So you are telling us the price of wheat is high because of ethanol. Are they using wheat for the production of ethanol now? You are the all knowing when it comes to ethanol so I'm sure you are correct. I think the price of wheat is high because of supply and demand. 53.9 million acres of wheat in 1999 60.5 million acres of wheat in 2007. It is not an acerage problem it is a supply problem. A supply shortage is a result of a demand for a product. Now maybe they are using it to produce ethanol you are the all knowing on that. I have not seen it as the feedstock for any of the plants I've ever been to. I think this might be one of those cases like roundup wears off. Consider the source of said statement when considering the truth.mnmtranching":1mc0wd9m said:Yes Larry, It's Ethanol. And the increased demand for corn ethanol thats been putting the pressure on acres available for other feed grains. Corn is the number 1 crop and all feed crops including wheat will follow the corn markets.
The price of wheat is being driven by demand. The millers are not paying a plus basis on cash wheat because of speculators fighting over acres they are paying a plus basis because they need wheat to mill plain and simple. It is a supply shortage. Now a shortage of wheat will encouarge more acres be planted to wheat. That in itself will raise prices for soybeans and corn because the end consumers of both soybeans and corn will be trying to keep the acres they need to meet their demand. So we should really be blaming wheat for all the high grain prices. Demand for a product is what raises the price of products if they need to meet demand they need to buy acres when trying to get acres away from other crops now those end users need to raise their prices. Blaming ethanol is pointing the finger the wrong way. There are piles of corn at elevators everywhere some have been there for 3 to 4 years. Corn is trying to protect it's acres same as beans. The commodity with short stocks and high demand is where the price increases start. And wheat is it. As a trader you know that all to well.Sugarman":2oo9j1cn said:Somn,
Ethanol is part of the cause for the grain crops to increase. In the wheat market- the U.S. is currently the only game in town due to a shortage of world production. Wheat and soy acres will continue to be displaced to satisfy the demand for corn. With all that being said- hedge funds are also very active in these markets as well- those funds are like electronic herds moving the market any which way they please. We have not seen increases in cotton and sugar because both of those have healthy Stocks-to-Use ratios and neither of their demands are increasing.
Ok then all knowing what drives prices supply or acres? Do you see cotton or sugar rising? Are they not also planted on acres of land? Wonder why they haven't moved higher? Did you read sugarmans post or do you know more than him also. They have a positive stocks-to-use ratio and there demand is not rising. Keep working on an explanation about how roundup wears off.mnmtranching":16qgkxtb said:Wonder what it would be like to know "almost nothing about almost everything" :frowns:
So are you saying it is the livestock feeders fault for the rising cost of grains?auctionboy":2geuvur6 said:Cotton and sugar are not competing as livestock feed. It tends to make my cows act hyper.
I think as corn gets higher it is replaced by other grains in rations and those other grains demand goes up so there price follows! The "fault" is all on corn based ethnol. I thought this was obvious?somn":3cgjo8p1 said:So are you saying it is the livestock feeders fault for the rising cost of grains?auctionboy":3cgjo8p1 said:Cotton and sugar are not competing as livestock feed. It tends to make my cows act hyper.