any opinions on this

Help Support CattleToday:

skyhightree1

Well-known member
Joined
Sep 9, 2009
Messages
20,445
Reaction score
801
Location
Free Rent ,VA
US Carries Out Airstrike Against ISIS in Iraq

The United States carried out an airstrike against ISIS militants in Iraq today, targeting artillery, the Pentagon's press secretary Rear Adm. John Kirby said.

Kirby said two F/A 18 fighter jets dropped 500 pound laser guided bombs on a mobile artillery piece near Erbil, the capital of the Kurdish province. He said the artillery was being "used against Kurdish forces defending Erbil, near U.S. personnel."

The fighter jets that dropped the bombs came from the USS Bush in the Persian Gulf, according to the U.S. Navy.

The strike comes one day after President Obama authorized airstrikes in Iraq if necessary.

Iraq, Syria and ISIS: What It All Means

The Dramatic Gains ISIS Has Made in Iraq

Why Control of a Terrifying Dam in Iraq Is Life or Death for Half Million People

"We intend to stay vigilant, and take action if these terrorist forces threaten our personnel or facilities anywhere in Iraq," Obama said.

Obama said there will be no U.S. troops on the ground.

"I will not allow the United States to be dragged into fighting another war in Iraq. And so even as we support Iraqis, as they take the flight to these terrorists, American combat troops will not be returning to fight in Iraq," Obama said.


AP Photo via AP videoPHOTO: This image made from AP video shows smoke rising from airstrikes targeting Islamic State militants near the Khazer checkpoint outside of the city of Erbil in northern Iraq, Aug. 8, 2014.
It has been nearly three years since U.S. forces left Iraq, three years since Obama announced the war there was over. The last convoy of U.S. soldiers left Iraq in December 2011.

Administration officials believe the Iraqis are best-suited to deal with the threat of ISIS, the Islamic State of Iraq and Syria, over the long term.

"We're laying down a marker here that even though [ISIS] is not penetrating Erbil, just their presence on the periphery, and the potential threat they pose, could lead us to take action if the targets present themselves," an official told ABC News.

U.S. forces are conducting a difficult and dangerous humanitarian mission, with three U.S. Air Force cargo jets escorted by two F-18 fighter jets dropping critical supplies. In a race to stop a catastrophe, thousands of families who fled to the top of a mountain in Sinjar now face a worrisome predicament, battling blistering heat, pleading that there is no water or bread. Nearly 20 children have already died.

They are trapped 3,000 feet up with no escape.

Down below, ISIS terrorists have taken over their homes, warning of a slaughter if they return.

The U.S. aircraft dropped 5,300 gallons of water and 8,000 ready-to-eat meals.
: The US begins a humanitarian airdrop mission in Iraq.
Senior administration officials said air drops and humanitarian aid will continue "as we see need," and the administration expects that need to continue.



The White House believes any action would be consistent with international law, because U.S. input was requested by the Iraqi government. Additionally, the administration believes that the president has the legal authority under the Constitution to act to protect U.S. citizens.

At this point, the United States is not evacuating Americans from Erbil, confident that the consulate is safe, administration officials said.

The Federal Aviation Administration issued a notice today prohibiting U.S. operators from flying in airspace over Iraq "due to the hazardous situation created by the armed conflict."

Last week the FAA restricted flights at or below 30,000 feet.
 
It's probably too little too late.
The Kurds have been our staunch allies for 25 years.
This won't be the 1st time we've let them down and it won't be the last.
Last time we let Saddam gas them, this time we'll let ISIS slowly consume them.
A few air stikes and dropped MRE's won't stop ISIS, and we don't have the stomach to do what it takes to really protect our allies, especially not the ones who are actually in danger.
 
I believe we're in the beginning stages of world war three and have been for a decade. We are running out of chances to avoid it and our leader likes to speak softly but leave the big stick at home. We need a real leader that's willing to hand ISIS their a$$ and make them think twice. When the cats are away the mice play.
 
I'm in agreement on not sending ground forces in at this stage. Pound the crap out of them from the air until they are beat way the he!! back with holes in their lines so big they can't be repaired. Single out the smaller groups and set them on fire. While they are in retreat... oh well, it was a nice dream for a few minutes. Our admin don't have the balls.
 
CottageFarm":dpb573zu said:
It's probably too little too late.
The Kurds have been our staunch allies for 25 years.
This won't be the 1st time we've let them down and it won't be the last.
Last time we let Saddam gas them, this time we'll let ISIS slowly consume them.
A few air stikes and dropped MRE's won't stop ISIS, and we don't have the stomach to do what it takes to really protect our allies, especially not the ones who are actually in danger.
You got it.....votes are more important to BHO than dead bodies of children. Don't think we need to send our soldiers back over there but would love to see the area help by ISIS look like the surface of the moon when it's over.
 
I think Obama went to the smallest picnic he could find to display his fireworks and to show how strong he is. Look, I am doing something, and I am not s c a r e d.
What made him think he needed to move in on this one? What is he accomplishing? Why was he not on vacation for this decision? What about our allies? What about doing something that really counts for our country? He needs to be paying attention to Israel, and stop playing in Iraq's sandbox. Israel is our ally, not Iraq.
 
A couple of things......
1. The used the aircraft off the USS Bush so the libs can later cry "It's Bush's fault!!!"
2.
as they take the flight to these terrorists,
So far, it's the Iraqi army that has taken flight.
 
I think there is more to this than a symbolic use of firepower or global projection of power. No political decision is made without considering every single nuance and political risk or attribute. ;-)
The F/A-18 Superhornets used in the attack were from Navy Strike/Fighter squadron VFA 213. There are 3 other FA 18 squadrons aboard CVN 77 but none of their names had the word "black" in them, so current political correctness dictated that VFA 213's Blacklions got the job. I'm more than a little confident that they are 100% up to the task.

The Pentagon and intel forces could of course used drones to carry out these attacks or even tomahawks from CVN 77's battle group such as the accompanying
USS Truxton (Arliegh Burke Class DD) or USS Philipine Sea--a Ticonderoga Class guided missile cruiser, but the guys down in the bowels of the war rooms were looking at damage control contingencies (the blame game) should the USA shoot down another civilian airliner, or drop bombs on innocent civilians. Hellfire missiles from drones are traceable straight back to 1600 Penn Ave and it's resident, so some layer of publicly perceived insulation was needed. Enter, CVN 77, AKA USS George HW Bush. I can see MSM and the liberal social media's battle cry now should things go south and come from together.
"It's All Bush's Fault!"
 
greybeard":312vochk said:
I think there is more to this than a symbolic use of firepower or global projection of power. No political decision is made without considering every single nuance and political risk or attribute. ;-)
The F/A-18 Superhornets used in the attack were from Navy Strike/Fighter squadron VFA 213. There are 3 other FA 18 squadrons aboard CVN 77 but none of their names had the word "black" in them, so current political correctness dictated that VFA 213's Blacklions got the job. I'm more than a little confident that they are 100% up to the task.

The Pentagon and intel forces could of course used drones to carry out these attacks or even tomahawks from CVN 77's battle group such as the accompanying
USS Truxton (Arliegh Burke Class DD) or USS Philipine Sea--a Ticonderoga Class guided missile cruiser, but the guys down in the bowels of the war rooms were looking at damage control contingencies (the blame game) should the USA shoot down another civilian airliner, or drop bombs on innocent civilians. Hellfire missiles from drones are traceable straight back to 1600 Penn Ave and it's resident, so some layer of publicly perceived insulation was needed. Enter, CVN 77, AKA USS George HW Bush. I can see MSM and the liberal social media's battle cry now should things go south and come from together.
"It's All Bush's Fault!"


They bombed the wrong enemy and target of the United States.
 
Oh yea, I have an opinion but opinions are like elbows - most everyone has at least one (I cleaned it up).

I think the whole middle east should be paved over in glass as in thermo nuclear device.

I had friends who fought in the Kuwait/Iraq skirmish and was horrified by the stories that were told of the Kuwaitis lack of balls to help themselves. Totally spineless!!!! If they could convince the Americans to wipe their butt's they wouldn't do it themselves. Same with the Araqi's. I don't think one single drop of blood from America's young fighting force should be wasted on those ignorant baster….. So that's what I really think.

I also think we have a spineless leader in Washington who is also politically motivated to the point he will do what ever he thinks will keep the socialists in power. He was advised NOT to pull out of Iraq. He did. He was advised not to give a timetable. He did. And the list goes on and on and ….. Well you get the point.
 

Latest posts

Top