Menu
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Forums
Non-Cattle Specific Topics
Every Thing Else Board
rebreeding
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Help Support CattleToday:
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Anonymous" data-source="post: 2559"><p>> Congratulations. You had a very</p><p>> good year A.I.ing. 89% is</p><p>> outstanding!</p><p></p><p>Considering that this was my first year doing it, I think it worked out real well -- I told Dad not to expect more than 50% since we were only able to breed once daily.</p><p></p><p>> I would be interested in seeing</p><p>> any study that compared first</p><p>> service conception between A.I.</p><p>> and natural breeding under the</p><p>> same conditions and showed a</p><p>> higher rate for A.I. over natural</p><p>> breeding, as I have never seen</p><p>> that before, ever.</p><p></p><p>That's according to KABSU (Kansas Artificial Breeding Services Unit), they're a part of Kansas State University, where I took the AI class. It was taught as fact in the class.</p><p></p><p>> Still, regardless of conception</p><p>> rates, there can be no argument</p><p>> that using natural service is</p><p>> EASIER than using A.I. breeding.</p><p></p><p>Gotta agree there -- much easier to open a gate and let the old bull in, but we need replacement heifers and aren't ready to replace the old bull, so hopefully the bulls we AI'd to will give us some good heifers.</p><p></p><p>Ann B</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p> <a href="mailto:Bledsoes_Bunnies@msn.com">Bledsoes_Bunnies@msn.com</a></p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Anonymous, post: 2559"] > Congratulations. You had a very > good year A.I.ing. 89% is > outstanding! Considering that this was my first year doing it, I think it worked out real well -- I told Dad not to expect more than 50% since we were only able to breed once daily. > I would be interested in seeing > any study that compared first > service conception between A.I. > and natural breeding under the > same conditions and showed a > higher rate for A.I. over natural > breeding, as I have never seen > that before, ever. That's according to KABSU (Kansas Artificial Breeding Services Unit), they're a part of Kansas State University, where I took the AI class. It was taught as fact in the class. > Still, regardless of conception > rates, there can be no argument > that using natural service is > EASIER than using A.I. breeding. Gotta agree there -- much easier to open a gate and let the old bull in, but we need replacement heifers and aren't ready to replace the old bull, so hopefully the bulls we AI'd to will give us some good heifers. Ann B [email=Bledsoes_Bunnies@msn.com]Bledsoes_Bunnies@msn.com[/email] [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Non-Cattle Specific Topics
Every Thing Else Board
rebreeding
Top