Menu
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Forums
Non-Cattle Specific Topics
Coffee Shop
Help me, please.
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Help Support CattleToday:
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Theodore W." data-source="post: 267731" data-attributes="member: 4644"><p>OK, the factual question I have is: Does anybody know whether the <em>Annual report of the Department of Agriculture 1864 </em>is really the publication with the article by Winthrop W. Chenery about Dutch cattle with Holstein in the title? </p><p></p><p>Where did the other thousand imports come from? From the Netherlands 7,757 animals were exported, in the United States about 8,800 were imported. </p><p></p><p>What is the best way to describe the Friesian/Holstein-pattern in a way setting it apart from all other colouration you find in cattle?</p><p></p><p>Can anybody summarize developments in the Notrth-American Holstein breeding in the period 1940-1970?</p><p></p><p>Except for that I just need somebody willing to tell me where in a text in progress I am hard to understand. It's all just a bit complicated. </p><p>More than a century of cattle registry, </p><p>its interactions with a horse registry it shared lots with,</p><p>a home land to the breed named in a way that suggests a "Who's on first"-like act,</p><p>loads of Americans who think that Holsteins come from Holstein.</p><p>loads of people who seem to genuinely believe that the origin for the Dutch/Holstein/Friesian appearance has to be sought in Roman/pre-historic times, while that look was not found on Friesian cows before 1700. </p><p></p><p>It's depressing... Nobody seems to care about a bull like Vondeling (born 1914) anymore..., It's depressing to think that breed associations do not know the origin of their own breed anymore...</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Theodore W., post: 267731, member: 4644"] OK, the factual question I have is: Does anybody know whether the [i]Annual report of the Department of Agriculture 1864 [/i]is really the publication with the article by Winthrop W. Chenery about Dutch cattle with Holstein in the title? Where did the other thousand imports come from? From the Netherlands 7,757 animals were exported, in the United States about 8,800 were imported. What is the best way to describe the Friesian/Holstein-pattern in a way setting it apart from all other colouration you find in cattle? Can anybody summarize developments in the Notrth-American Holstein breeding in the period 1940-1970? Except for that I just need somebody willing to tell me where in a text in progress I am hard to understand. It's all just a bit complicated. More than a century of cattle registry, its interactions with a horse registry it shared lots with, a home land to the breed named in a way that suggests a "Who's on first"-like act, loads of Americans who think that Holsteins come from Holstein. loads of people who seem to genuinely believe that the origin for the Dutch/Holstein/Friesian appearance has to be sought in Roman/pre-historic times, while that look was not found on Friesian cows before 1700. It's depressing... Nobody seems to care about a bull like Vondeling (born 1914) anymore..., It's depressing to think that breed associations do not know the origin of their own breed anymore... [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Non-Cattle Specific Topics
Coffee Shop
Help me, please.
Top