Quality Grades Continue Down.......

MikeC

Well-known member
Joined
Apr 11, 2005
Messages
7,636
City & State/Province
Alabama
Quality grades continue downward trend

By Donna Farris, For Lee Agri-Media
Thursday, December 7, 2006 1:36 PM CST

A gradual trend of declining marbling levels in beef has become more dramatic in the past 18 months, and a session during the South Dakota Cattlemen's Association Convention will delve into why and what can be done about it.

“Marbling, because of its relationship to flavor in beef, is very important,” said Larry Corah, vice president of Certified Angus Beef. “Unfortunately, we've seen a decline in marbling levels over the past 25 years, which has been particularly accentuated in the last 18 months.”

While the exact cause for the decline in marbling and quality is unknown, there are a number of changes in the cattle industry that could be contributing factors.

One is an increase in the incidence of health problems at the feedlot level.


“When health problems occur, quality grades are dramatically impacted,” Corah said.

The increased use of ethanol byproducts, which are low in starch, could also be playing a role.

Another possibility could be the restructuring of the feed industry toward larger feedlots.

“Our data shows that larger feedlots, for a variety of reasons, have lower quality than smaller feeder types,” Corah said.

Production systems that focus on weight are often detrimental to quality, Corah said.

And, in building up their herds, today's feeders are keeping more heifers back for replacements, yet heifers outgrade steers in meat quality.

Corah said there are a number of management strategies that can help reverse the downward trend in quality concerning things like production systems, average daily gain, implants and health programs.

As the use of ethanol byproducts expands, researchers are looking into how high a level of distillers grains can be added to cattle diets before there are negative impacts, both for cattle and the environment. Feeding studies are under way at South Dakota State University, the University of Nebraska-Lincoln and other institutions, Corah said.

Genetics also play a major role in beef quality, and that starts at the cow/calf level. Through genetic selection, producers can impact quality grades.
“Marbling is a highly inheritable trait,” Corah said.

Overall, a number of today's cattle are fatter but with lower quality beef.

“What this has done is to create a huge demand for higher-quality products,” Corah said, which is favorable for the region.

“(This region's) calves traditionally tend to be some of the very best cattle produced. So these trends have positive economic benefits for (the region) and particularly for those who can hit the quality targets,” he said.

**************************************

What's wrong with this picture? I thought the growing demand and use of Angus bulls would pull us out of this depression?
 
Seems Corah wants to put the blame everywhere but where it belongs. It's a health problem or feeding ethanol by-products, or maybe it's bigger feedlots, or it might be production systems focusing on wt. or I just wonder if it could be the genetics that everybody has switched to in the last 25 yrs? Nah, it could'nt be that. Could it? My question is tho, how many posts before this thread is blocked? :D
 
Roadapple":25h5xl07 said:
Seems Corah wants to put the blame everywhere but where it belongs. It's a health problem or feeding ethanol by-products, or maybe it's bigger feedlots, or it might be production systems focusing on wt. or I just wonder if it could be the genetics that everybody has switched to in the last 25 yrs? Nah, it could'nt be that. Could it? My question is tho, how many posts before this thread is blocked? :D

:lol: :lol: :lol:
 
I think instead of constantly throwing it back to the cow/calf producer the feedlots should be looking more into the grains they now feed.... implants they use....

My beef I put in my freezer is fed ground corn before being butchered, yet it tastes so much better than that in the store. How is it that I can get a better tasting beef when the feedlots have all this expertise??
 
One reason why it tastes beeter at home is due to the aging process. We age ours 2 weeks where the grocery stores are not. That is where a high % of your flavor comes from.

Another reason why the quality grades are lower than they used to be is because they never used to grade the carcasses that did not make choice. Now nearly everything gets graded.
 
i can see some truth in the ethanol byproduct argument. we feed soyhulls to our bulls for an on farm test that is nearly as high in energy as corn, but much lower in starches. our actual IMF % is lower than most would expect from bulls in their condition. others who feed corn-based rations have considerably higher actual IMF% with relatively the same genetics.
 
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases. Product prices and availability are accurate as of the date/time indicated and are subject to change.
We've had calves fed at several different feedlots that have had common genetics. I don;t know the ration they feed but there are acouple that the calves will generally quality grade better then at some ofthe others. With the same genetics you would expect more similar results, at least I would.

dun
 
I read an article recently that said small feedlots can produce higher quality beef than the larger feedlots. I feel a lot of the smaller feedlots are run by cattlemen that care not only about the pounds of beef the produce, but also the quality. Large feedlots are concerned strictly with pounds of beef produced.

Genetics may play into it, but it depends who you talk too. I don't think that your feedstocks are going to play too much of a roll in the quality of your beef, but I haven't researched that enough to takes sides.

Bobg
 
Badlands":pho32pc5 said:
Too much growth and mature size in Angus.

Too much straight breeding.

Badlands

I somewhat disagree on the Angus:

Not enough muscle would be my first thought.
Too much fat is my second.

There are some Char breeders doing the same thing to their calves trying to get some of the "Coarseness" out of them and trying to make them "Smooth".


Let there be muscle!
 
I agree Mike, "Let their be Muscle!!!" You can have both, good pasture cows and good muscle. I know because we have both in our cows. This year our sale bulls averaged 1.15 square inches of REA /cwt and our cows work for us, without any pampering at all. The industry needs muscle to make meat. I have no use the noassatall disease.
 
Cattle don't gain muscle without exercise. Feedlot cattle don't get exercise walking 30 feet from a water tank to a feed bunk.
Pasture finished cattle take longer but finish with more muscle and less fat. It all boils down to the dollar. Time is money to the feedlot. The feedlots keep shoving cattle enough slop and in a few years time you won't be able to taste the difference between pork and beef. Bigger and faster ain't always better.
 
Take a look at the Veal industry. A calf is raised in a crate where it can't even turn around. No muscle. I see a big difference in calves that go on feed at 180 days compared to calves that are not weaned untill 305 days.
 
Good topic. My animal science textbooks mention genetics, inputs, hormones and environment as the three things that influence quality prior to hanging. By hormones, I am not specifically referring to implants, but referrring to high estrogen levels in heifers, testosterone in bulls, etc. I feed a few out and have 4-H kids that feeed a lot more of mine out, and the results to vary.

That said, pasture feeding calm steers to 400 days, followed by 90-120 days of rolled corn w/ a little high quality hay and a gradual decrease in pasture, followed by 21 days of dry aging and a decent butcher does wonders.
 
Despite the recent increase in the percentage of fed cattle grading Choice or better into the 54-56 percent range on a weekly basis, the weekly spread between Choice and Select wholesale beef cutout values again exceeds both last year and the 5-year average spreads. Cumulative total red meat production is almost 4 percent greater than it was at this time last year, with beef leading the pack at almost 6 percent over year-earlier production. Consequently, November 2006 wholesale cutout values for Choice beef declined 3.5 percent below November 2005 levels, while Select prices declined by almost 5 percent.

http://www.cattlenetwork.com/content.as ... ntid=91750
 

Latest posts

Back
Top