Menu
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Forums
Non-Cattle Specific Topics
Coffee Shop
Prime Act
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Help Support CattleToday:
Message
<blockquote data-quote="CottageFarm" data-source="post: 1588777" data-attributes="member: 16552"><p>No, TT, it is not a well reasoned response, though it is certainly well thought out. They are doing precisely what the claim they are not...which is protecting the large packers/processors. They are using their food safety rationale as a scare tactic, hoping that no one will use any critical thinking skills to see past the smoke screen.</p><p></p><p>1. They assume the premise that the Several States are somehow incapable and unable to establish their own safety and inspection laws that would essentially equate to the same level as federal requirements. Really....??? :bs: </p><p>2. All those small processors they claim to be protecting... A large percentage of small processors only have federal inspectors out of regulatory necessity and it costs them, and their customers, a boatload of money to do it. (will this bill) They will be able to revert to whatever their given state requirements will be if they are only selling within their states limits.</p><p>3. Any companies wishing to sell their products across state lines, will still be required to have federal inspections.</p><p></p><p>God forbid the citizenry should be able to wrench away any small measure of control over our lives and livlihoods, imposed by both federal regulations and large corporations.... :roll:</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="CottageFarm, post: 1588777, member: 16552"] No, TT, it is not a well reasoned response, though it is certainly well thought out. They are doing precisely what the claim they are not...which is protecting the large packers/processors. They are using their food safety rationale as a scare tactic, hoping that no one will use any critical thinking skills to see past the smoke screen. 1. They assume the premise that the Several States are somehow incapable and unable to establish their own safety and inspection laws that would essentially equate to the same level as federal requirements. Really....??? :bs: 2. All those small processors they claim to be protecting... A large percentage of small processors only have federal inspectors out of regulatory necessity and it costs them, and their customers, a boatload of money to do it. (will this bill) They will be able to revert to whatever their given state requirements will be if they are only selling within their states limits. 3. Any companies wishing to sell their products across state lines, will still be required to have federal inspections. God forbid the citizenry should be able to wrench away any small measure of control over our lives and livlihoods, imposed by both federal regulations and large corporations.... :roll: [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Non-Cattle Specific Topics
Coffee Shop
Prime Act
Top