wildcat2154":3lvc9a9o said:Connealy Thunder born 1/28/2005 11y 5m old 34 pathfinder daughters out 817 eligible daughters = 4.2%
Hoover Dam born 1/25/2008 8y 5m 295 eligible dau 31 pf daus = 10.5%
Thank you and you are partly correct.... BUTjscunn":2d1sbzb7 said:SOB,
I like your thought process but one thing you need to consider is the older a sire is the harder it is gonna be to keep a high percentage.. Think back to EXT And 036 both at one time had over 100 pathfinder daughters but a low percentage because there were daughters that were 10 yrs old and up. A LOT easier for a 5 yr old to make pathfinder than a 10 yr old...
Son of Butch" I just looked up the current 2016 report for a personal favorite of mine Connealy Reflection at Accelerated Genetics 10.7% Connealy Reflection 35 out of 326 eligible daughters .... not saying he's the best said:Ironically, I'm thinking of using some reflection. Do you just like his daughters or can he make bulls? He certainly has a maternal pedigree but he's one whaaaale of a bull.
Can he make bulls?angus9259":2jpteh7z said:I'm thinking of using some reflection. Do you just like his daughters or can he make bulls?
He certainly has a maternal pedigree ....
Mytty in Focus top 10% ce 13 top 10% bw -1.7 and top 2% sc 2.06 really drove his popularityAir gator":2fjez9y5 said:As long as we are talking about older bulls...Mytty In Focus was the Pathfinder champ for 5 years, I believe.
I don't know how he can have a 2.9 HP epd and be the top bull for registrations for years.
Summit at Select Sires is a well proven sire with top 5% ce top 1% doc top 1% $W you gotta love all thatW.B.":1s6o4vng said:If pathfinders interest you, check out S Summit 956. If I remember right he was 6 out of 13.
Air gator":qgqles9a said:Other than calving ease why was Mytty In Focus so popular?
+2.06 scrotal circumference - Everyone knows the Nuts, Butts & Guts saying.
Add top 10% calving ease with top 2% sc and you've big time sales.
Plus ABS gets as much semen into cows as anyone, so top notch marketing and distribution is always a factor.
I read a post somewhere that if you looked in a pasture you would be able to pick out the MIF cows because they would be the "ugly" ones.
If his heifers were difficult to breed then why did people keep breeding to him?
Name recognition and demand for sons. There is always a big demand for bulls with big nuts and In Focus sons sure have them. HP accuracy takes a long time, much longer than calving ease acc. Since everyone "knows" big nuts = daughter fertility they are much more willing to give him a pass when hp accuracy is low. Plus look how many pathfinder daughters he was producing (without considering % of eligible daughters) Success stories are easy to find when you have so many to choose from. It all helps keeps the sales rolling right along, and people fear missing out on a good thing, so they will buy on the approval of others. IE I know so and so is selling sons of him and if he is good enough for him to use I should probably be using him too.
How can you produce so many Pathfinders if your fertility is so low? It doesn't make sense.
Throw enough spaghetti at a wall and some of it is going to stick.
There is a popular A.I bull now that has a -8 epd for HP but he is quite popular.
(There is another Angus bull that is -5 for CEM and he is a hot bull).
Not sure why anyone would add that to his or her herd.
Butch,
I am interest to see if Summit's brother S Whitlock will produce quality heifers as well.
S Whitlock seems to have better beef qualities.
Beef traits and maternal traits are antagonistic to each other, which is why I was surprised by War Party's high % of path finder daughters. Whitlock could produce quality heifers, but as a betting man I'd put my money on Summit over Whitlock. (You can collect your winnings in a few years as time will tell.)
Excellent point Lucky_PLucky_P":3w2idtfg said:OK, y'all are all jacked up about numbers of Pathfinder daughters... that's all about registered cows, in herds where folks collect and turn in 'numbers' to the breed association - and perhaps (not always) 'pamper' those cows somewhat. That's all well and good... but what about sires being used in commercial herds - unregistered straightbred or crossbred - that may be subjected to more stringent production/performance criteria?
Inquiring minds want to know....