Brazilian Company Buys US Meat Processors

ETF

Well-known member
Joined
Feb 27, 2007
Messages
194
City & State/Province
North Florida
KANSAS CITY, Mo. -- National Beef Packing Co., the nation's fourth-largest beef processor, said Tuesday it is being acquired by Brazilian giant JBS SA in a cash and stock deal worth $560 million. JBS also said it plans to buy Smithfield Food Inc.'s beef business to form the largest meat processor in the U.S.

The rest here: http://www.foxbusiness.com/markets/...giant-buys-beef-processor-560m_506597_10.html

Any thoughts on this? My initial thought is that consolidation of the packers is going to mean lower prices to the ranchers. Is that anywhere near correct?
 
ETF":1zs77aeo said:
[
Any thoughts on this? My initial thought is that consolidation of the packers is going to mean lower prices to the ranchers. Is that anywhere near correct?

I don't know that there is much competition for cattle now, so I don't see it getting a lot worse. I do worry that this Brazilian company may intend to eventually source most of their meat from their home.
 
They are not only buying up Meat Processors- but they are also buying up feedlots...These purchases will not only make them the largest packer in the world, but also the largest in the country...
We will no longer be the Big 4 in Packers- Now it will be the Big 3 with the largest one owned by a foreign company....

If you control the county's food you control the country...If you control the worlds food you control the world...

Everyone needs to contact their Senators and Congressmen and support the Ban on Packer Ownership of cattle law and M-COOL that are in the current Farm Bill- or it will be only a few years and we will see the end of the family type farm and ranch..It will all be a corporate owned or imported food supply.....

Along with JBS purchasing Smithfield Beef they also purchased Five Rivers Ranch Cattle Feeding LLC.

Taking over Five Rivers also increases JBS's own cattle feeding dramatically. Five Rivers can feed up to 811,000 head of cattle at one time and has operations in Colorado, Idaho, Kansas, Oklahoma and Texas, according to the company's website. For now, Smithfield retains ownership of the current cattle in the feedlots and will sell those to JBS at market prices, according to a Smithfield news release.
 
That's what I was afraid of. We've got friends that used to be in the chicken house business. They got in early and had a good working relationship with the processor and made some money. Processor got sold a couple of times to bigger and bigger companies. The rules got tighter and tighter and their profits started dropping. Then the processor decided that they only wanted to service chicken houses within 10 miles of the plant, long term contracts or not. Our friends were 13 miles from the plant. Things got pretty ugly before our friends were able to sell the houses. They warned the buyer up front, but he was sure he could make it work. Anyway, the bottom line was they basically went from being independent operators to contract employees of the processor with everything being done on the processor's terms. Sounds like that's the way the beef industry is headed.
 
The Brazilian company that bought Swift a while back is the worlds largest beef processor and Swift has nation wide distribution. Brazil with the words largest # of cattle will be free of hoof and mouth soon. Then the doors will open to fresh and frozen beef. Right now they are OK to sell us all kinds of processed beef [and we import LOTS!]

OH YEAH :devil2: they have plans.
 
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases. Product prices and availability are accurate as of the date/time indicated and are subject to change.
I don't know if you remember- but about a year ago Tyson went into partnership with Cactus Feeders and bought a George Soros financed packing and feeding conglomerate in Argentina....Immediately the next day the USDA announced that they were attempting to relax the Foot and Mouth Disease rule against Argentina- and allow cattle/beef from there to be imported... :roll: :(
Luckily so far the US cattle organizations have been able to stop this rule change from going into affect- and further endangering the health of the US cattle herd-- but it won't be long....

Taking over Five Rivers also increases JBS's own cattle feeding dramatically. Five Rivers can feed up to 811,000 head of cattle at one time and has operations in Colorado, Idaho, Kansas, Oklahoma and Texas, according to the company's website.

Can you imagine if you control 30-40% of the slaughter capacity in the country- and then have this many Packer owned cattle- how much you can control the market prices to your benefit anytime you want to...

If we don't stop it now- it will be too late...
 
“Fighting for the U.S. Cattle Producer”



For Immediate Release Contact: Shae Dodson, Communications Coordinator
March 13, 2008 Phone: 406-672-8969; e-mail: [email protected]" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;



Cattle Producers to Department of Justice: Block JBS Purchases



Washington, D.C. – In a letter sent today to the U.S. Department of Justice regarding JBS Acquisitions’ plans to purchase National Beef Packing Co., Smithfield Beef Group, and Five Rivers Ranch Cattle Feeding, R-CALF USA expressed concern that such transactions would cause injury to competition in both the U.S. cattle industry and the U.S. beef industry, which would result in harm to both independent U.S. cattle producers and U.S. consumers.



JBS Acquisitions would become the largest beef packer in the U.S., and R-CALF USA explained that JBS likely would capture over 35 percent of the domestic cattle slaughter – based on evidence that indicates Tyson Foods already controlled that amount of the market in the mid-1990s.



“We urge the U.S. Department of Justice to rigorously investigate the potential impacts of this proposed purchase; to prevent its consummation pending a thorough investigation; and to ultimately block this proposed purchase should evidence be found indicating any reduction in competition to either the U.S. cattle industry or the U.S. beef industry,” wrote R-CALF USA President/Region VI Director Max Thornsberry. “Should this purchase materialize, the market power concentrated in the hands of the remaining three packers…would intensify, as would their propensity to exercise this market power to the detriment of competition, resulting in economic injury to independent U.S. cattle producers and U.S. consumers.”

Evidence already exists that demonstrates the exercise of market power by the current four firms that dominate the beef packing industry. Juries in Pickett v. Tyson Fresh Meats, Inc. and in Herman Schumacher et al. v. Tyson Fresh Meats, Inc. et al. have found, as matters of fact, that the actions of dominant beef packers, even at the current level of concentration, effectively manipulated prices paid to domestic cattle producers. Studies also show that market power can be, and is being, exerted by the dominant beef packers, at current concentration levels.[1]

Equally disturbing are media reports indicating that JBS SA’s Friboi Group (JBSS3.BR) has been cited by the Brazilian Justice Department’s antitrust division for engaging in anti-competitive practices to keep cattle prices low when purchasing for slaughter.[2] The U.S. Department of Justice should independently investigate the circumstances surrounding any such anti-competitive practices alleged against and/or committed by JBS before allowi ng this proposed purchase to proceed.

“Specifically, the department should determine, as a precondition for this sale, whether U.S. laws are adequate, and adequately enforced, to prospectively prevent a recurrence of the kind and type of anti-competitive behavior as was alleged to have been perpetrated by JBS in Brazil,” Thornsberry wrote.

“R-CALF has taken a strong position against these JBS purchases for good reason,” said R-CALF USA Vice President/Region II Director Randy Stevenson. “The Justice Department must make absolutely certain that U.S. laws are adequate – and that there is adequate enforcement of those laws – to ensure U.S. cattle producers and consumers are not subjected to anti-competitive practices.



“Imagine if you will, the day before the purchases are announced, that three buyers from Swift, National and Smithfield meet together to discuss their plans to buy slaughter cattle,” he explained. “If that occurred, those buyers would be in violation of antitrust laws against collusion. If they had such a discussion openly, it would provide the Justice Department with a ‘smoking gun’ with which to prosecute.



“The activities of three buyers of the third, fourth and fifth largest beef processors colluding would most certainly hurt the price of live cattle,” Stevenson continued. “But, on the day after these proposed acquisitions, the same three buyers could discuss their plans without breaking the law. Who among us would expect the outcome on live cattle prices to be any different?”



Note: To view the letter, visit the “Competition Issues” link at http://www.r-calfusa.com, or contact R-CALF USA Communications Coordinator Shae Dodson at the phone number or e-mail address listed above.
 

Latest posts

Back
Top