CITY GUY

[M-5]

Everyone here should know how to use the search button , When you reply to the threads from 10yrs ago chances are your only talking to yourself. Maybe others find it useful , I find IT ANNOYING! and its clutters up current 2016 topics.

 

[inyati13]

Everyone here should know how to use the search button , When you reply to the threads from 10yrs ago chances are your only talking to yourself. Maybe others find it useful , I find IT ANNOYING! and its clutters up current 2016 topics.

Come on Darryl: None of the posts are hateful, mean spirited or obnoxious in the normal meaning of the word. If we stop replying to subjects that have been previously posted, the forum is doomed.

Candidly, I rarely notice all the commotion other users get upset about. It is too easy to skip over.

 

[M-5]

Everyone here should know how to use the search button , When you reply to the threads from 10yrs ago chances are your only talking to yourself. Maybe others find it useful , I find IT ANNOYING! and its clutters up current 2016 topics.

Come on Darryl: None of the posts are hateful, mean spirited or obnoxious in the normal meaning of the word. If we stop replying to subjects that have been previously posted, the forum is doomed.

Candidly, I rarely notice all the commotion other users get upset about. It is too easy to skip over.

Ron, I stated it was annoying , Kinda like a circle fly if you know what I mean.

 

[inyati13]

Everyone here should know how to use the search button , When you reply to the threads from 10yrs ago chances are your only talking to yourself. Maybe others find it useful , I find IT ANNOYING! and its clutters up current 2016 topics.

Come on Darryl: None of the posts are hateful, mean spirited or obnoxious in the normal meaning of the word. If we stop replying to subjects that have been previously posted, the forum is doomed.

Candidly, I rarely notice all the commotion other users get upset about. It is too easy to skip over.

Ron, I stated it was annoying , Kinda like a circle fly if you know what I mean.

I caught that. The Guy is following rules, seems to conduct himself better than some of us. This forum certainly can use the traffic. I don't feel the annoyance.

 

[cowboy43]

What's wrong with living in the past, I wish I could go back to the 50's

 

[M-5]

What's wrong with living in the past, I wish I could go back to the 50's

I guess if that's your thing its ok. Looking back is ok but you have today to make tomorrows past something special

 

[callmefence]

I don't mind him to much.
I did spend 10 minutes reading a thread wondering who the **** are these people. Then I realized it was 10 years old.
It doesn't bother me, but in most cases I think it's more interesting to start a new thread on the subject.

 

[SJB]

troll

 

[red angus 2010]

Everyone here should know how to use the search button , When you reply to the threads from 10yrs ago chances are your only talking to yourself. Maybe others find it useful , I find IT ANNOYING! and its clutters up current 2016 topics.

Narcissists rarely recognize they are the problem.

 

[bball]

I don't mind him to much.
I did spend 10 minutes reading a thread wondering who the be nice are these people. Then I realized it was 10 years old.
It doesn't bother me, but in most cases I think it's more interesting to start a new thread on the subject.

Exact same thing happens to me whenever someone drags up a post from way back.

 

[backhoeboogie]

I don't mind him to much.
I did spend 10 minutes reading a thread wondering who the be nice are these people. Then I realized it was 10 years old.
It doesn't bother me, but in most cases I think it's more interesting to start a new thread on the subject.

Exact same thing happens to me whenever someone drags up a post from way back.

That stuff ticked me off 10 years ago and I finally got over it. Now someone wants to bring it up again? He got banned, got a new name, got banned again, and came back another 7 or 8 times. Turnthatcowloosemaw had done reincarnated a couple of dozen times and morphed into sirloin for quite some time before transposing into medicinewoman.

 

[backhoeboogie]

4Ctophand was a riot to read. No one has mentioned him in forever. Poor kid may not even be alive now with Darwin awards being around.

 

[dun]

4Ctophand was a riot to read. No one has mentioned him in forever. Poor kid may not even be alive now with Darwin awards being around.

I he the guy that could disk 50 acres an hour or some such?

 

[JMJ Farms]

4Ctophand was a riot to read. No one has mentioned him in forever. Poor kid may not even be alive now with Darwin awards being around.

I he the guy that could disk 50 acres an hour or some such?

If he could he would need to run 7 mph with a 60' harrow in a really big field.

 

[regolith]

4Ctophand was a riot to read. No one has mentioned him in forever. Poor kid may not even be alive now with Darwin awards being around.

I he the guy that could disk 50 acres an hour or some such?

If he could he would need to run 7 mph with a 60' harrow in a really big field.

Wouldn't surprise me if it was plausible in 2016.

But seriously, I saw this 'city guy' with an evident lack of basic knowledge apparently trying to teach everyone how to run cattle and just didn't bother clicking on any thread with his name on it.
Haven't found any of these golden oldies yet.

 

[arkie1]

I figured he was a troll when he first showed up or that he at least has an agenda of some sort. I haven't been a member very long but I have stalked all of you long enough :hide: I pretty well had a feel of how things should sound and look on this site. But I have to be honest he doesn't bug me near as much as LLC.

 

[greybeard]

The last time something similar happened it was a current member that just registered a different username to pull a gag/joke etc on the board. Probably the same thing this time. I'd have to look back and see who it was that time--might even be the same miscreant this time.

 

[City Guy]

Thanx, everyone, for the etiquette tips. From now on when I want to reply to a post more than one year old I'll start a new topic. Is that a good plan?

 

[regolith]

"lurk and learn" is also a good plan.
So are you also LLC? I haven't even clicked on any of those threads, just the titles were offputting.

 

[Rafter S]

Thanx, everyone, for the etiquette tips. From now on when I want to reply to a post more than one year old I'll start a new topic. Is that a good plan?

I can't speak for others, but I don't see anything wrong with resurrecting old threads.