MikeC":2asm3wt1 said:Yet one of the major complaints about beef from consumers and retailers is consistency, size of cuts, eating quality. Your mishmash of breeds and crossbreeds pays not attention to that.
IMO, that's one reason beef lost so much market in the past years, the mongoralizing of our cattle herds. We're starting to get that market share back, but I don't see how three, four, five way cross cows are going to help us out.
Surely you jest Frankie. :lol: When one of the more popular breeds can reach only a 13% rate of qualifying for "THEIR OWN" brand of beef, straight out of the feedlots, do you really think that "Going Purebred" is the way to go? :roll:
I think you mean THE MOST POPULAR BREED if you're talking about Angus. There are Angus cattle all over the country meeting the CAB specs at much higher percentages than the 13% from generic black catte.
For one to constantly be preaching "MARC" studies, (that show crossbreds have the ability to reach the target at a higher rate) you are going against their advice now? :lol:
I don't preach MARC. You have me confused with someone else. I think you've posted more MARC links that I have. They do some good work, but they aren't perfect either.
You haven't been paying attention lately either. Yield Grades and Quality Grades are getting WORSE, not better!
Among generic black cattle. Maybe it's those Char breeders chasing low birthweights and marbling. :lol:
Are you seriously doubting the effects of heterosis?
Which effects? We saw an OK State report that said heteroris had little effect on the more heritable traits like feed efficiency and carcass quality.