NCBA Statement on NEGATIVE Cow

Texan

Well-known member
Joined
Jun 3, 2004
Messages
1,887
City & State/Province
East Texas
NCBA Statement on USDA Announcement Regarding BSE Negative Test Result
Jan Lyons, cattle producer, Manhattan, Kansas
National Cattlemen’s Beef Association

November 23, 2004



“The United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) has announced the negative test results for Bovine Spongiform Encephalopathy (BSE, also known as mad cow disease) on an animal whose initial rapid screening test results were inconclusive. Using multiple gold-standard tests, the government has confirmed that the animal did not have BSE.

“This is not an unexpected situation and proves why it is important to await the final test results from USDA’s National Veterinary Services Laboratory.

“As part of USDA’s enhanced BSE surveillance program, a rapid screening test is used as the first step in a two-part testing process. Because the rapid tests are sensitive, they are subject to occasional inconclusive results that later prove to be negative.

“The USDA will continue the enhanced BSE surveillance program it launched June 2004 to assess the prevalence of this disease, if it exists, in this country. To date, more than 121,000 animals have been tested, and all animals have tested negative.

“What Americans need to know is that the U.S. government and cattle industry will continue to protect public and animal health from BSE. For example, this animal never entered the human food supply, nor did it enter the animal feed chain, proving the systems in place are working to protect public and animal health.

“While this animal did not have BSE, the government has indicated that finding some additional cases of the disease is possible through the enhanced surveillance program. In addition to keeping this particular animal out of the food supply, beef is safe from BSE because anything that could potentially carry BSE is prohibited from entering the food supply. Importantly, BSE infectivity has not been found in beef, including steaks, roasts and ground beef.

“As America’s beef producers, our number-one priority is producing the safest beef in the world. Our very livelihood depends on it. As a rancher, a mother and a grandmother, I know the beef I produce is served in homes around the world, including my family’s home. That’s why we will continue to work with the government and top scientists, as we have over the past 15 years, to maintain safeguards that today are protecting consumers and our cattle from BSE.”

# # #

For more information, please visit http://www.bseinfo.org.
 
Now it would be nice if NCBA, would spend a few of those checkoff dollasrs. This false positive junk has got to come to a end.
 
houstoncutter":3da20xyt said:
Now it would be nice if NCBA, would spend a few of those checkoff dollasrs. This false positive junk has got to come to a end.

How will so called spending a few of those checkoff dollars make it nice.

Would you prefer to have confirmed positives rather than false politives.
 
la4angus":16ru108q said:
How will so called spending a few of those checkoff dollars make it nice.
LA, he wants NCBA to adopt Leo's strategy of using trial lawyers to determine our future. Don't like the way USDA does something? Aww Hell! No problem! Just sue 'em!
 
If the USDA doesnt like the way you do business, you end up in court.... I didnt make up the rules, I just try to follow them... If a animal is positive everyone should be informed, but until that test is positive USDA sould keep their traps shut. I do not belong to NCBA anymore, they speak for the packer. It would be nice to see em grow a set of cods , and stir things up.
 
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases. Product prices and availability are accurate as of the date/time indicated and are subject to change.
houstoncutter":1k7t7925 said:
I do not belong to NCBA anymore, they speak for the packer. It would be nice to see em grow a set of cods , and stir things up.
You know, some of you packer haters, USDA haters and NCBA haters never cease to amaze me with your reasoning. I guess I'm just different. I think of the packer as one of my customers. At the very least, he is your customer's customer. The packer is our conduit to the consumer.

Yeah, I'm different than you guys. I'm so stupid and naive as to want my customer to be profitable and successful. I feel like we're all part of the same production chain that starts with the cow-calf guy and ends on the plate. Now, how the Hell are we going to do that on a large scale without a profitable packing industry?

As for the desire to see NCBA "grow a set of cods, and stir things up," what a brilliant concept for consumer confidence. Stir up more turmoil within our industry. More infighting. An industry already divided and getting worse every day. Yeah. Brilliant concept.........
 
Ok Texan, I will admit I am kinda slow, but I cant follow your logic. Do you really thinks its good for the consumer to be bombarded with news reports of the latest mad cow report in the media? You might notice the reports that it was false havent even made the air waves.

As for being the packers friend, nope, not me. Many years ago we had anti-monoply laws that were inforced. If things continue, we will no longer be cattlemen or cattlewomen. We will be like chickenfarmers, who just happen to raise bovines. Perhaps that is the way has to be. What a waste of a honorable profession. I can not speak for you but for me I will break up the land and geta pair of white shoes and belt, to...lol...to sell ranchettes. Happy Thanksgiving to you and yours.. Rodney :D
 
houstoncutter":2gpju2ue said:
Do you really thinks its good for the consumer to be bombarded with news reports of the latest mad cow report in the media? You might notice the reports that it was false havent even made the air waves.
Cutter, I would prefer that there never be any reports of BSE, period! Even if they confirm a positive. Because to me it is a non-issue. Its not an animal health issue, in my opinion. Its not a human health issue of significant importance. In my opinion, it is nothing more than a consumer concern. But, since it is a concern, I believe that if we continue to be completely honest and forthcoming with them, they will trust us to tell them what they need to know. We will have more credibility when bad news really hits. I think they will be more content knowing that we are taking care of any problem instead of trying to hide it. Just my opinion.

And, I did see a report of the negative confirmation on Fox News. But I agree with you that the good news is never as prominent. Not just on this issue, but everything. Seems like good news is never newsworthy.

houstoncutter":2gpju2ue said:
If things continue, we will no longer be cattlemen or cattlewomen. We will be like chickenfarmers, who just happen to raise bovines. Perhaps that is the way has to be. What a waste of a honorable profession. I can not speak for you but for me I will break up the land and geta pair of white shoes and belt, to...lol...to sell ranchettes.
I'd hate for any of us to have Tyson gate signs. But, I am sure that more integration is in our future. How much? How soon? Who knows? Not a grand conspiracy, just the natural evolution of business to grow and prosper. Its already happening in our marketing segment, too. I can think of several salebarns that I have done business with in the past that are now gone. And others grow. Look at Superior Livestock. Are you suggesting that the government should use the P&S Act to limit their ability to grow?

I'd hate to see you break up your place and sell ranchettes. That's not hardly any way to save our honorable profession, either. But, if you do decide to sell out, I hope that your customers will be people who are successful and profitable. Just like I want the packers to be. We all need customers like that, don't we?
 
Texan":2n2dwmrr said:
But, I am sure that more integration is in our future. How much? How soon? Who knows? Not a grand conspiracy, just the natural evolution of business to grow and prosper. Its already happening in our marketing segment, too...

IMO the main obstacle to complete vertical integration in the beef industry is land requirements. They have integrated as far down from slaughter as possible via feedlots, but early in the production cycle there is no viable substitute for grazing. It can be done but it is cost prohibitive. As long as land requirements remain a barrier to entry the producer will be able to preserve some degree of autonomy. The biggest threat to the producers’ independence is not packers competing at our level. It is packers meddling and controlling via proxy through their influence over politicians and government agencies. JMO

Craig-TX
 

Latest posts

Back
Top