Menu
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Forums
Non-Cattle Specific Topics
Sports, Hunting, Fishing & Wildlife
No charges
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Help Support CattleToday:
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Dega Moo" data-source="post: 1082146" data-attributes="member: 19930"><p>M5 - I could be mistaken but I recall reading that the second DNA sample resulted from sex with her boyfriend previously in the week and not from intercourse with her boyfriend that same night after intercourse with Winston. So your contention surprised me, sort of. The sole support for your contention she's a slut appears to be that she slept or had intercourse with two men on the same night. If it is correct that she didn't sleep with 2 men on the same night, while it may or may not mean she's not a slut, would seem to eliminate any support for the basis of your contention. Can you support - cite the DA document - where it's publicly available that states she slept or had sex with two men on the same night? </p><p></p><p>The reason I said above ...surprised me, sort of .... is that like you initially I thought the state was saying she had intercourse with 2 men the same night. They really allowed that thought to hang out there, maybe even encouraged the perception and that really would have most of us thinking less than kind thoughts about this woman. But later I picked up on this statement that the non Winston DNA they found in her panties was from intercourse with a boyfriend earlier in the week.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Dega Moo, post: 1082146, member: 19930"] M5 - I could be mistaken but I recall reading that the second DNA sample resulted from sex with her boyfriend previously in the week and not from intercourse with her boyfriend that same night after intercourse with Winston. So your contention surprised me, sort of. The sole support for your contention she's a slut appears to be that she slept or had intercourse with two men on the same night. If it is correct that she didn't sleep with 2 men on the same night, while it may or may not mean she's not a slut, would seem to eliminate any support for the basis of your contention. Can you support - cite the DA document - where it's publicly available that states she slept or had sex with two men on the same night? The reason I said above ...surprised me, sort of .... is that like you initially I thought the state was saying she had intercourse with 2 men the same night. They really allowed that thought to hang out there, maybe even encouraged the perception and that really would have most of us thinking less than kind thoughts about this woman. But later I picked up on this statement that the non Winston DNA they found in her panties was from intercourse with a boyfriend earlier in the week. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Non-Cattle Specific Topics
Sports, Hunting, Fishing & Wildlife
No charges
Top