Trouble with Generals....

Tommy Ruyle

Well-known member
Joined
Mar 8, 2005
Messages
1,440
City & State/Province
Medora, Illinois
I don't know why the media is making such a big deal over Bush having trouble with his Generals.

Clinton had trouble with his privates. :shock:
 
Mahoney Pursley Ranch":sw2kosl3 said:
Clinton had no control over his privates. ;-)
Heard on the radio that Clinton is undergoing therapy for his sexual addiction.
Comentator pointed out that it seems you can do anything and if you get caught, just say you are sorry and go to therapy and that makes everything OK.
 
It seems that today everything can be blamed on some sort of mental condition or disease. If there is not currently a disease, they will make one. Then they will give you some pills for it and say your ok. Like Clinton, if you cant keep your pants around your waist instead of around your ankles, they will label that as a disability.

Plus, its not like he can divorce Hillary for someon not so hideous and bi***y, because of their political status. If they cant maintain a family, they wont get votes to maintain a government.
 
Nobody died because Clinton couldn't control his Privates. Bush has plenty of control over his Generals. If he doesn't like what they say, he'll just fire them and find some that says what he wants to hear.
 
Frankie":14ejv940 said:
Nobody died because Clinton couldn't control his Privates. Bush has plenty of control over his Generals. If he doesn't like what they say, he'll just fire them and find some that says what he wants to hear.

I'm no big fan of President Clinton, but this is a valid point.
 

Latest posts

Back
Top