rk
Well-known member
Not sure what that means....but some feeds are better with "byproducts" for palatability, protein quality, rate of fermentation, etc.MikeC":3d2m7cuo said:rk":3d2m7cuo said:MikeC":3d2m7cuo said:Crowder, I undserstand what you are saying about the Wal Mart mentality and don't allow my wife to go there.
But........The local feed dealers who are selling Nutrena feeds are getting their a$$es kicked here by a local mill that sells a good quality feed at $50-$60 per ton less than Nutrena.
He uses some by-products, of course, but so does Nutrena and they cover it up by pouring the molasses on and using wheat midd pellets, peanut hull pellets, etc.
Cargill is making a fortune off of the "Hobby" farmers and "Horse" ranches that have 10 acres and 5 horses.
I much prefer a smaller company with personal service. Not many think that way anymore.
What's wrong with "by-products"? Almost everything besides grains is a byproduct of some sort. Good feed value if used properly.
Absolutely nothing wrong with by-products if they are used correctly.
Didn't mean to infer that they are inferior.
But my opinion is......"you can't make Chicken Salad out of Chicken Crap". ;-)
Not wanting to be argumentative, but folks tend to categorically condemn byproducts, when in fact, they add to the quality of some products.