Rule 2

Help Support CattleToday:

PeaceCountryCowboy":3vequpsz said:
Oldtimer":3vequpsz said:
Just because you have one rattlesnake living under your porch that you can't get rid of doesn't mean that you should just go out and haul in a dozen more!!!

Doesn't mean it's still not under there potentially producing more. Might as well work with your neighbour where it came from to get rid of all of them rather then just sealing up and hoping for the best.

I'll give you an example, if your neighbour has a weedy field and you have a field right next to him with a few weeds. Do you build a giant net between the two fields to stop the weed seeds from blowing onto your field that already has started growing weeds or work with him to spray both fields for the weeds at the same time?

Are you now saying BSE blows in the wind :???: Or have you been toking too much Mad Cow prevention ;-) :lol:

You still haven't answered my question as to what your employment plans are when the first native origin case of vCJD shows up in North America???
 
PeaceCountryCowboy":2chhpic5 said:
Oldtimer":2chhpic5 said:
Just because you have one rattlesnake living under your porch that you can't get rid of doesn't mean that you should just go out and haul in a dozen more!!!

Doesn't mean it's still not under there potentially producing more. Might as well work with your neighbour where it came from to get rid of all of them rather then just sealing up and hoping for the best.

I'll give you an example, if your neighbour has a weedy field and you have a field right next to him with a few weeds. Do you build a giant net between the two fields to stop the weed seeds from blowing onto your field that already has started growing weeds or work with him to spray both fields for the weeds at the same time?

I will give you an example...........
#1 you have a neighbor that has a herd 1/10 the size of yours that has 10 times as many diseased cattle as you.
#2 That has acted irresponsibly and has done great economic harm to the cattle industry,by refusing to maintain an effective feeding program.
#3 A neighbor that has for many years partnered with packers ,creating captive supplies,that has been proven to depress your market.
#4 A neighbor that has been a willing participant in allowing his packer partners to pass his product off as a product of the USA,by having little to no interest in demanding the maple leaf follow his product to the meat case.
Would you work with a neighbor like this ????
good luck
 
Oldtimer":2v62lj1l said:
Are you now saying BSE blows in the wind :???: Or have you been toking too much Mad Cow prevention ;-) :lol:

You still haven't answered my question as to what your employment plans are when the first native origin case of vCJD shows up in North America???

Well you started it by saying it's like a rattlesnake under your porch :lol: .

To answer your question, I'll be working with cattle. There were 29 cases of vCJD in Britian I believe plus hoof and mouth and they still have cattle ;-) .
 
Here is another example
Say your neighbor depends on you for oil, natural gas, electricity,etc. and bad mouths you every chance he gets about how everything thats wrong in his life is your fault.
After a while your going to think about doing business with your other neigbors instead of him.
Some of you are your own worst enemy sometimes.
 
Horse Guy":efvwfpav said:
Here is another example
Say your neighbor depends on you for oil, natural gas, electricity,etc. and bad mouths you every chance he gets about how everything thats wrong in his life is your fault.
After a while your going to think about doing business with your other neigbors instead of him.
Some of you are your own worst enemy sometimes.

And for those of you who do not know OR FYI:Alberta province, in western Canada, sits atop an estimated 175 billion barrels of oil, ranking second behind Saudi Arabia in petroleum reserves.

http://afp.google.com/article/ALeqM5h8a ... vALq7E6yyQ

Keep poking the bear. ;-)
 
hillsdown":1sr6kncf said:
Horse Guy":1sr6kncf said:
Here is another example
Say your neighbor depends on you for oil, natural gas, electricity,etc. and bad mouths you every chance he gets about how everything thats wrong in his life is your fault.
After a while your going to think about doing business with your other neigbors instead of him.
Some of you are your own worst enemy sometimes.

And for those of you who do not know OR FYI:Alberta province, in western Canada, sits atop an estimated 175 billion barrels of oil, ranking second behind Saudi Arabia in petroleum reserves.

http://afp.google.com/article/ALeqM5h8a ... vALq7E6yyQ

Keep poking the bear. ;-)

That ain't yours any more--back there when Canada signed that NAFTA piece of paper--they gave up the major amount of their resources to the US-- in fact Canada by that piece of paper will have to buy natural gas in case of a shortage while obligated to give the majority of Canada's to the US...

And if you don't--remember--GW's in an empire building mold....If he wants it he'll take it....Cheney's oil companies are needing a few billion $ more profits....
Yep by 2012--Canada will have the Amero for currency- and the maple leaf will be history.... ;-) :lol:
 
Oldtimer":bigae5ho said:
Yep by 2012--Canada will have the Amero for currency- and the maple leaf will be history.... ;-) :lol:

Couple more days of the Canadian dollar going up and we won't want your worth less currancy :lol: .
 
PeaceCountryCowboy":wvc2wogm said:
Oldtimer":wvc2wogm said:
That ain't yours any more--back there when Canada signed that NAFTA piece of paper

:lol: Now you're defending NAFTA? Or is that only when it comes to oil and gas? ;-)

I ain't defending it--I think its funny that Canadians think it is so great--when they've almost sold out all control over their natural resources and sovereignty with it--and continue to loose more daily....

The thing is that what most Canadians don't know is that the US could drop out or change NAFTA anytime they want to-- as Clinton was never able to get treaty acceptance of it......

Under United States law it is classed as a congressional-executive agreement rather than a treaty, reflecting a peculiar sense of the term "treaty" in United States constitutional law that is not followed by international law or the laws of other nations....

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/North_Amer ... _Agreement

And Senators and Congressmen got reminded of this prior to their voting down allowing Mexican trucks in the US...

WND reported last week Cornyn's offer of a side-by-side amendment to defeat an amendment by Sen. Byron Dorgan, D-N.D., to remove funding from the Fiscal Year 2008 Department of Transportation appropriations bill for the department's trucking demonstration project to allow Mexican trucks on U.S. highways.

During the debate, Cornyn offered a mistaken argument from the Senate floor that the U.S. had a "treaty obligation" under the North American Free Trade Act to allow Mexican trucks into the U.S.

The Senate never passed NAFTA as a treaty. Lacking the two-thirds vote needed for passage of a treaty in the Senate, President Clinton submitted NAFTA to Congress as a law.

http://www.worldnetdaily.com/news/artic ... E_ID=57672

And bad laws can be altered or removed with just the passage of another law...NAFTA is a bad law that hasn't worked- and the American public is becoming very much more aware of that....



Government-managed trade, not free trade
Milton Friedman (Nobel Prize winning economist and former Nixon and Reagan advisor) has argued that the North American Free Trade Agreement is actually not a "free trade" agreement, but rather is government managed trade. The essence of this criticism is that such trade agreements don't promote free trade, they inhibit it by implementing another level of bureaucracy on top of national governments. This can not only have a detrimental effect on trade, it results in an erosion of sovereignty for all nations involved and causes citizens and governments to be bound by decisions made by an unelected international body.
 

Latest posts

Top