US to accept refugees..............

jltrent

Well-known member
Silver Member
Joined
Aug 25, 2013
Messages
8,174
City & State/Province
Virginia
The U.S. will accept 85,000 refugees from around the world next year, up from 70,000, and that total would rise to 100,000 in 2017, Kerry said at news conference with German Foreign Minister Frank-Walter Steinmeier after they discussed the mass migration of Syrians fleeing their civil war.

I am sure most of these will be Muslims. If we have to have a quota I would rather accept 100,000 more Mexicans a year than what we will be getting. I may not see it as my years are numbered, but this country will implode from within. It is bad for those people in Syria right now, but I would leave their problems across the ocean.

http://www.dailynews.com/general-news/2 ... 00-in-2017
 
I heard a speak talking about the population dynamics in Europe. The Muslim population has a much higher birth rate and by 2030 or so most if not all European countries will be majority Muslim. This influx of refugees will just speed that up. Omar Kaddafi is quoted to have said that they will take over Europe without firing a shot.
 
Dave":16dye7p3 said:
I heard a speak talking about the population dynamics in Europe. The Muslim population has a much higher birth rate and by 2030 or so most if not all European countries will be majority Muslim. This influx of refugees will just speed that up. Omar Kaddafi is quoted to have said that they will take over Europe without firing a shot.
Where are the Crusaders and the Inquisition when you need it??
 
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases. Product prices and availability are accurate as of the date/time indicated and are subject to change.
TexasBred":kq5y69q0 said:
Dave":kq5y69q0 said:
I heard a speak talking about the population dynamics in Europe. The Muslim population has a much higher birth rate and by 2030 or so most if not all European countries will be majority Muslim. This influx of refugees will just speed that up. Omar Kaddafi is quoted to have said that they will take over Europe without firing a shot.
Where are the Crusaders and the Inquisition when you need it??
Need some swine crusaders, like the Spanish used to run the Moores off.
 
Nesikep":12m9bekq said:
TexasBred":12m9bekq said:
Nesikep":12m9bekq said:
BOOOHOOO

Germany is taking 8 times that many
We already take 700,000 a year form other countries. And Canada is taking in 10,000 over the next year. yippeeeeee..

There's a wee bit of a size difference in the two countries
A weee bit of difference in the population as well.
 
Dave":3ryxcyly said:
I heard a speak talking about the population dynamics in Europe. The Muslim population has a much higher birth rate and by 2030 or so most if not all European countries will be majority Muslim. This influx of refugees will just speed that up. Omar Kaddafi is quoted to have said that they will take over Europe without firing a shot.

Well I don't know about Kaddafi but Santa Anna is quoted as saying that about Texas and he was right.
 
It seems no one can answer this question but, if they hate America so much why are they fighting to get in here. The wagon is already full and the mules are tired! The way I see it is this is being perpetuated by a few leaders who want the power of ruling, and the rest are lambs being led to slaughter.
 
bbirder":pam3a6bt said:
It seems no one can answer this question but, if they hate America so much why are they fighting to get in here. The wagon is already full and the mules are tired! The way I see it is this is being perpetuated by a few leaders who want the power of ruling, and the rest are lambs being led to slaughter.

Suggest this may help answer your question: http://www.cnn.com/2015/09/15/middleeas ... index.html
Trying to avoid being murdered and/or held as ISIS sex slaves might be a reason one would become a refugee.

I do understand the concerns but how can we not try to balance those concerns with some compassion and empathy? (We are so incredibly lucky). Yes, the "table" is tight but can we not find room for one or two more? After all, (just about) all of us on here doubtless came from people who were fleeing deprivation, hardship and/or persecution.

For those so inclined: 'Truly I tell you, whatever you did for one of the least of these brothers and sisters of mine, you did for me.' Matthew 25:40. "Whoever oppresses the poor shows contempt for their Maker, but whoever is kind to the needy honors God." Proverbs 14:31.
 
Seriously??? We truly can not take care of what's here already....and you want to import more? No thanks. At some point someone has to wake up and say, "pump the brakes! This is NOT working!" We also must be good stewards of what we have been entrusted with.
 
Some folks don't get it. I think it's time to have pigs as pets instead of dogs. Hopefully the wolves will eat the sheep first.
 
bbirder":iy43xr9m said:
It seems no one can answer this question but, if they hate America so much why are they fighting to get in here. The wagon is already full and the mules are tired! The way I see it is this is being perpetuated by a few leaders who want the power of ruling, and the rest are lambs being led to slaughter.

You need to understand the meaning of the word caliphate, which is basically taking over and occupying land. Instead of of using weapons and waging war to occupy they are doing what they call the Hijrah, which is a migration. If they can get enough to migrate and reproduce at a fast rate they can take over a country without firing a shot. Liberals want to peg this as a humanitarian effort, but Islamist see it as the beginning of another (I think 3 already) caliphate.
 
boondocks":1c4lr0oo said:
bbirder":1c4lr0oo said:
It seems no one can answer this question but, if they hate America so much why are they fighting to get in here. The wagon is already full and the mules are tired! The way I see it is this is being perpetuated by a few leaders who want the power of ruling, and the rest are lambs being led to slaughter.

Suggest this may help answer your question: http://www.cnn.com/2015/09/15/middleeas ... index.html
Trying to avoid being murdered and/or held as ISIS sex slaves might be a reason one would become a refugee.

I do understand the concerns but how can we not try to balance those concerns with some compassion and empathy? (We are so incredibly lucky). Yes, the "table" is tight but can we not find room for one or two more? After all, (just about) all of us on here doubtless came from people who were fleeing deprivation, hardship and/or persecution.

For those so inclined: 'Truly I tell you, whatever you did for one of the least of these brothers and sisters of mine, you did for me.' Matthew 25:40. "Whoever oppresses the poor shows contempt for their Maker, but whoever is kind to the needy honors God." Proverbs 14:31.

Misapplying a few things. Do you support the mixing of church and state? Its something I really doubt you'd defend on many fronts. This post could probably stop right here, but ill illustrate further how this reasoning fails reality.

How is immigration the same as giving to the poor? Is it because you believe that these people will not contribute to our society?

So immigration=giving? If you're going to make that claim, can you show me a citation where the early church desired mass exodus of their needy from poorer locations to the richer? I don't see it. But I see that tithing and giving was provided to the needy in other locations. Maybe these poorer locations should allow missionaries?

Ever heard of give a man a fish, he eats for a day, teach a man to fish, he eats for a lifetime?

What is the difference between their country of origin and the US? How do we fish?

Our culture, our freedoms.

Why must we import the entire world and attempt to feed them? If the world wants our prosperity, why doesn't it export our ways?

At what point are you happy and have we imported enough "brethren" who hate us and our values? Do you think the entire impoverished world can reside within our borders? Is it our country's duty to move every poor soul on this earth here for a free ride? If you cannot answer absolutely yes, your argument is obviously a false argument from the start.

No, most who promote importing refugees from Muslim countries aren't interested in their plight. They're interested in changing our demographics.

The people coming aren't being selected because they love America and want to assimilate. I have no problem with inviting those that wish to assimilate. And I actively give to the poor, which is a completely different topic. The refugee business is an end around requiring assimilation and selecting supporters of sharia/progressivism.

If you spent much time evaluating sharia and its followers, you'd quickly realize, it doesn't jive with our Constitution.

It's a fake narrative for a purposeful goal.

In a succinct statement, this whole deal is not about rising up of refugees, but about invading and reducing America and the rest of the civilized world.

Why aren't they fleeing to Muslim countries? Why almost exclusively to western countries? Please explain.
 
Commercialfarmer":2j26zrgf said:
boondocks":2j26zrgf said:
bbirder":2j26zrgf said:
It seems no one can answer this question but, if they hate America so much why are they fighting to get in here. The wagon is already full and the mules are tired! The way I see it is this is being perpetuated by a few leaders who want the power of ruling, and the rest are lambs being led to slaughter.

Suggest this may help answer your question: http://www.cnn.com/2015/09/15/middleeas ... index.html
Trying to avoid being murdered and/or held as ISIS sex slaves might be a reason one would become a refugee.

I do understand the concerns but how can we not try to balance those concerns with some compassion and empathy? (We are so incredibly lucky). Yes, the "table" is tight but can we not find room for one or two more? After all, (just about) all of us on here doubtless came from people who were fleeing deprivation, hardship and/or persecution.

For those so inclined: 'Truly I tell you, whatever you did for one of the least of these brothers and sisters of mine, you did for me.' Matthew 25:40. "Whoever oppresses the poor shows contempt for their Maker, but whoever is kind to the needy honors God." Proverbs 14:31.

Misapplying a few things. Do you support the mixing of church and state? Its something I really doubt you'd defend on many fronts. This post could probably stop right here, but ill illustrate further how this reasoning fails reality.

How is immigration the same as giving to the poor? Is it because you believe that these people will not contribute to our society?

So immigration=giving? If you're going to make that claim, can you show me a citation where the early church desired mass exodus of their needy from poorer locations to the richer? I don't see it. But I see that tithing and giving was provided to the needy in other locations. Maybe these poorer locations should allow missionaries?

Ever heard of give a man a fish, he eats for a day, teach a man to fish, he eats for a lifetime?

What is the difference between their country of origin and the US? How do we fish?

Our culture, our freedoms.

Why must we import the entire world and attempt to feed them? If the world wants our prosperity, why doesn't it export our ways?

At what point are you happy and have we imported enough "brethren" who hate us and our values? Do you think the entire impoverished world can reside within our borders? Is it our country's duty to move every poor soul on this earth here for a free ride? If you cannot answer absolutely yes, your argument is obviously a false argument from the start.

No, most who promote importing refugees from Muslim countries aren't interested in their plight. They're interested in changing our demographics.

The people coming aren't being selected because they love America and want to assimilate. I have no problem with inviting those that wish to assimilate. And I actively give to the poor, which is a completely different topic. The refugee business is an end around requiring assimilation and selecting supporters of sharia/progressivism.

If you spent much time evaluating sharia and its followers, you'd quickly realize, it doesn't jive with our Constitution.

It's a fake narrative for a purposeful goal.

In a succinct statement, this whole deal is not about rising up of refugees, but about invading and reducing America and the rest of the civilized world.

Why aren't they fleeing to Muslim countries? Why almost exclusively to western countries? Please explain.


Commercial,
I wasn't going to honor him with an answer. Some people are not worth arguing with, because you will never change their way of thinking. :deadhorse:
 
Commercialfarmer":2kh86im7 said:
boondocks":2kh86im7 said:
Trying to avoid being murdered and/or held as ISIS sex slaves might be a reason one would become a refugee.




Commercial farmer wrote the following:

No, most who promote importing refugees from Muslim countries aren't interested in their plight. They're interested in changing our demographics.

The refugee business is an end around requiring assimilation and selecting supporters of sharia/progressivism.


In a succinct statement, this whole deal is not about rising up of refugees, but about invading and reducing America and the rest of the civilized world.

Why aren't they fleeing to Muslim countries? Why almost exclusively to western countries? Please explain.

:nod: :nod:

The majority of these "refugees" are men, not women and girls who are at risk of being sex slaves. Men, early twenties, in-their-prime men.
 
Workinonit Farm":33a7qfru said:
Commercialfarmer":33a7qfru said:
boondocks":33a7qfru said:
Trying to avoid being murdered and/or held as ISIS sex slaves might be a reason one would become a refugee.




Commercial farmer wrote the following:

No, most who promote importing refugees from Muslim countries aren't interested in their plight. They're interested in changing our demographics.

The refugee business is an end around requiring assimilation and selecting supporters of sharia/progressivism.


In a succinct statement, this whole deal is not about rising up of refugees, but about invading and reducing America and the rest of the civilized world.

Why aren't they fleeing to Muslim countries? Why almost exclusively to western countries? Please explain.

:nod: :nod:

The majority of these "refugees" are men, not women and girls who are at risk of being sex slaves. Men, early twenties, in-their-prime men.

Kind of makes you wonder why these able bodied men, aren't fighting to defend the mother land. :?:
 
Nesikep":3b2vd0ya said:
We already take 700,000 a year form other countries. And Canada is taking in 10,000 over the next year. yippeeeeee..

There's a wee bit of a size difference in the two countries[/quote]

Don't just look at the size of the country. Which country is most responsible for causing so many conflicts and resulting refugees?
 

Latest posts

Back
Top