That is a good question. I think the answer is more personal than economic. On a personal level, I take a lot of pride in being a good keeper of my animals. I treat my cows the same way I treat my dog. I take their well being as my responsibility which is not always guided by profit or what it will cost. I am fortunate that I do not rely on my cows to pay my way. If I did, my view on the circumstances would be very different. Nevertheless, I don't want to carelessly lose money. My immediate goal was to improve the health of the cow. She was stressed by the pressure and pain of the infected mammary glands. She would lift her foot and kick down as if she were being bothered by my dog (young blue healer who loves to nip the cows). I was aware that this problem was chronic and knowing I would be revisited by it in the future, I decided to cull her. As mentioned, she is tired of the handling facility which has only made matters worse. It came down to deciding to give her some treatment before she was sent to market. I also thought it might make her more marketable if she did not go to sale with a bad case of mastitis. I will need to hold her for 28 days because of the LA 200 injections. I am feeding her alone both hay and some feed. I would like to see her leave healthy. It is not about economics. I would not want to keep animals, if I could not take care of them as I on a personal level believe I should.