Menu
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Forums
Cattle Boards
Breeds Board
Some of Greenwillow's Cattle
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Help Support CattleToday:
Message
<blockquote data-quote="HerefordSire" data-source="post: 573421" data-attributes="member: 4437"><p>"We predict the intake based on how big the animal is and how fast the animal grew," Carstens explains. "So an animal that eats less than predicted will have a negative (in this case that is good) net feed intake or improved net feed efficiency. An animal that eats more than predicted would have a positive net feed intake or poor net feed efficiency. Obviously the animals we are trying to identify and propagate through selection are those animals that eat less than predicted.</p><p></p><p>"The value in looking at net feed intake as an alternative measure of feed efficiency is that we can account for feed requirements for maintenance and growth with this trait," Carstens adds. "Australian research has shown that net feed intake is moderately heritable and is independent of the animal's growth rate."</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Preliminary results to date</p><p></p><p>While most of the data for this project are still being analyzed, one thing is clear: These animals with so much in common definitely have differences in terms of net feed intake and efficiency.</p><p></p><p>Steers in the low NFI group (meaning more efficient), ate 17 percent less feed than the high NFI group, even though their growth was similar. In terms of profitability, that's a significant difference. Carstens explains, "If we use a ration cost of $120 a ton, and … if efficiency could be improved by 10 percent, through selection, we can save about $25 per animal in feed costs to put 600 pounds of gain on a feedlot steer."</p><p></p><p>Why are some animals able to maintain themselves with relatively less feed intake? </p><p></p><p>"Other research suggests the reason the low NFI cattle consume less feed, though they weigh the same and gain the same, is that the low NFI animals have lower maintenance energy requirements," Carstens explains. "One of the questions we're trying to ask, beyond the physiological indicators, is do these animals have lower maintenance energy requirements?</p><p></p><p>"Roughly, if we break it down and look at a cow herd from conception to weaning," he says, "looking at the total energy required on an annual basis, about 70 percent of the total feed energy that goes into that cow herd to produce weaned calves is going toward cow maintenance. It's big chunk.</p><p></p><p>"The key is can we do it without impairing the cow's productivity?" he asks. "This is why we need to conduct more research to make sure that two or three generations down the road we don't end up with cattle that reproduce less efficiently or produce tougher carcasses."</p><p></p><p><a href="http://www.texascattleraisers.org/issues/2003/0503/newMeasure.asp" target="_blank">http://www.texascattleraisers.org/issue ... easure.asp</a></p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="HerefordSire, post: 573421, member: 4437"] "We predict the intake based on how big the animal is and how fast the animal grew," Carstens explains. "So an animal that eats less than predicted will have a negative (in this case that is good) net feed intake or improved net feed efficiency. An animal that eats more than predicted would have a positive net feed intake or poor net feed efficiency. Obviously the animals we are trying to identify and propagate through selection are those animals that eat less than predicted. "The value in looking at net feed intake as an alternative measure of feed efficiency is that we can account for feed requirements for maintenance and growth with this trait," Carstens adds. "Australian research has shown that net feed intake is moderately heritable and is independent of the animal’s growth rate." Preliminary results to date While most of the data for this project are still being analyzed, one thing is clear: These animals with so much in common definitely have differences in terms of net feed intake and efficiency. Steers in the low NFI group (meaning more efficient), ate 17 percent less feed than the high NFI group, even though their growth was similar. In terms of profitability, that’s a significant difference. Carstens explains, "If we use a ration cost of $120 a ton, and … if efficiency could be improved by 10 percent, through selection, we can save about $25 per animal in feed costs to put 600 pounds of gain on a feedlot steer." Why are some animals able to maintain themselves with relatively less feed intake? "Other research suggests the reason the low NFI cattle consume less feed, though they weigh the same and gain the same, is that the low NFI animals have lower maintenance energy requirements," Carstens explains. "One of the questions we’re trying to ask, beyond the physiological indicators, is do these animals have lower maintenance energy requirements? "Roughly, if we break it down and look at a cow herd from conception to weaning," he says, "looking at the total energy required on an annual basis, about 70 percent of the total feed energy that goes into that cow herd to produce weaned calves is going toward cow maintenance. It’s big chunk. "The key is can we do it without impairing the cow’s productivity?" he asks. "This is why we need to conduct more research to make sure that two or three generations down the road we don’t end up with cattle that reproduce less efficiently or produce tougher carcasses." [url=http://www.texascattleraisers.org/issues/2003/0503/newMeasure.asp]http://www.texascattleraisers.org/issue ... easure.asp[/url] [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Cattle Boards
Breeds Board
Some of Greenwillow's Cattle
Top