Menu
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Forums
Non-Cattle Specific Topics
Coffee Shop
Public Service Info: Additional Vetting for Refugees
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Help Support CattleToday:
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Commercialfarmer" data-source="post: 1291936" data-attributes="member: 14544"><p>SJB, I know individuals that went to work for the FBI, and another that works for one of the other alphabet soup agencies.</p><p></p><p>The one of the two fbi agents that I believe to be the most moral/stand up character quit within the first year because of conflict of conscience. The other FBI agent, I haven't spoken with since she went in. </p><p></p><p>The third in another agency, I talk with regularly. He isn't impressed with his situation either, and he's climbed several rungs of the ladder. </p><p></p><p>That's troubling to me when two eagle scout, heart of the nation, apple pie eating country boys feel that their agencies are not working for the best interest of Americans. </p><p></p><p>If you think that pressure can't be applied to government employees, apparently you haven't been watching Gitmo being emptied in record fashion. Do you feel a these combatants that we spent a lot of lives and years rounding up were all unjustly detained and harmless? Isn't there a .gov committee signing their names on fancy dotted lines paper saying these people have been found to not be a threat to America? Who was right, the ones signing the dotted lines to detain them, or the ones signing the dotted lines under pressure to release them because there is a political objective of closing the place down? </p><p></p><p>I don't care what color ink and how pretty the paper, if you think someone putting their John Hancock on it under duress of unemployment is safety, you're sorely mistaken.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Commercialfarmer, post: 1291936, member: 14544"] SJB, I know individuals that went to work for the FBI, and another that works for one of the other alphabet soup agencies. The one of the two fbi agents that I believe to be the most moral/stand up character quit within the first year because of conflict of conscience. The other FBI agent, I haven't spoken with since she went in. The third in another agency, I talk with regularly. He isn't impressed with his situation either, and he's climbed several rungs of the ladder. That's troubling to me when two eagle scout, heart of the nation, apple pie eating country boys feel that their agencies are not working for the best interest of Americans. If you think that pressure can't be applied to government employees, apparently you haven't been watching Gitmo being emptied in record fashion. Do you feel a these combatants that we spent a lot of lives and years rounding up were all unjustly detained and harmless? Isn't there a .gov committee signing their names on fancy dotted lines paper saying these people have been found to not be a threat to America? Who was right, the ones signing the dotted lines to detain them, or the ones signing the dotted lines under pressure to release them because there is a political objective of closing the place down? I don't care what color ink and how pretty the paper, if you think someone putting their John Hancock on it under duress of unemployment is safety, you're sorely mistaken. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Non-Cattle Specific Topics
Coffee Shop
Public Service Info: Additional Vetting for Refugees
Top