...DNA of humans differs from chimpanzee DNA by as little as 1% and from gorillas by only 2%.
This makes it appear to those who are uneducated in the science of genetics, that evolution is
quite obviously correct and humans and primates are virtually cousins. However, what they never
seem to mention is that the human DNA tree has three billion base pairs and so 1% of this is in
fact, 30 million base pairs. Now, 30 million base pairs is, in reality, a tremendous amount of
difference between the two species by any measure. And of course with Gorillas, that would be
60 million base pairs.
Primates also suffer from very few genetic disorders apart from perhaps Albinism, which is a
gene common in a variety of animals groups, including humans. By way of comparison, humans
have over 4,000 genetic disorders; several that will most definitely kill absolutely every victim!
So, are we asked to believe that these disorders manifested in our evolution to a ‘higher and
more improved species’?
One of the most undeniable and obvious differences of all between the species can also be
found in the fact that primates have 48 chromosomes yet humans, who are considered to be vastly
superior to them in the evolutionary chain have only 46 chromosomes! So, how in the world
could we just lose two full chromosomes in this ‘evolutionary improvement process’ we are
supposed to have undergone? Two full chromosomes is an awful lot of DNA to just disappear!
Primates are also much stronger than humans, in fact on a pound for pound ratio, about 5 to ten
times stronger, even small monkeys. If we really evolved from primates then apart from losing
chromosomes, how did we also become so puny and weak compared to our ‘ancestors’ in this
‘improvement process?’
When analysed, nothing about evolution makes any logical sense at all really.
The list goes on: Human bones are far lighter than any primate bones or Neanderthal or any
other so called ‘ancestral’ species; and more. It was explained well in a recent article by Lloyd
Pye explains in which he made the following observations:
“Skin: Human skin is not well adapted to the amount of sunlight striking Earth. It can be
modified to survive extended exposure by greatly increasing melanin (its dark pigment) at its
surface, which only the Negro and Aborigine races have achieved. All others must cover
themselves with clothing or frequent shade or both, or sicken from radiation poisoning.
“Body Hair: Primates need not worry about direct exposure to sunlight because they are
covered from head to toe in a distinctive pattern of long body-hair. Because they are quadrupeds
(move on all fours), the thickest hair is on their back, the thinnest on the chest and abdomen.
Humans have lost the all-over pelt, and we have completely switched our area of thickness to the
chest and abdomen while wearing the thin part on our back.
“Fat: Humans have ten times as many fat cells attached to the underside of their skin as
primates. If a primate is wounded by a gash or tear in the skin, when the bleeding stops the
wound's edges lie flat near each other and can quickly close the wound by a process called
"contracture". In humans, the fat layer is so thick that it pushes up through wounds and makes
contracture difficult if not impossible. Also, contrary to the propaganda to try to explain this
oddity, the fat under human skin does not compensate for the body hair we have lost. Only in
water is its insulating capacity useful; in air, it is minimal at best.
“Head Hair: All primates have head hair that grows to a certain length and then stops. Human
head hair grows to such lengths that it could be dangerous in a primitive situation. Thus, we have
been forced to cut our head hair since we became a species, which may account for some of the
sharp flakes of stones that are considered primitive hominid "tools".
“Fingernails and Toenails: All primates have fingernails and toenails that grow to a certain
length and then stop, never needing paring. Human fingernails and toenails have always needed
paring. Again, maybe those stone "tools" were not only for butchering animals.
“Skull: The human skull is nothing like the primate skull. There is hardly any fair
morphological comparison to be made, apart from the general parts being the same. Their design
and assembly are so radically different as to make attempts at comparison useless.
“Brains: The comparison here is even more radical because human brains are so vastly
different. (To say "improved" or "superior" is unfair and not germane, because primate brains
work perfectly well for what primates have to do to live and reproduce.)
“Locomotion: The comparison here is easily as wide as the comparison of brains and skulls.
Humans are bipedal; primates are quadrupeds. That says more than enough.
“Speech: Human throats are completely redesigned relative to primate throats. The larynx has
dropped to a much lower position, so humans can break typical primate sounds into the tiny
pieces of sound (by modulation) that have come to be human speech.
“Sex: Primate Females have oestrous cycles and are sexually receptive only at special times.
Human females have no oestrous cycle in the primate sense and are continually receptive to sex.”
