2000 guys making noise. Maybe you guys need to get more of the membership to go to washington,just use the funds raised at your fundraisers to pay for district or state R-calf representatives to go washington instead of paying exhobitant saleries to your executives?
 
Yep- and I know at least 5-6 Montana folks had a chance to meet with Senator Tester in D.C.-he even posted it on his website- several others with Baucus and Rehberg...I personally got a chance to talk with Tester on Sunday for a few minutes--he is still 110% behind M-COOL (co-sponsored the Montana M-COOL law when he was a State Senator) and has been getting the notifications I sent them all on the USDA's inability to keep track of Canadian cattle- and how if they can't track those in sealed trucks, how can they track older high risk cattle going all over the country...

It sounded to me like he is going to take the same stance as Sen. Baucus told me he was doing - wait until the comment period is over--see what the comments are and see where USDA is going (if they will postpone or stop the rule on their own) and then take stronger action if necessary.....They agree that USDA's rule 2 is bad as written and needs to be postponed and changed- but they want to let the process run its course....
 
Ot am i mistaken but don't you need more than 3 senators to pass laws ? 5 or 6 people ! LOL ! When the farm group i went with to our capital 20 of our group met with our Ag. minister and P.M. so i would think your group would have only been considered sucessful if many more people met with your President and Ag, Sec. Simply meeting with senators from your state is a politician playing to his electorate. Only an moron senator would not meet with his constituants. As far as the senator they only have a couple of minutes for an voter, what a joke when in Ottawa i met with my fed ag minister and MP which is like senator on congressman all in 1. I met with them for 1 1/2 hours. So this senator is who got all your R-calf propaganda you sent him , and you sad it sounds to you like Tester has the same stance as Baccus. I would expect nothing less you guys elected them. Next time have them sign something yopu know something tangible that you can show others. Amazing when you are in their face they promise to work for your group if the result of the comment period is not what you want, but they are politicians the proof will be what will they do if the USDA wants to open the border. As for waiting to the end of the comment period they are just doing due diligence as they don't want to look like fools.
 

Latest posts

Back
Top