Menu
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Forums
Cattle Boards
Breeds Board
viger
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Help Support CattleToday:
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Anonymous" data-source="post: 4941"><p>polled was just an example, a poor one, because i am not familiar with polled cattle (had one once and so i presume he was heterozigous for the trait, since all the calves came out horned (only had him breed three times).</p><p></p><p>OK, let's use the anti-myostatic gene, generating double muscled cattle. this is a recessive gene in real life. now just replace polled with double muscled, and horned with single muscled, and i will hopefully have proven my point.</p><p></p><p>it's just a sipmle example of how genetics work.</p><p></p><p>And i believe i have stated in the beginning that it was fictive, and definetely not a representation of real-life genotype.</p><p></p><p>it was just a way of proving that backcrossing is never ever equal in probable outcome to F1XF1.</p><p></p><p> <a href="mailto:gynantonyx@lycos.com">gynantonyx@lycos.com</a></p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Anonymous, post: 4941"] polled was just an example, a poor one, because i am not familiar with polled cattle (had one once and so i presume he was heterozigous for the trait, since all the calves came out horned (only had him breed three times). OK, let's use the anti-myostatic gene, generating double muscled cattle. this is a recessive gene in real life. now just replace polled with double muscled, and horned with single muscled, and i will hopefully have proven my point. it's just a sipmle example of how genetics work. And i believe i have stated in the beginning that it was fictive, and definetely not a representation of real-life genotype. it was just a way of proving that backcrossing is never ever equal in probable outcome to F1XF1. [email=gynantonyx@lycos.com]gynantonyx@lycos.com[/email] [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Cattle Boards
Breeds Board
viger
Top