And that may be true. I have no idea about the others, but he is still facing civil cases. He may end up broke.It was my understanding that the Constand case was the last one to come up that was still within the statute of limitations... so ol' BC looks to be home free now.
Got him off on a technicality, freakin lawyers!They didn't rule that he didn't do it, but a previous DA had promised him that they would not press charges, and based on this he gave sworn testimony in a civil case that was used against him in the criminal case. This only applies to the charges in the Constand case. He can still be tried on all of the other cases if they choose.
Hardly a technicality. It was the Fifth Amendment. The real culprit here was the dmubazz original DA that said that he would not be charged. The court found "Promissory Estoppel" Because, where Cosby relied on that promise he gave sworn testimony in a civil case where he admitted he did a lot of the abuse. In doing that he gave up his Fifth Amendment rights.Got him off on a technicality, freakin lawyers!![]()
NO. The 2nd DA was the dmubzz. Gloria Alred and her gang of 33 were tying up the courts with unwinnable cases, 1 case had already ended in a hung jury, time was running out, one woman demanded 40 million or she would go public that she was his daughter by rape. Cosby could take a knee and run out the clock. As the authorized agent of the justice department the original DA knew the only way to clear the court system of these high profile cases and save the state gazillions in court costs was to have Cosby's lawyers waive his 5th amendment rights and the due process clause of the the 14th amendment and have Cosby testify against himself.Hardly a technicality. It was the Fifth Amendment. The real culprit here was the dmubazz original DA
On this, we can agree.Moral of the story: Never trust a government to honor their 'treaty'.![]()
I recognized the doohickey......Somebody can't take a joke, note the laughing doohickey.
justice department of the State of PennsylvaniaOn this, we can agree.
But this was not a Justice Department case, it was a State case.
Sorry, my misunderstanding.justice department of the State of Pennsylvania
same terminology... didn't think I needed to spell out every little detail