gizmom":i9y73t7a said:
Question - several of you picked 2 how bout giving some reasons as to why. i must be missing something because he looks pencil gutted to me and he narrows up in the rear end. Not to mention he doesn't carry his muscling down into the lower quarter.
Gizmom
This is waht i said when i picked him and i stand by it.
2 and 5 if 2's right foot was back he would look even better but he has a great topline a long hip and good depth.
To address a couple of your points how can you tell how far down he carries his muscle when all you can see is one outside gaskin muscle on a leg that is stretched forward, thereby making it look worse than it really is..
He is far from pencil gutted you are mistaking the weak backs on most of the other calves for them being deep or soggy. What they are is too weak backed to carry their weight in their gut.
# 2 also has a flawless tailset and topline. and is not over conditioned like a couple are. Heck as bad as the pictures are you can see pones on some of them!. Young bulls should not be that fat!
I would like him a little smoother in the shoulder but there is no doubt that he is a bull. He also has a real good long hip. I have become a firm believer that those bulls that lay on cows and stifle them or worse are those bulls that are short hipped and weak backed. They are not athletic and it shows in their inability to breed without damaging a cow when they get older and heavier!