Global Warming Scientist To Be Cross-examined Under Oath
Professor Michael Mann of Penn State filed suit in 2012 against some folks who published some things he didn't like.
http://www.scribd.com/doc/116376433/Nat ... 2012-08-22
http://www.scribd.com/doc/111163636/201 ... -Complaint
http://www.theregister.co.uk/2009/08/13/cru_missing/
These procedings need to be carried on live tv. Remember "Science" claims there is global warming, it's our fault and we can fix it. Should that not be on live TV? :nod:
Liz
Professor Michael Mann of Penn State filed suit in 2012 against some folks who published some things he didn't like.
http://www.scribd.com/doc/116376433/Nat ... 2012-08-22
http://www.scribd.com/doc/111163636/201 ... -Complaint
http://www.scribd.com/doc/116374522/7-C ... ce-on-WongThe scientific community is now so polarised on the controversial issue of dangerous global warming that proper due diligence on the matter can only be achieved where competent scientific witnesses are cross-examined under oath and under the strictest rules of evidence.
http://www.nationalreview.com/articles/ ... rich-lowryUsually, you don't welcome a nuisance lawsuit, because it's a nuisance. It consumes time. It costs money. But this is a different matter in light of one word: discovery.
If Mann sues us, the materials we will need to mount a full defense will be extremely wide-ranging. So if he files a complaint, we will be doing more than fighting a nuisance lawsuit; we will be embarking on a journalistic project of great interest to us and our readers.
http://www.theregister.co.uk/2009/08/13/cru_missing/
These procedings need to be carried on live tv. Remember "Science" claims there is global warming, it's our fault and we can fix it. Should that not be on live TV? :nod:
Liz