slick4591
Well-known member
All found not guilty.
slick4591":32iw7wwv said:All found not guilty.
True Grit Farms":1ymv418z said:I don't understand our court system. They were guilty as charged. IMO I can see a reduced sentence or no sentence, but cannot see the not guilty verdict myself?
callmefence":24ghwqj4 said:True Grit Farms":24ghwqj4 said:I don't understand our court system. They were guilty as charged. IMO I can see a reduced sentence or no sentence, but cannot see the not guilty verdict myself?
They where found Not guilty by a jury.
They never really did anything but camp and protest on land owned by the people of the US. I for once applaud our court system. :clap: :clap: :clap:
True Grit Farms":1axbp1a2 said:callmefence":1axbp1a2 said:True Grit Farms":1axbp1a2 said:I don't understand our court system. They were guilty as charged. IMO I can see a reduced sentence or no sentence, but cannot see the not guilty verdict myself?
They where found Not guilty by a jury.
They never really did anything but camp and protest on land owned by the people of the US. I for once applaud our court system. :clap: :clap: :clap:
So you didn't see them carrying guns on a national wildlife refuge? The occupation of the building and the interference with government employees, I can see where maybe they weren't guilty of that, but not really.
In my heart I'm glad they got away with it, but I can't see how they were found not guilty. Our court system is a farce. IMO
slick4591":3l098iu4 said:FOX has picked it up.
True Grit Farms":2naqw874 said:As a legal citizen of the US of A, I feel we have a right to carry anywhere at anytime.
True Grit Farms":1sokssqa said:As a legal citizen of the US of A, I feel we have a right to carry anywhere at anytime. But we also can't pick and choose which laws to inforce. I'm the first to admit that "just because it's the law doesn't mean it's right" So does this mean that a precedent has been set, and we can now legally carry guns anywhere we want? I'm very interested in knowing what methods or statutes of law Bundy used in getting off the gun charge? Because there's no denying that they had guns in a no gun zone. Hopefully the NBA will look into this because this could be a major victory for gun enthusiast.
Seems like a reasonable analysis.Jogeephus":3u25222v said:Sounds like the DA got a little overzealous. He probably could have got guilty verdicts on lesser charges but they were after blood and wanted to make a point and it backfired.