More BSE/Border Issues.......

Texan

Well-known member
Joined
Jun 3, 2004
Messages
1,887
City & State/Province
East Texas
Guess I've taken the wait and see approach on this whole border opening deal for the last few weeks. I think we probably need a little bit more information before we proceed, but that doesn't mean that it can't happen by March 7, as planned. Some of you might call me naive, but I trust the Canadians to do the right thing on providing more information as we require. The Canuck record of reporting their positives, even those that surface at the most inopportune times, seems to bear that out. Course I'm sure that there will be some that want to R-gue.

Below are some excerpts from an interesting article in the latest Livestock Weekly. The entire article was too long to post and I never have any luck linking them through the password protection. This is the first I've heard about some of this. Not trying to start any more cross-border bickering or finger-pointing blame games, but I wondered if any of you could verify this about the feed mill. Any comments, please?


USDA Vet Traces BSE’s History,
Outlines Surveillance Program

By David Bowser

WICHITA, Kan. —
It was a year ago that Dr. Kevin Varner of the U.S. Department of Agriculture's Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service was looking for Holstein cattle in the state of Washington.

As the USDA-APHIS Area Veterinarian in Charge, Varner was incident commander for the Washington state investigation after bovine spongiform encephalopathy, or mad cow disease, was found in a Holstein cow in the Northwest. In June and July, he became involved in the enhanced BSE surveillance effort..........

BSE, he says, almost without exception is contracted in the first six months of life. That’s why it was important to find where that cow in Washington state spent her first six months. "Where she was born, where she spent that first six months, is important," Varner stresses. "That's where she got the disease."

To be infected, an animal has to eat parts of an infected animal. "You have to make feed out of an infected animal," Varner explains, "and you have to feed it to other animals." There's no known spread from mother cows to calves. "It's basically spread by feed," Varner says..........

The disease was first named in 1986. By 1988, the British already knew that it was a feed-borne disease, but they didn't know what was causing it. They didn't know the cause, but they knew how it was being spread. They banned the feeding of ruminant-derived protein.

"They took that step in 1988," Varner says. "One of the interesting things about that step is they had mountains of bone meal in England that they could no longer feed to their animals." The question was what were they going to do with that stuff? "They shipped it to any country that would take it," Varner continues. "They shipped it throughout Europe and to the Far East." This is one of the reasons, he contends, that BSE showed up in so many countries in Europe and elsewhere. "Other countries were accepting the bone meal," he says...........

In 1991, Canadian officials found one animal with BSE in Alberta. It had been imported from England. "It wasn't even a human health issue," Varner says. That animal was destroyed. The herd was destroyed. Trade continued.

In 2003, a second case was found in Alberta, Canada in an Angus cow. She was fed bone meal before the feed ban was in place in Canada. In December 2003, U.S. officials found the Canadian-born Holstein cow in Washington state. "We had good records on her," Varner says. They were able to track down her birthmates and verified that she was the only one with the disease.........

All of cases found so far are from Alberta, Canada. Varner says at least the first three were all exposed to feed from the same feed mill. "There's some evidence that the Angus herd feed truck pulled away from the feed mill and the Holstein feed truck backed in right after it," Varner says. "There are some ties."

Canadian officials have backed away from publishing that, he says, but their investigation shows that they had been using the same feed mill........
 
Two things in this article stick out, for a starter I don't think they ever found all of the herdmates to the Wa. state cow that were imported at the same time. The other statement that truly bothers me is the age of transmision and feed being stated as if it is fact!!!!!!!!! As far as I know no one has ever been able to cause the transmision of bse thru any type of controlled study. They even tried direct injections into the brain with no luck. Everything that is being used now is THEORY and some are better than others. As far as the feed mill story, I think the Can. gov. would be overjoyed if this were true, it would have made there job a lot easier. If we had a set of FACTS on cause and transmision it would not be a prob. to control or eliminate bse and to reopen our export markets.
your friend
Mike
 
mwj":2u6vzsti said:
.......I don't think they ever found all of the herdmates to the Wa. state cow that were imported at the same time.
That's true, Mike. USDA never could complete the trace-forward on the rest of the herd that crossed with her, so they just gave up. But that's not what the article said. I assume you're referring to this part:

They were able to track down her birthmates and verified that she was the only one with the disease.........

Notice that the reference is to birthmates. Not herdmates. If they were able to trace the birthmates, and I have no reason to doubt that, then it must be because the Canadian tracking system was successful. At the very least, it seems to be a lot more effective than our own.
 
Texan
You may be corect,I thought the term birthmates ment cattle born at the same time within the herd as oposed to siblings which I would take as cattle born to the same cow. The feed statement and the age that they are infected is what really bothers me!!! Both statements are absolutely unproven.
your friend
Mike
 
mwj":2dvf4ypa said:
....I thought the term birthmates ment cattle born at the same time within the herd as oposed to siblings which I would take as cattle born to the same cow.
That's what I take it to mean, as well. But just because a dairy herd has been milked together as a herd, and is sold as a herd, does not mean that all of them were born and raised in that same herd. In other words, all of the cows in the herd were not necessarily of the same age and raising. In fact, I would think it would be very unusual if they were.

mwj":2dvf4ypa said:
The feed statement and the age that they are infected is what really bothers me!!! Both statements are absolutely unproven.
I can't argue with that. And we may never have definitive proof.......
 
Some of these old articles are interesting to go back and read. We didn't make the border opening of march 7
 

Latest posts

Back
Top