Menu
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Forums
Non-Cattle Specific Topics
Coffee Shop
Hobby Lobby in the news.....
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Help Support CattleToday:
Message
<blockquote data-quote="CottageFarm" data-source="post: 1148307" data-attributes="member: 16552"><p>Any private company should have the right to not offer health insurance benefits, or any other benefit of their choosing. </p><p>Any private citizen should have the right to decide for whom they will work. If a company doesn't offer the benefits they want, they can choose to work for a company that does. </p><p></p><p>I would also like to clarify the ruling made by the SCOTUS yesterday. It was a very narrow ruling that said that certain types of companies (those closely held and operated by a few individuals) could not be compelled to provide certain types of medications/devices, or the funding of the same, because it would be a violation of their 1st amendment rights. The courts specifically ruled that this decision in no way was contradictory to the execution of ACA rules as the work around has already been established for faith based organizations. </p><p>The suit brought by HL was very specific in its objection to post fertilization termination drugs and a couple of IUD's that can also terminate post fertilization. The company currently provides coverage for contraception prevention drugs and did so prior to the passage of ACA. </p><p></p><p>We do not give up our constitutional freedoms as individuals simply because we start a business. That was the gist of the Citizens United ruling, and personally I applaud that ruling.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="CottageFarm, post: 1148307, member: 16552"] Any private company should have the right to not offer health insurance benefits, or any other benefit of their choosing. Any private citizen should have the right to decide for whom they will work. If a company doesn't offer the benefits they want, they can choose to work for a company that does. I would also like to clarify the ruling made by the SCOTUS yesterday. It was a very narrow ruling that said that certain types of companies (those closely held and operated by a few individuals) could not be compelled to provide certain types of medications/devices, or the funding of the same, because it would be a violation of their 1st amendment rights. The courts specifically ruled that this decision in no way was contradictory to the execution of ACA rules as the work around has already been established for faith based organizations. The suit brought by HL was very specific in its objection to post fertilization termination drugs and a couple of IUD's that can also terminate post fertilization. The company currently provides coverage for contraception prevention drugs and did so prior to the passage of ACA. We do not give up our constitutional freedoms as individuals simply because we start a business. That was the gist of the Citizens United ruling, and personally I applaud that ruling. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Non-Cattle Specific Topics
Coffee Shop
Hobby Lobby in the news.....
Top