I was looking for specific items that Savory recommends that you find unworkable. To start I struggle to understand where HPG differs from MIG or rational grazing. They both appear to favor high density and a distributed stockpile. HPG is so vague and includes concepts like social impact, which to me is outside the scope of discussion. HPG appears to target so-called brittle areas that receive little rainfall. The question boils down to this - does moving cattle (not continuous grazing) in arid environments have a positive impact on plant cover and quality of forage? Its not an environment that I operate in, except that seems to be the case for the last few years unfortunately.
Savory also operates on a much different plane than I do and likely most everyone else on this forum. I work a decent job, farm, have a family and keep to a small circle of friends. I don't have a lot of money or connections, don't engage with media, and have no connection to British aristocracy. He seems quite foreign to me. I do go to various pasture walks as I like visiting farms. There are a number of types of people there: extension agents, conservation agents, environmentalists, and farmers. Farmers are usually the minority. Its plainly obvious who has money and who doesn't based on the car they drive and clothes they wear. When I first started attending I wondered who those "other" people were, and didn't realize what the game was. A farmer can supplement their income very nicely with environmental practices, and locally there is now pushback from cattle farming into crops or re-wilding. The biggest fish are the wealthy land-owners who rent out land, the loser being the farmer. So perhaps there is some virtue to Savory in convincing rich people that their land shouldn't revert to some game park or such.
All that aside Mark, I want to question why you appear to have such a visceral reaction to the ideas Savory promotes. I can understand debating ideas that he promotes. I can understand a distaste for those of differing politics. And I can certainly understand the argument that he is promoting himself more than his ideas. Nonetheless he does advocate for animal agriculture and for using cattle to graze and to graze in very marginal environments. You pulled out a reference from the Sierra Club, who are ignorant about farming and advocate for "personal dietary choices that minimize or eliminate meat and animal products" (
https://www.sierraclub.org/policy/agriculture/food). I found that surprising.