Canadian Doctors Oppose Agriculture Antibiotic Use

Help Support CattleToday:

Oldtimer

Well-known member
Joined
Jan 19, 2004
Messages
3,922
Reaction score
33
Location
Northeast Montana
CMA urges prescription-only antibiotics for agricultural use



Source: Canadian Medical Association (CMA) - August 25, 2011



Antibiotics shouldn't be used in Canada's agricultural sector except by prescription from veterinarians, the nation's doctors say.



Arguing that antibiotic misuse in the agricultural sector is rampant, delegates to the Canadian Medical Association's 144th annual general meeting in St. John's, Newfoundland, adopted a resolution Wednesday urging the implementation of mandatory veterinary prescriptions for all antibiotics used in animals.




The motion was among a raft of sharp rebukes issued by delegates at the gathering. Others include a condemnation of the Conservative government for continuing to block the inclusion of chrysotile asbestos in the Rotterdam Convention, as well as a stern warning to the public to find safer ways to use cell phones so as to minimize the potentially harmful effect that radio frequencies may have on the brain.



The motion to press for introduction of mandatory antibiotic prescriptions in agriculture flies in the face of the federal government's unwillingness to develop a concerted national response to antibiotic misuse in agriculture or to contain antibiotic resistance within medicine. Critics have repeatedly charged that Ottawa's inaction is deliberate, particularly its failure to establish a Canadian Centre for Antimicrobial Resistance after dissolving a national committee (http://www.cmaj.ca/lookup/doi/10.1503/cmaj.109-3109) Ottawa has also failed to tighten off-label drug usage on farms (http://www.cmaj.ca/lookup/doi/10.1503/cmaj.091009). Nor did it act to close a legal loophole allowing massive imports of unapproved drugs for agricultural use (http://www.cmaj.ca/lookup/doi/10.1503/cmaj.090525).



Delegates argued the government's inertia on the file must end.



"Because agriculture accounts for the highest volume of antibiotic use, the farm environment serves as a reservoir of resistant genes," British Columbia delegate Dr. Bill Mackie told council.



"Low concentrations of antibiotics used in animal feed have been found to induce random mutagenesis," while the dispersal of antibiotics into soil and water have been shown to enhance the risk of breaking natural barriers between bacterial groups via "horizontal transfer of genes" conferring resistance to bacteria that may not have even come in direct contact with the antibiotics, he explained.



This has serious health implications for patients, some of whom are dying as a consequence of resistant infections, particularly as the most common antimicrobials used in agriculture are either identical or related to those administered to humans, Mackie said.



During the early 1990s, vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus (VRE) was detected among patients in Europe and a search for a community reservoir of that resistance found VRE in meat and manure on farms where the antimicrobials were used as growth promoters, he explained. Humans exposed to livestock that are colonized with the super bug methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus have also been found to have a 138-fold higher risk of becoming colonized with those bacteria, Mackie said.



Countries such as Denmark that have restricted the use of antimicrobials in agriculture have substantially reduced both antimicrobial consumption and resistance with little economic impact on industry, he argued. Between 1992 and 2008, for example, Danish farmers increased swine production by 47% while halving their use of antibiotics.



Some delegates countered that mandatory prescriptions would indiscriminately raise barriers for Canadian hobby farmers, who are already strictly regulated and make only marginal contributions to the spread of antibiotic resistance, while others questioned whether veterinary prescriptions would be an effective measure of control.



"I believe farming and agricultural processes need to be addressed but I'm not sure this council has a firm knowledge of what those processes are in order to decide on the one and only mechanism by which we have to do that," Alberta delegate Dr. Carolyn Lane explains in an interview. "Veterinarians may just be coerced by their clients to write prescriptions, so I think they and physicians should work together to decide on a way in general that they could address intensive farming practices that have created the need for widespread antibiotic use in agriculture."



more

http://www.cmaj.ca/site/earlyreleases/2 ... -use.xhtml
 
Wow I think that perscription is a step to far.

We need to look to proper management methods that do not rely on the lastest chemical, antibiotic etc as a quick fix, but if an animal is ill it needs the appropriate meds now.

Madatory record keeping and reasoning would be a better tool, and a reduction and/or exclusion of medicated feed.
 
I think they need to look at the physician's before they look at the ag sector. Doctors hand out prescriptions for meds like they are handing out toilet paper . :mad: I have not been on antibiotics since I was very young ,even when I had rheumatic fever in my early 20'3 I recovered through that very painful illness with out any meds . People pop antibiotics like they are candy from a pez dispenser then wonder why they cannot fight off a simple infection
cat-vs-mouse.gif
.

Fricken government control is complete bullshytte here, you know you cannot even get an IV needle from a vet anymore ,they are supposed to come out and do the IV for you. :bang:
 
hillsdown":1hasd4dv said:
I think they need to look at the physician's before they look at the ag sector. Doctors hand out prescriptions for meds like they are handing out toilet paper . :mad: I have not been on antibiotics since I was very young ,even when I had rheumatic fever in my early 20'3 I recovered through that very painful illness with out any meds . People pop antibiotics like they are candy from a pez dispenser then wonder why they cannot fight off a simple infection
cat-vs-mouse.gif
.

Fricken government control is complete bullshytte here, you know you cannot even get an IV needle from a vet anymore ,they are supposed to come out and do the IV for you. :bang:

Yes did not think about that, been a long time since I was at a doctor
 
Vets have been pushing for this down here for years. Just another way to force you to use him AND double the price of the medication.
 
TexasBred":2iyjglra said:
Vets have been pushing for this down here for years. Just another way to force you to use him AND double the price of the medication.


The good lrg animal vets here do not want this TB . They are busy enough as it is and not enough of them . They want us to do as much as we can and learn from them when possible so we can take care of the little stuff and use them for the bigger stuff.
Small animal vets and crappy LA vets, well that is a whole other story :mad:
 
Problem is the use/overuse/abuse of non-therapeutic antibiotics by some- is going to make it tough for everyone else to get Ag antibiotics when they are really needed...

The International medical community has been calling for stricter regulation for years- and lately have been joined by the US CDC, AMA, Union of Concerned Scientists (UCS) and several other medical and scientific groups... USDA has been doing much more testing of carcass's- and finding more violators of misuse (especially amongst dairy cattle) and FDA is now looking into the issue of nontherapeutic feeding/use- and I predict will be forced to put on more regulation...

Personally I like it the way it is- and use "all natural- no antibiotics/hormones" as a value added way of marketing cattle.....
 
We're already prescription only in NZ.
It adds costs to the farmers, takes up the vets time. If I think one of my animals needs a drug that isn't on my 'scrip, I have to call a vet out or go into the clinic and ask to speak to a vet... the receptionists are not allowed to hand anything over or give advice (I think some legal thing came out that receptionists were no longer allowed to give advice regardless of their own vet training). At the beginning of every year I have to make an appointment with the vet to discuss the antibiotic use ahead, there's another appointment made in the autumn specifically to discuss and authorise dry cow therapy.
I would hate to be a small scale farmer and have to comply with these rules. At least with the number of animals and experience I have it's not difficult to predict what the antibiotic needs for the year are likely to be.

We're almost the opposite regarding vet use - I often wish vets would just train up more technicians or allow farmers to handle more meds so that their time isn't taken up on routine vaccinations, preg testing, calf dehorning, weighing youngstock, and all sorts of things that really don't need four or six years university training and a top notch brain.
 
regolith":3lvcc54x said:
We're already prescription only in NZ.
It adds costs to the farmers, takes up the vets time. If I think one of my animals needs a drug that isn't on my 'scrip, I have to call a vet out or go into the clinic and ask to speak to a vet... the receptionists are not allowed to hand anything over or give advice (I think some legal thing came out that receptionists were no longer allowed to give advice regardless of their own vet training). At the beginning of every year I have to make an appointment with the vet to discuss the antibiotic use ahead, there's another appointment made in the autumn specifically to discuss and authorise dry cow therapy.
I would hate to be a small scale farmer and have to comply with these rules. At least with the number of animals and experience I have it's not difficult to predict what the antibiotic needs for the year are likely to be.

We're almost the opposite regarding vet use - I often wish vets would just train up more technicians or allow farmers to handle more meds so that their time isn't taken up on routine vaccinations, preg testing, calf dehorning, weighing youngstock, and all sorts of things that really don't need four or six years university training and a top notch brain.
Same rules apply in my country, leading to more expenses and work. On the other hand I think it helps a great deal against "bugs" getting resistant. Often there is no other cure if a person gets really ill and it is caused by multi resistant bacteria.
 

Latest posts

Top