snoopdog":av38jctx said:Yeah , we need to shoot everyone who's ancestors weren't here before 1620.
JMJ Farms":13z04jx6 said:I didn't suggest killing unarmed people. I did suggest that, if my classification of it being an invasion, that deadly force would be acceptable.
Red tape makes it too complicated. People overthink it. You don't have to kill them. Warn them. Then maybe some tear gas and rubber bullets. Then just back up a little with a Benelli and some bird shot. Won't take long to get the message across.
I wish I had one that would be acceptable to everyone, I don't think that's possible. What I do think is possible is, opening your mind and realizing that AMERICA does not need a boogeyman to thrive as a country, be it liberals,conservatives, christians, muslims, mexicans the chinese. The list goes on.slick4591":6tsfdume said:snoopdog":6tsfdume said:Yeah , we need to shoot everyone who's ancestors weren't here before 1620.
Lets hear your solution.
And yet you compare the 1776 bill of rights to the issues of today ,correct?Hook2.0":2qz6gkss said:Because the issues of 1620 are the same as the issues now?snoopdog":2qz6gkss said:Yeah , we need to shoot everyone who's ancestors weren't here before 1620.
Laughable.