inbredredneck
Well-known member
- Joined
- Jun 13, 2011
- Messages
- 683
Just curious.
I've always had a question.dun":3d2enkzr said:Probably or possibly. Since we adhere to all with holdings I'll never know for sure
If there hasn;t been one established it probably isn;t approved for use on meat animals. Or if it is that new why would you want to try it. Makes it pretty simple.inbredredneck":1nsw6t1v said:I've always had a question.dun":1nsw6t1v said:Probably or possibly. Since we adhere to all with holdings I'll never know for sure
How would a person adhere to a withholding when there hasn't been one established yet.
Yeah I would never use unapproved drugs on cattle but I have seen people admit to it before.dun":1yw5lw5f said:If there hasn;t been one established it probably isn;t approved for use on meat animals. Or if it is that new why would you want to try it. Makes it pretty simple.inbredredneck":1yw5lw5f said:I've always had a question.dun":1yw5lw5f said:Probably or possibly. Since we adhere to all with holdings I'll never know for sure
How would a person adhere to a withholding when there hasn't been one established yet.
Gonna need to disagree with you on this bb338. Never have I ever seen custom processed beef tested. maybe down south they do I'm not sure, but certainly not here.bigbull338":2zvwuzu9 said:all of the cattle that are butchered are checked for drug residues.an if 1 comes up hot they notify the owner.so always remember to follow drug labels.
You would know, if you know where you sold them.Sir Loin":3o71oc22 said:Don’t know!
If it was and tested negative, how would you know?
SL
How’s that?You would know, if you know where you sold them.
Try reading the bottle, box or pamphlet in the box.How would a person adhere to a withholding when there hasn't been one established yet.
So if the drug was not labeled for use in cattle there would be no withholding date for cattle? So a person would be able treat and ship directly according to you right?Sir Loin":30hocl7v said:Try reading the bottle, box or pamphlet in the box.
If there is no withholding period stated, then there is none.
SL
If you have sold truckloads to slaughter houses they have been tested and if you have never been notified you are operating your beef operation correctly sir.Sir Loin":3l6n4sec said:How’s that?
I’ve sent truck loads to the slaughter house and I don’t know if they were tested or not.
Do slaughter houses notify you when they test and notify you of negative results as well as positive results?
I have never been notified either way.SL
If it isn;t labeled for cattle it's not supposed to be used on cattle. Nitrofuracin is a perfect example. It was used for years on cattle but has been illegal for use on cattle since 2002.inbredredneck":2xbf1s03 said:So if the drug was not labeled for use in cattle there would be no withholding date for cattle? So a person would be able treat and ship directly according to you right?Sir Loin":2xbf1s03 said:Try reading the bottle, box or pamphlet in the box.
If there is no withholding period stated, then there is none.
SL
Why would a person use a drug unlabeled for cattle on cattle dun?dun":ras2ed96 said:If it isn;t labeled for cattle it's not supposed to be used on cattle. Nitrofuracin is a perfect example. It was used for years on cattle but has been illegal for use on cattle since 2002.inbredredneck":ras2ed96 said:So if the drug was not labeled for use in cattle there would be no withholding date for cattle? So a person would be able treat and ship directly according to you right?Sir Loin":ras2ed96 said:Try reading the bottle, box or pamphlet in the box.
If there is no withholding period stated, then there is none.
SL
Are you drinking?? Or doing drugs?So if the drug was not labeled for use in cattle there would be no withholding date for cattle?
Not under you’re hypothetical example, no.So a person would be able treat and ship directly according to you right?
OK! But that is an assumption on your part. How do you know they were tested?If you have sold truckloads to slaughter houses they have been tested and if you have never been notified you are operating your beef operation correctly sir.
SL I just know for a fact that a certain poster, has done just what I am questioning about.Sir Loin":damlp0ar said:inbredredneck
Re:
Are you drinking?? Or doing drugs?So if the drug was not labeled for use in cattle there would be no withholding date for cattle?
If you are giving it to cattle and it is not labeled for cattle, why are you giving it to cattle??
Give me an example.
Not under you’re hypothetical example, no.So a person would be able treat and ship directly according to you right?
If a tree falls in the woods, does it make a sound?
Re:
OK! But that is an assumption on your part. How do you know they were tested?If you have sold truckloads to slaughter houses they have been tested and if you have never been notified you are operating your beef operation correctly sir.
But my answer is still the same!
Q. Have you ever had your beef checked for drug residues at slaughter?
My A. Don’t know!
SL
Will you spit it out! What are you trying to say?I just know for a fact that a certain poster, has done just what I am questioning about.
No point to be made, just trying to figure out why it happens.Sir Loin":247ksggt said:Will you spit it out! What are you trying to say?I just know for a fact that a certain poster, has done just what I am questioning about.
That some people give cattle drugs that are not labeled for use in cattle ?
I suppose there are, so what’s your point? How do you know that these “some people” administered the drug and then shipped the cattle to slaughter and not kept them on the farm or that the cattle died on their own?
I have given antibiotics that were prescribed for my horse’s injured foot to my bull for his injured foot. But I didn’t ship either out to slaughter. So what?
SL