Train wreck....

Jake

Well-known member
Joined
Dec 20, 2003
Messages
3,836
City & State/Province
North Central Kansas
Title: Angus: All it's cut out to be?
Authors: Elizabeth Weise
Source: USA Today; 08/03/2004
Accession Number: J0E385845792104
Persistent link to this record: http://search.epnet.com/login.aspx?dire ... 5845792104
Database: Newspaper Source
* * *

Angus: All it's cut out to be?




It's not always 100% purebred

Section: Life, Pg. 07d

Geneticists are unlocking the secrets of the grocery story, and what they're finding is surprising.

First it was the fish counter, where researchers recently discovered that as much as 77% of all fish sold as red snapper actually wasn't red snapper.

Now it's the meat counter.

Scientists at a Texas company creating genetic tests for individual cattle breeds tested 560 cuts of beef sold as certified Angus and found that between 8% and 50% of the cuts weren't genetically at least 50% Angus.

The Angus breed is considered particularly tasty because its meat is well marbled with fat. Producers have been capitalizing on the Angus name since the 1970s.

Viagen, of Austin, tested beef purchased in Texas, Nebraska, Kansas and Illinois in 2003 and 2004. Four different Angus-branded beef labels were tested. Using two separate tests, the company looked for more than 50% Angus lineage and less than 25% Brahman, a breed associated with increased toughness.

The four brands varied widely in the percentage of samples that fit the Angus profile: 92%, 83%, 71% and 50%. When Viagen tested a non-Angus-branded beef label as a control, they found that 47% of those samples fit the Angus profile.

The findings aren't surprising, says Davey Griffin, a meat specialist at Texas A&M University, because certified Angus beef programs are actually based on hide color, not genetics.

In fact, of more than 30 Angus beef certification programs verified by USDA, only four require actual genetic confirmation. The rest, mostly older programs, are based on visual identification and require only that the animal's hide be 51% black. That's primarily because in the past hide color was the most reliable indicator of breed.

"They don't have to show or prove any Angus background," Griffin says.

The criteria used for the Certified Angus Beef brand, one of the oldest Angus certifications, are focused on quality issues, says a spokesman for the company that oversees the program. They include marbling, degree of muscling relative to fat, and age rather than genetics, says Brent Eichar of Certified Angus Beef LLC.

"We're a breed-influenced program," Eichar says. "We talk about the Angus influence, but we nowhere make claims of it as a pure breed."

But, Eichar says, it's the criteria that determine "what's a good eating experience, whether it's 98% or 56% or 46% Angus."

Griffin agrees that such criteria give the brand its value. But eventually, as tests such as the Viagen one become more common, the actual genetics of an animal may correspond better with the breed listed on the package, he says.

(c) USA TODAY, 2004


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Source: USA Today, AUG 03, 2004
Item: J0E385845792104
 
I'm not trying to start anything, I was just reading articles again and this caught my eye, I'm goin to ask the moderators to lock this one so we don't start a war.
 
Jake":39vteqhr said:
I'm not trying to start anything, I was just reading articles again and this caught my eye, I'm goin to ask the moderators to lock this one so we don't start a war.
Come on, Jake! Let's don't lock it yet. This could be a good debate. We've had it before, anyway. All the CAB haters have to do is copy and paste their previous arguments.

The one thing I found lacking in your article was any mention of the accuracy of the test! Why should we automatically assume the test is accurate without any evidence at all of verification/calibration of the test itself? I'm not disputing the accuracy, only challenging it. If they're trying to prove that a product is not what it claims to be, shouldn't they first document that their test is what it claims to be?
 

Latest posts

Back
Top