Menu
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Forums
Non-Cattle Specific Topics
Coffee Shop
With stories like this why does someone do meth
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Help Support CattleToday:
Message
<blockquote data-quote="inyati13" data-source="post: 1160272" data-attributes="member: 17767"><p>Larry electons have mass and their properties have been described. I won't bore you with the facts. Look up electron and you will see knowledge of electrons have gone far beyond the theory stage. It would be easy picking for a physist to prove electricity in a courtroom.</p><p></p><p>In regard to eyewitness, it depends on the credibility of the witness. If you can present information attacking the credibility of the witness, an eyewitness is less credible than physical evidence. I can demonstrate this from a personal case I was the key party too. I issued a Cessation Order in 1979 that shut down an elite coal mine in Pike County KY. I had two eyewitness that testified against physical evidence I presented for the defense of the Cessation Order I issued. It was tried in Pikeville, KY before a federal Law Judge as a civil case. We lost. John Williams my counsel appealed it before the board of three federal Judges and they over turned the lower court judge and placed him on probabtion for a miscarriage of justice. They said because of the bias in the eye witnesses, the physical evidence by law should have been used to decide the case. Which gives me an idea for another one of my stories. Chuckie has wanted another one so this one would be a good one.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="inyati13, post: 1160272, member: 17767"] Larry electons have mass and their properties have been described. I won't bore you with the facts. Look up electron and you will see knowledge of electrons have gone far beyond the theory stage. It would be easy picking for a physist to prove electricity in a courtroom. In regard to eyewitness, it depends on the credibility of the witness. If you can present information attacking the credibility of the witness, an eyewitness is less credible than physical evidence. I can demonstrate this from a personal case I was the key party too. I issued a Cessation Order in 1979 that shut down an elite coal mine in Pike County KY. I had two eyewitness that testified against physical evidence I presented for the defense of the Cessation Order I issued. It was tried in Pikeville, KY before a federal Law Judge as a civil case. We lost. John Williams my counsel appealed it before the board of three federal Judges and they over turned the lower court judge and placed him on probabtion for a miscarriage of justice. They said because of the bias in the eye witnesses, the physical evidence by law should have been used to decide the case. Which gives me an idea for another one of my stories. Chuckie has wanted another one so this one would be a good one. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Non-Cattle Specific Topics
Coffee Shop
With stories like this why does someone do meth
Top