Menu
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Forums
Cattle Boards
NCBA, R-CALF, COOL, USDA (No Politics!)
New York Firm Recalls Beef Carcass That Contains (BSE)
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Help Support CattleToday:
Message
<blockquote data-quote="flounder" data-source="post: 751253" data-attributes="member: 3519"><p>what traceability ??? the USDA could not trace their backside, if they had both hands right square on both cheeks. this was proven with the herd cohorts of the Texas mad cow (second one, if you include the stumbling and staggering mad cow that went to be rendered without any test at all) and the Alabama mad cow. then they stopped testing in numbers large enough to find it, due to what they knew they would find.</p><p></p><p></p><p>the price tag for a test would be about $10 to $15 dollars last i heard. a small price in my opinion for the American consumer, and the Consumers abroad. and i am sure if they were used, the price would go down. now i know what the officials will tell you, that by testing, this is not a food safety test. bullshit, it's better knowing with what you got, than not knowing, and ignoring, what you know you have. they DO have a test, it's not validated, and it will not be validated anytime soon. this is why they bought up the rights to the late Harash Narang's urine test. they did not want it validated by anyone. CWRU got it, tweaked it a bit, and shelved it. USDA REFUSES TO LET ANYONE TEST, for they know what they will find, and that is the bottom line. ITs why the USDA stopped testing to find. ...</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>kind regards,</p><p>terry</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="flounder, post: 751253, member: 3519"] what traceability ??? the USDA could not trace their backside, if they had both hands right square on both cheeks. this was proven with the herd cohorts of the Texas mad cow (second one, if you include the stumbling and staggering mad cow that went to be rendered without any test at all) and the Alabama mad cow. then they stopped testing in numbers large enough to find it, due to what they knew they would find. the price tag for a test would be about $10 to $15 dollars last i heard. a small price in my opinion for the American consumer, and the Consumers abroad. and i am sure if they were used, the price would go down. now i know what the officials will tell you, that by testing, this is not a food safety test. bullshit, it's better knowing with what you got, than not knowing, and ignoring, what you know you have. they DO have a test, it's not validated, and it will not be validated anytime soon. this is why they bought up the rights to the late Harash Narang's urine test. they did not want it validated by anyone. CWRU got it, tweaked it a bit, and shelved it. USDA REFUSES TO LET ANYONE TEST, for they know what they will find, and that is the bottom line. ITs why the USDA stopped testing to find. ... kind regards, terry [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Cattle Boards
NCBA, R-CALF, COOL, USDA (No Politics!)
New York Firm Recalls Beef Carcass That Contains (BSE)
Top