Menu
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Forums
Non-Cattle Specific Topics
Coffee Shop
Political Cows
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Help Support CattleToday:
Message
<blockquote data-quote="monkeywerkz" data-source="post: 39768" data-attributes="member: 28"><p>Just because we have the ability to do something doesn't mean it should be legal. We have the ability to take drugs, but should that be legal? Doesn't pornography have the potential to do as much harm to families as drugs do to an individual? We have the ability to physicaly abuse people, but does that mean it should be legal?</p><p></p><p>There are many things which are, unfortunately, perfectly legal and yet have the potential to cause great harm. Pornography is one of them. I do not believe that the founding fathers of our great country would have given pornography any rights in the constitution. And had the forseen the plague of pornography they may have changed their wording in the first amendment.</p><p></p><p>But, this is a cattle board, isn't it? Sometimes I wonder if there is too much political discussion on this board. I value the insights from the many old timers on the cattle-related forums.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="monkeywerkz, post: 39768, member: 28"] Just because we have the ability to do something doesn't mean it should be legal. We have the ability to take drugs, but should that be legal? Doesn't pornography have the potential to do as much harm to families as drugs do to an individual? We have the ability to physicaly abuse people, but does that mean it should be legal? There are many things which are, unfortunately, perfectly legal and yet have the potential to cause great harm. Pornography is one of them. I do not believe that the founding fathers of our great country would have given pornography any rights in the constitution. And had the forseen the plague of pornography they may have changed their wording in the first amendment. But, this is a cattle board, isn't it? Sometimes I wonder if there is too much political discussion on this board. I value the insights from the many old timers on the cattle-related forums. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Non-Cattle Specific Topics
Coffee Shop
Political Cows
Top